ivannaalba's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
funny
reflective
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? N/A
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
iamother's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
inspiring
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
roses_are_rosa's review against another edition
3.0
This was extremely whacky. I understand why it is still considered one of the most important and enduring anti-war books and there were parts of it I really liked, but overall it was just a bit too weird for me to really enjoy it.
yiannakin's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
4.0
smadams's review against another edition
3.0
I don't know how I feel about this book... but I recognize it for its own genius. Perhaps if I had read it when it came out I would have added another star, but I thought it was just okay. It didn't pull me in as much as I wanted it to. Maybe that wasn't its purpose... and maybe I wasn't its intended reader. We'll go with that. I wouldn't read it again, but I'm glad I read it.
And the Tralfamadorians were fun, at least!
And the Tralfamadorians were fun, at least!
brightwatcher's review against another edition
challenging
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
madgin's review against another edition
challenging
dark
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
newishpuritan's review against another edition
3.0
I enjoyed the time-jumping determinism, but not the winking parody of science-fiction tropes that Vonnegut uses to justify it. God forbid that anyone should actually take science-fiction seriously as a literary form (in that respect, the book reminded me of Godard’s Alphaville). But maybe that’s just one particular manifestation of a broader postmodern irony. Other aspects of the book are less excusable. For example, the two female characters are drawn with all the subtlety of a Playboy cartoon. They are respectively: a) fat; and b) a naked sexpot. And Vonnegut seems to think that both these traits are inherently hilarious. I was also disappointed that the promised description of the bombing of Dresden never materialised. I get that this is kind of the point: its horrors are beyond the powers of realism. But it still felt like a cop-out.
The scenes on the train and in the prison camp are very good.
The scenes on the train and in the prison camp are very good.
znnys's review against another edition
5.0
The first time I read this book was over ten years ago. I didn't understand it, then. Barely absorbed it and remembered virtually nothing but the title. But I'm glad I came back to it now, with a more mature understanding of postmodernism, WW2, and trauma. This was a book that absolutely sucked me in, a harrowing adventure into the dark irreverence of war through time travel and alien abduction. War, from Vonnegut's perspective, is both a comic futility, and a transgression so alien that it changes its victims into something beyond human. I certainly wasn't pro-war going into this reading, but it gave me an entirely new perspective on the subject. You can tell this is a deeply personal work, and learning Vonnegut spent two decades writing it makes a lot of sense - to both the brilliance of the book, as well as how difficult it must have been for him to process his experience.
That scene really moved me. I think it expresses the nature of war so incredibly well: the young and innocent and manipulated in to doing work that they do not fully comprehend as destructive. It is work that will inevitably destroy them, too.
Spoiler
There's a brief moment towards the end where Billy Pilgrim finds a book by Kilgore Trout about a man who travels back in time to meet Jesus. He meets Jesus when he's twelve, and training to be a carpenter. Him and his father are commissioned to build a crucifix by Romans and they're grateful to have been given the work.That scene really moved me. I think it expresses the nature of war so incredibly well: the young and innocent and manipulated in to doing work that they do not fully comprehend as destructive. It is work that will inevitably destroy them, too.