Scan barcode
extraaardvark's review against another edition
challenging
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.75
larkken's review against another edition
challenging
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
eimearlong's review against another edition
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
embey's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
1mpossiblealice's review against another edition
2.0
I found many things quite annoying about this book. To start with, as another reviewer mentioned, the man in the opening chapter killing himself seems a massive overreaction, and because of that, the whole plot seems a bit silly. I don't see that happening without some other backstory about his state of mind, other issues, etc.
After that there is the set up of the exhibition/pageant - to be honest I had no idea what this was, or what was the point of it. I couldn't really get what the exhibition was in the background, there were just mentions of people selling stuff and displaying new things. What that has to do with horses and stuff, I have no idea. So I was already confused. Then the murder happens, and there is some investigation, but a chunk of the book is repeating the stuff with the horses and what may or may not have happened. It's gone over SO many times with different people confessing or being accused that it just gets ridiculous and irritating. Even with that I found it difficult to visualise entirely what was meant to have been going on on the stage, backstage, etc. Most of the characters weren't interesting and I only finished the book to see what the solution was, and because the end of the book had so many versions of what happened, it didn't feel satisfying at all.
I did like Cockrill, and the younger, more urban police inspector underestimating him was fun. I probably won't read any more Brand - but others have said the previous three in this series are better, so I might consider it at some point.
After that there is the set up of the exhibition/pageant - to be honest I had no idea what this was, or what was the point of it. I couldn't really get what the exhibition was in the background, there were just mentions of people selling stuff and displaying new things. What that has to do with horses and stuff, I have no idea. So I was already confused. Then the murder happens, and there is some investigation, but a chunk of the book is repeating the stuff with the horses and what may or may not have happened. It's gone over SO many times with different people confessing or being accused that it just gets ridiculous and irritating. Even with that I found it difficult to visualise entirely what was meant to have been going on on the stage, backstage, etc. Most of the characters weren't interesting and I only finished the book to see what the solution was, and because the end of the book had so many versions of what happened, it didn't feel satisfying at all.
I did like Cockrill, and the younger, more urban police inspector underestimating him was fun. I probably won't read any more Brand - but others have said the previous three in this series are better, so I might consider it at some point.
tronella's review against another edition
adventurous
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
fictionfan's review against another edition
3.0
Knights in shining armour...
A grand exhibition is taking place in post-war London and part of the show will be a pageant starring eleven mounted knights in armour and a damsel in a tower. Among the cast and crew are three people whose irresponsible actions a few years ago led a young man to commit suicide. Perpetua (Peppi) was engaged to Johnny Wise, but for fun her “friend” Isabel, known to her “friends” as Jezebel, decided to get Peppi drunk and throw her into the willing arms of womanising actor, Earl Anderson. On discovering this, Johnny drove his car into a wall. Now the three begin to receive threatening notes and it appears someone is out to avenge Johnny’s death. And then Jezebel is murdered...
This is only my second Christianna Brand and to be honest I didn’t think it came even close to the wonderful Green for Danger. The plot is relatively simple in the sense that we know the motive from the beginning. But it becomes a hideously complicated howdunit based on which of all these knights or other crew members might have been able to murder Isabel in full view of the audience, helped by the fact that they were effectively all unrecognisable in their armour. Solution after solution is presented, only to be knocked down again by some piece of evidence Cockrill or the local Inspector Charlesworth had forgotten or subsequently learn. Suspect after suspect confesses, only to have their confessions disproved by minute pieces of evidence.
Maybe it all hangs together in the end, but truthfully my eyes had glazed over long before it reached that point. My first problem was that, while the three had behaved a little badly, I felt that Johnny seriously over-reacted when, instead of punching Earl and dumping Peppi, he topped himself, and as such I didn’t feel any of them deserved to be murdered. Secondly, I didn’t like anyone so I didn’t care about the murders nor about whodunit. And lastly, I certainly didn’t care about how it was done, since each of the failed solutions seemed as likely, or that should probably be unlikely, to me as the final one.
On the upside, Brand writes well and amusingly. There’s lots of humour in the book, mostly around the unspoken rivalry between Cockrill and Charlesworth. Cockrill is attending a police conference in the area and becomes involved because he knew Peppi long ago, when she lived down in his patch in Kent. He’s used to being a big fish in the Kentish pool, but in the Great Metropolis he discovers most people have never heard of him or, if they have, it’s because of a case where he famously made a complete hash of it. Charlesworth is a younger man and Cockrill is determined to beat him to the solution. It was the entertainment value of this rather one-sided rivalry that kept me reading after the plot had ceased to interest me.
Overall, I enjoyed it well enough but it didn’t meet my perhaps too high expectations. It won’t stop me reading more of the Cockrill books, though – as well as these two novels, I’ve read several of Brand’s short stories in various anthologies and always enjoyed them, so I feel this one was a blip, probably because the intricate how of crime never interests me as much as the why.
NB This book was provided for review by the publisher, the British Library.
www.fictionfanblog.wordpress.com
A grand exhibition is taking place in post-war London and part of the show will be a pageant starring eleven mounted knights in armour and a damsel in a tower. Among the cast and crew are three people whose irresponsible actions a few years ago led a young man to commit suicide. Perpetua (Peppi) was engaged to Johnny Wise, but for fun her “friend” Isabel, known to her “friends” as Jezebel, decided to get Peppi drunk and throw her into the willing arms of womanising actor, Earl Anderson. On discovering this, Johnny drove his car into a wall. Now the three begin to receive threatening notes and it appears someone is out to avenge Johnny’s death. And then Jezebel is murdered...
