Reviews tagging 'Sexual content'

See You Yesterday by Rachel Lynn Solomon

49 reviews

srk001's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful lighthearted relaxing sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rainy_8's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

dramagirl2003's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional lighthearted mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

i liked it, took me a while to get through but that’s probably only cause this was ebook and i prefer reading physical copies
the loop system was unique to any other i’ve read or seen, so that was fun :)

thoughts while reading

4%: i bet laptop dude is the one stuck in a loop and that’s why he’s kinda grumpy
30%: why don’t they try getting miles’ mum involved
40%: well clearly ms devereux
is a time-traveler herself
45%: i suspect the way to break the loop is something to do with
max
62%: or maybe
barrett has to tell her mom what happened to her
63%: did miles plan this?
66%: NOT what i was expecting.
here was me going “oh! they just triggered a memory of something from before they started looping” but no.
ok then
70%: no but what if they are though? maybe
barrett and miles burned in the frat on the night they first kissed
72%: there was very little chance of cole walker ever apologising to your face
74%:
but it did say studying!! something changed!
88%: now we’re cooking!!
92%: please no. please let him be joking
97%: THANK GOD

"I never thought I could be this turned on in a library," he says.
"Clearly, you're not reading the right books."
jfjfkksjsk that’s all i’m saying girl 😏

98%: gladys is a slay

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

orangeowl55's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional lighthearted mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nutmegandselkie's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny inspiring slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jemau11's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

This was a really cute romantic comedy! Basically the movie Palm Springs, but set on a college campus. Side note, I really love how Rachel Lynn Solomon’s characters never go to Ivy Leagues. They go to normal colleges and we need more representation of that. There’s fun time travel hijinks and the romance is a true slow burn. I really loved the main characters as well - it was easy to care about their predicament. 
The only thing I didn’t like about the book was that there was a very typical-to-romcoms fight in the second act where one person severely overreacts and yet the other person who barely did anything wrong apologizes. Not my favorite trope, but that’s really a small complaint in the grand scheme of the book.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ankiaisreading's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

crufts's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging funny hopeful mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

Barrett Bloom is a disaster on two legs. After a horrible final year of high school, her first day of college ends with her accidentally setting a frat house on fire. 
There's the big bronze W that stands for What Did You Just Do? and Who Are You Trying to Fool? and Why Did You Think College Would Be Any Different?
But the next morning, Barrett wakes up... and it's the first day of college again. She's trapped in a time loop.
Soon she discovers that fellow student Miles is also trapped in the loop. Unfortunately, he's a fussy, reserved, rigid nerd who lectures her about physics in an infuriatingly pompous tone. Can Barrett deal with Miles long enough to free them both from the loop?

The book's blurb is unusual, as it spoils three major events: (a) there's a time loop, (b) Miles is trapped as well, and (c) there's a romance.
Although I imagine this wasn't an easy choice for the author to make, I think this was a great idea because it clearly explains the genre of the book, i.e. it is a romance with a sci-fi angle.

This is also the first book I've read with an explicitly Jewish American protagonist. This was quite cool and I liked how the Jewish characters were portrayed, including not only the religous aspects of Judaism (e.g. Shabbat) but also the ethnic and cultural ones (e.g. the protagonist's Big Jewish Hair and fondness for New York bagels).
In general, Barrett was extremely likeable as a protagonist. Her snarky tendencies were softened by her endearing determination to help her mother and other people affected by the time loop. I also liked how she was genre-savvy and considered how time loops work in fiction.

The romance was absolutely adorable. The development of the main characters' relationship seemed very natural and believable.
However I did think it was a little too convenient that Miles turned out to be
a Nice Jewish Doctor Physicist, when only 5% of UWashington students are Jewish and the random chance of Barrett being stuck with another Jew would be low
. I think this could have been lampshaded with some comments like "Wow, fancy that, what are the odds?".

The plot and pacing are great. I was impressed at how the author created a sense of momentum and plot advancement despite the looping structure. This seems to have been achieved by having the characters work their way through phases of emotion mapping to the Hero's Journey, e.g.
New Allies and Enemies (meeting Lucie and Miles), Fun and Games (trying to fulfill all their dreams), the Abyss (getting revenge on Cole leaves Barrett feeling worse than ever), Transformation (changing goals to look for the time travel professor), etc
.

I also liked how various themes and symbols were woven into the story. Barrett's fight to escape the time loop mirrors her fight to move past the horrible events of her highschool years, which still appear to her in flashbacks.

One improvement I would suggest to the story is to make the time loop mechanic more believable:
The idea that going down into a basement increased the gravitational pull on the protagonists in any significant way is not believable. They probably would have experienced bigger gravity differences simply by travelling around in the way they did (going to different cities, places that would have been closer to sea level, etc). 
This gravity-based gimmick is also unconnected to the way the protagonists got stuck in the first place (which seems to have nothing to do with altitude).
I agree with the choice to make the method unrelated to emotion/character development/etc, as otherwise the rest of the plot wouldn't make sense. It just needed to be something that would be impossible to do by accident, e.g. performing some high-powered physics procedure in the university labs, instead of just descending to a certain altitude.

Overall, I had a blast reading the book and enjoyed the whole thing. I would definitely recommend it. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

joisaddler's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful lighthearted sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mmirjamm's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings