Reviews with content warning for Fatphobia - See You Yesterday

This was a really cute romantic comedy! Basically the movie Palm Springs, but set on a college campus. Side note, I really love how Rachel Lynn Solomon’s characters never go to Ivy Leagues. They go to normal colleges and we need more representation of that. There’s fun time travel hijinks and the romance is a true slow burn. I really loved the main characters as well - it was easy to care about their predicament.
The only thing I didn’t like about the book was that there was a very typical-to-romcoms fight in the second act where one person severely overreacts and yet the other person who barely did anything wrong apologizes. Not my favorite trope, but that’s really a small complaint in the grand scheme of the book.

Content Warnings

crufts's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging funny hopeful mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

Barrett Bloom is a disaster on two legs. After a horrible final year of high school, her first day of college ends with her accidentally setting a frat house on fire.

There's the big bronze W that stands for What Did You Just Do? and Who Are You Trying to Fool? and Why Did You Think College Would Be Any Different?

But the next morning, Barrett wakes up... and it's the first day of college again. She's trapped in a time loop.

Soon she discovers that fellow student Miles is also trapped in the loop. Unfortunately, he's a fussy, reserved, rigid nerd who lectures her about physics in an infuriatingly pompous tone. Can Barrett deal with Miles long enough to free them both from the loop?

The book's blurb is unusual, as it spoils three major events: (a) there's a time loop, (b) Miles is trapped as well, and (c) there's a romance.

Although I imagine this wasn't an easy choice for the author to make, I think this was a great idea because it clearly explains the genre of the book, i.e. it is a romance with a sci-fi angle.

This is also the first book I've read with an explicitly Jewish American protagonist. This was quite cool and I liked how the Jewish characters were portrayed, including not only the religous aspects of Judaism (e.g. Shabbat) but also the ethnic and cultural ones (e.g. the protagonist's Big Jewish Hair and fondness for New York bagels).

In general, Barrett was extremely likeable as a protagonist. Her snarky tendencies were softened by her endearing determination to help her mother and other people affected by the time loop. I also liked how she was genre-savvy and considered how time loops work in fiction.

The romance was absolutely adorable. The development of the main characters' relationship seemed very natural and believable.

However I did think it was a little too convenient that Miles turned out to be

a Nice Jewish ~~Doctor~~ Physicist, when only 5% of UWashington students are Jewish and the random chance of Barrett being stuck with another Jew would be low

. I think this could have been lampshaded with some comments like "Wow, fancy that, what are the odds?".

The plot and pacing are great. I was impressed at how the author created a sense of momentum and plot advancement despite the looping structure. This seems to have been achieved by having the characters work their way through phases of emotion mapping to the Hero's Journey, e.g.

New Allies and Enemies (meeting Lucie and Miles), Fun and Games (trying to fulfill all their dreams), the Abyss (getting revenge on Cole leaves Barrett feeling worse than ever), Transformation (changing goals to look for the time travel professor), etc

I also liked how various themes and symbols were woven into the story. Barrett's fight to escape the time loop mirrors her fight to move past the horrible events of her highschool years, which still appear to her in flashbacks.

One improvement I would suggest to the story is to make the time loop mechanic more believable:

The idea that going down into a basement increased the gravitational pull on the protagonists in any significant way is not believable. They probably would have experienced bigger gravity differences simply by travelling around in the way they did (going to different cities, places that would have been closer to sea level, etc).
This gravity-based gimmick is also unconnected to the way the protagonists got stuck in the first place (which seems to have nothing to do with altitude).
I agree with the choice to make the method unrelated to emotion/character development/etc, as otherwise the rest of the plot wouldn't make sense. It just needed to be something that would be impossible to do by accident, e.g. performing some high-powered physics procedure in the university labs, instead of just descending to a certain altitude.

Overall, I had a blast reading the book and enjoyed the whole thing. I would definitely recommend it.

Content Warnings

civetta's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful inspiring mysterious fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

clichemarker's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny reflective slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Very very cute, but I feel like it could've been shorter and still had the same impact. Like there's a story that is told roughly 5 times with very little differentiation.
But! I could not stop reading this, so maybe the author did some things right

Content Warnings

cluckieduck's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny mysterious slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

I WANT THIS MADE INTO A TV SERIES RIGHT NOW!!

What an absolutely delightful read! This book was not even on my radar, but when I had to fill a reading challenge slot with "time looping," this one came highly recommended, and with good reason.

College-aged characters are becoming more grating to my cranky, ageing sensibilities 🤣, but both Barrett & Miles were endearing in their ways, separately and together as their relationship grew, and they were oh-so relatable. Their insecurities and idiosyncrasies were realistic and I was rooting for both of them as they stumbled around trying to redefine their identities against their high-school selves all while trying to break free from the time-loop situation.

Cute, fun, and lovely. What more can I say!

Content Warnings

thetinysnail's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful inspiring lighthearted mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

Content Warnings

jetromeo's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny inspiring lighthearted slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

stuckinatimeloop's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

at first barret was kinda annoying. but i'm a sucker for time loop romances apparently. miles was so cute and they were so cute together even if it took a while. it's kinda a slowburn but it's not too long.

Content Warnings

More...