Reviews

Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clarke

janey's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Interesting ideas, especially in retrospect. However, I thought there was too much exposition and not enough discovery for the reader. Dated, but still interesting.

rhanmitchell's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.25

contemplative science fiction
which paints a picture of our extinction
that is equal parts horrifying and fulfilling. it is hard to determine whether clarke sees the future he imagined as a good or bad thing,
(are the overlords benevolent guardians or are they merely conducting a kind of genocidal science experiment?)
but I personally like that it's ambiguous and left to interpretation. the overlords make for fascinating masters of humanity,
as they themselves serve an entity they do not fully understand and can only hope to someday join... or rival
. though there is a certain sadness for both species; for humanity
who does not want to leave behind their bodies/individuality, but are unknowingly forced to
,and for the overlords
who above all desire to transcend the physical world but, despite their mastery over it, cannot
. a bit dated. the biblical
and paranormal
elements weren't too much. I actually kinda liked them, especially how he merges the concept of
the collective unconscious
with conventional science fiction. but what was that about
reverse apartheid
??? weird shit. anyways, what an ending! it's a sci-fi classic with a disturbing yet beautiful philosophy. highly recommend.

kaecho's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

 you are not immune to propaganda, arthur c. clarke

the entire time i read this i was like wow some of these observations are spot on and then all of the sudden this guy is like "what if i did racism with absolutely no self-awareness :D." i appreciated the fact that he kind of full sent on the weird psychic shit but are any of these characters people? no lol

yngve_s's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

jclymer's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

foulone's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

jknight87's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious slow-paced

3.0

niallmc's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

kenzan18's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced

4.0

lynneliu's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0