Scan barcode
emilietje's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.25
When I was reading the first two chapters, I was missing reflections and/or explanations. I suppose it makes sense that Yeong-hye’s chapter is the most gorey, because her emotions are the most repressed and she has the worst nightmares. I mean, her chapter isn’t even from her point of view, it’s her husband’s. And I suppose it makes sense that the brother-in-law's chapter contains the most discomforting sexual descriptions and misconduct, because, well, that’s his issue. I ended up enjoying In-hye's chapter the most. It was the most introspective and least gruesome one after all. I liked reading her interpretations and her feelings about life and death. I'd say her chapter felt the most cohesive for this exact reason. The gaps between moments of insanity and despair are filled in with her thoughts, and I think the reading experience would’ve been nicer if it had those from the start.
One other thing that I liked –and this might be a spoiler but whatever– is Yeong-hye's whole wanting-to-become-a-tree thing. It's not something I've read before you know? Being deeply unhappy as a human and as an animal, so you try to become a tree in every way until you die from the effects. Idk, this also really shined in that last and third chapter and I really felt for her. Successful and effective portrayal of passive suicide and insanity? Yes!
Regardless of everything I said here, this book was clearly not aimed at a reader like me who can’t handle shit. I totally get that there aren’t meant to be fleshed-out (get it ha ha) thoughts in the beginning, but it just wasn’t my style. I went into this book blind, because I loved Han Kang's The White Book and Human Acts, but I have to say this was almost nothing like those books. The only overlap I can find is the miserable people and the introspection about what it is to be alive. Props to Han Kang for publishing works with what feels like a completely different writing style.
Graphic: Death, Domestic abuse, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Gore, Infidelity, Mental illness, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexual violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Suicide attempt, and Schizophrenia/Psychosis
abbysnofun's review against another edition
4.0
Graphic: Gore, Rape, Sexual violence, and Vomit
Moderate: Mental illness
mimithorp's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Eating disorder, Mental illness, Misogyny, Rape, Self harm, Sexism, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Blood, Medical content, Medical trauma, and Suicide attempt
nico_lechat's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Eating disorder, Sexism, Sexual assault, and Forced institutionalization
Moderate: Sexual content and Sexual violence
Minor: Suicide attempt
thebigemmt505's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
The Vegetarian is a book I’ve struggled to gather my thoughts on. It’s the story of a young woman named Yeong-hye, whose life is told from every perspective but her own. While she says her transition to vegetarianism (well, veganism really) followed a dream she had, the audience can deduce it is so much more than that. Yeong-hyes life is rife with abuse, abuse she clearly refuses to inflict herself. She’s weak, struggling under patriarchy and strict social norms, and her only defiance seems to be shrinking herself, shedding all that makes her human and returning to a pure, natural state. We learn through the men that use and abuse her, being her husband, her sisters husband, and briefly her father, that no matter what perception others have of her, the result of her vulnerability will be the same: abuse. Through her sister, In-hye, we see a more direct reckoning with the past they shared, and by the end both she and the audience may wonder what absurdity keeps them going. It’s bittersweet.
My small interpretation is all I can glean from this book. There’s likely a lot that I missed, though I may argue the metaphors were a bit too vague to fully grasp. Granted, I get the impression a lot was lost in translation, because there were many parts that felt clunky and strangely written. Still, there were beautiful passages, especially in the last part, though I thought the sentiments were repetitive after a point. I found the end disappointing and abrupt. I appreciated the authors capacity to write despicable characters, though it felt hard to attach oneself to any character at all. I found some of the choices the characters made confusing. At the very least, the pacing was good, the writing was generally good too, and I don’t feel I wasted my time. I just didn’t connect to it much.
In summary, it’s an odd little book. Worth a read, though it will likely be a let down to many. I still mostly enjoyed it though.
Graphic: Eating disorder, Misogyny, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, and Forced institutionalization
Moderate: Self harm and Suicide attempt
Minor: Animal cruelty
crybabybea's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? N/A
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
4.0
This is clearly a novel that was written with the intention to make readers think and reflect, I think it is a testament to Han Kang's skill as a writer that everyone comes away from this experience with different thoughts and analyses.
The writing is super allegorical and it's clear that each event happens for a reason and is designed to make the reader reflect and analyze. I found the writing style to be the main issue that kept me from giving it 5 stars; it jumped around in POV and tense, which, although it was written very well, became hard to follow at times.
I definitely feel like there were bits that went over my head and this is a book that deserves a reread with more concentration and reflection.
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Child abuse, Confinement, Eating disorder, Gore, Infidelity, Mental illness, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Medical content, Medical trauma, Suicide attempt, and Schizophrenia/Psychosis
Minor: Incest
Very graphic depictions of animal torture and death. Not quite incest but thekiri's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Child abuse, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Rape, Self harm, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Vomit, Medical content, Medical trauma, Suicide attempt, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Pregnancy
annie_arya's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Body horror, Bullying, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Infidelity, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Self harm, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Blood, Vomit, Medical trauma, and Suicide attempt
angorarabbit's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Bullying, Child abuse, Domestic abuse, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Gore, Mental illness, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Rape, Self harm, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Medical content, Medical trauma, Suicide attempt, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Incest and Alcohol
I skipped 5 paragraphs 25% of the way in due to graphic animal abuse/killing. The protagonists thoughts include disturbing depictions of slaughter and molestation of animals. There are graphic depictions of food including meat.aliyahoff's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
3.5
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Domestic abuse, Eating disorder, Mental illness, Rape, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Forced institutionalization, Suicide attempt, and Schizophrenia/Psychosis