This is only my second Christianna Brand and to be honest I didn’t think it came even close to the wonderful Green for Danger. The plot is relatively simple in the sense that we know the motive from the beginning. But it becomes a hideously complicated howdunit based on which of all these knights or other crew members might have been able to murder Isabel in full view of the audience, helped by the fact that they were effectively all unrecognisable in their armour. Solution after solution is presented, only to be knocked down again by some piece of evidence Cockrill or the local Inspector Charlesworth had forgotten or subsequently learn. Suspect after suspect confesses, only to have their confessions disproved by minute pieces of evidence.
Maybe it all hangs together in the end, but truthfully my eyes had glazed over long before it reached that point. My first problem was that, while the three had behaved a little badly, I felt that Johnny seriously over-reacted when, instead of punching Earl and dumping Peppi, he topped himself, and as such I didn’t feel any of them deserved to be murdered. Secondly, I didn’t like anyone so I didn’t care about the murders nor about whodunit. And lastly, I certainly didn’t care about how it was done, since each of the failed solutions seemed as likely, or that should probably be unlikely, to me as the final one.
On the upside, Brand writes well and amusingly. There’s lots of humour in the book, mostly around the unspoken rivalry between Cockrill and Charlesworth. Cockrill is attending a police conference in the area and becomes involved because he knew Peppi long ago, when she lived down in his patch in Kent. He’s used to being a big fish in the Kentish pool, but in the Great Metropolis he discovers most people have never heard of him or, if they have, it’s because of a case where he famously made a complete hash of it. Charlesworth is a younger man and Cockrill is determined to beat him to the solution. It was the entertainment value of this rather one-sided rivalry that kept me reading after the plot had ceased to interest me.
Overall, I enjoyed it well enough but it didn’t meet my perhaps too high expectations. It won’t stop me reading more of the Cockrill books, though – as well as these two novels, I’ve read several of Brand’s short stories in various anthologies and always enjoyed them, so I feel this one was a blip, probably because the intricate how of crime never interests me as much as the why.
NB This book was provided for review by the publisher, the British Library.
www.fictionfanblog.wordpress.com
robinwalter's review against another edition
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
This was my third Brand, and my last. The best thing about this story was way it made constant references to the awful ineptitude of Cockrill in "Green for Danger". The appalling travesty of the bungling "reveal" in that story left me mad as hell and utterly bewildered at all the rave reviews. "The Crooked Wreath" was even worse as detective story, with country Bumpkin Cockrill doing exactly no detecting at all.
The mystery in this story was well constructed, but it suffered the same fundamental flaw as the other two - Cockrill. A bungler in "Green for Danger" and a family friend and spectator in "The Crooked Wreath", he did nothing in this story for overcome the contempt in which I held him.
He actually says at the end, when the villain has finished explaining how it was done, "I knew it all along". I do that too at the end of murder mysteries on TV, but it doesn't make me a great detective. Ditto for "Cockie".
The mystery in this story was well constructed, but it suffered the same fundamental flaw as the other two - Cockrill. A bungler in "Green for Danger" and a family friend and spectator in "The Crooked Wreath", he did nothing in this story for overcome the contempt in which I held him.
He actually says at the end, when the villain has finished explaining how it was done, "I knew it all along". I do that too at the end of murder mysteries on TV, but it doesn't make me a great detective. Ditto for "Cockie".
leandrathetbrzero's review against another edition
funny
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
I think I would have enjoyed this book more if I had the print version to read. I’ve realized that GADF reads can be hit or miss when it comes to my connection with the voice narrator, and this one didn’t quite grip me. I also blame myself for multitasking a bit too much while listening. I loved the threatening letters, the impossible crime element, and the humor throughout. I fully intend to reread this title as a physical copy one day because I think it should probably have been a 4-star read.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Suicide
Minor: Infidelity
shanaqui's review against another edition
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Death of Jezebel is a classic crime story by an author I've not read before, apparently featuring two of her series detectives as a kind of crossover event (though mostly from the point of view of the Kent policeman, Cockrill, and not too complimentary about Charlesworth, from Scotland Yard). I wonder if I'd have got more out of it by having read previous books with only one character (or both series, even).
Still, I found this book broadly enjoyable; what stood out was the background of the characters, the fact that they came from British-occupied Malaya and escaped when things changed there, a period of history I don't know much about. This wasn't used a lot, but it was critical to the fog of conclusion about who the characters were exactly, and their backgrounds.
I didn't find the description of the setup of the locked room mystery very clear, so found it difficult to visualise (though I always find it difficult to visualise), but the use of the suits of armour was clever. The denouement definitely stood out for being very dramatic, too.
I'd be curious to read more of Christianna Brand's stuff, but not in a hurry.
Still, I found this book broadly enjoyable; what stood out was the background of the characters, the fact that they came from British-occupied Malaya and escaped when things changed there, a period of history I don't know much about. This wasn't used a lot, but it was critical to the fog of conclusion about who the characters were exactly, and their backgrounds.
I didn't find the description of the setup of the locked room mystery very clear, so found it difficult to visualise (though I always find it difficult to visualise), but the use of the suits of armour was clever. The denouement definitely stood out for being very dramatic, too.
I'd be curious to read more of Christianna Brand's stuff, but not in a hurry.