Reviews

Who Needs Donuts? by Mark Alan Stamaty

inkdrinker83's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

What a wild book. The illustrations are so odd and overly detailed, filled with humor and strange creatures. If you like Edward Gorey and R. Crumb, you would love this book.

dawnoftheread's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This may be one of the weirdest picture books I've ever read.

bluenicorn's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I love this book. The illustrations have all the detail of a Hieronymus Bosch painting- but in a non-creepy way. And the story is great. Especially if you like donuts or love.

lucyblack's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This book is rad. I like it that the author is not afraid to give the main kid character some real issues and problems to deal with. I guess it comes down to greed and love and that horrible feeling when you are a kid that you just want stuff so bad and no other emotion can compete. It made me hungry for: more from this author, more big city life and ,obviously, donuts.

bev_reads_mysteries's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Who Needs Donuts? is an absolutely delightful children's book by Mark Alan Stamaty (both story & pictures). I have no idea how I missed this one growing up. And only discovered it now thanks to my good friend Richard. In a conversation that started with the closing of H&H Bagels in NYC, we wound our way 'round to Who Needs Donuts. Richard was amazed that I'd not heard of this book. I managed to lay my hands on it (thanks to a deal with Amazon), have it delivered today and whizzed through it in half an hour. But that's just a preliminary run-through. I suspect I'll be going back to look at this one--sneaking peeks off and on like I used to do with my son's Where's Waldo? books.

In fact, Donuts has a very Waldo feel to it. The pages are jam-packed with illustrations that have what seems to be millions of things going on in them. The story is a simple one: Sam is a little boy who loves donuts. He takes off on his tricycle to the big city where he suspects there must be all the donuts he could ever want. He makes friends with a man who collects donuts and it would seem that Sam's dreams have come true. But then he learns a valuable lesson. Who needs donuts when you've got love?

First published in 1973, Donuts never received the recognition that Waldo and other densely illustrated books have enjoyed. It's a shame because the drawings are outstanding--you could look at them for hours and still not see everything there is to see. The downright kookiness embodied in the illustrations are sure to appeal to kids....and those of us with a kid still hiding inside. Four and a half stars.

nsfinch's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

This was really weird and I didn't love it. I didn't like the particular style of art. But there's so much to find in the illustrations upon multiple rereadings that I still think it would be a good book for a kid. I think this is a good book that just isn't for me.

duckofdoom42's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

The story is simple, but the artwork is exceptional. Full of weirdness, wordplay, and wonder. Jesse Thorn talked it up on his NPR show Bullseye, and if anything, he undersold how good it is.

tmaturino's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

loved the illustrations and looking at all the detailed artwork. story was ok but kids enjoyed finding donuts and looking at strange creatures artist created.

drtlovesbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Know going in that this is a really weird book. The plot is odd, and the drawings are odd - but incredibly, exquisitely detailed. I spent way more time perusing the absolutely hilarious and insane details of the backgrounds than I did dealing with the plot, which almost seems incidental to the artwork that was obviously lovingly crafted. This is a picture book whose value is in the images, and those images are so dense and detailed that a reader could go back to this book a dozen times and spend hours puzzling out all the gags and weirdness and fun going on here.