Reviews tagging 'Panic attacks/disorders'

Talking at Night by Claire Daverley

4 reviews

geoalice23's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

my love for the writing style grew at the same rate my hate for the plot did 

tw: trauma bond 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

yourpalwhit's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

Although this is the first lit fic i could actually finish is several months, there is something about it that really perturbs me. It's not just that rollercoaster ride of emotions i can only equate to a Disney princess film, but also, something about the introduction of the brother's sexuality, the focus on developing his reactions to it rather than actually developing him into an endearing character before writing him into what reads like a pretty clique ending--almost like he was developed to be the "token" in a contemporary novel just so people would buy it. Like when people say "I have a friend who's <insert Black, Latino, Trans person, gay> here. 

Another thing that perturbs me about this book is the ending. I had to fight the urge to skip ahead in some parts of the story...to will myself not to just skip to the last page, only to get to the last page and have the author give out. I don't always need a happy ending, but some kind of ending would have been nice.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rinnavv's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

I saw people comparing this book to Normal People (which I really enjoyed). I remember wishing for that book to be longer, and this one basically is that but way worse. This one spans over a long period of time in attempt to show personal growth but only demonstrates that the main characters are unable to develop their teenage brains. The synopsis says how the characters are “destined to be one another's great love story” but it’s misleading. Instead of love (or pain as the author kept angstily contrasting the two) the connection between the characters has formed from deep trauma, the “tragedy” hinted at from the same synopsis. The only way to get over something like this would be to fully move on… imagine if
Pippa
and Theo from the Goldfinch ended up together! I only really read the whole thing due to feeling bad about buying a hardcover… Also perhaps due to this same stupid desire to just get over with the plot, which I experienced when reading Cleopatra and Frankenstein. It's sad that it is difficult for me to tell early if the story is taking a similar to Coco Mellor's creation's course. The writing style is fine, I am surprised how easily I was able to get used to the absence of quotation marks (still, please stop this trend!). 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

reads_eats_explores's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

One cold November night, teenagers Will and Rosie meet while sitting around a bonfire, surrounded by their school friends, including Rosie’s twin brother and Will’s good friend, Josh. 

This is a story as old as time – the overprivileged, shy, straight-A girl who falls for the achingly handsome, wrong-sides-of-the-track bad boy. 

But maybe as we follow Will and Rosie on their ‘will they/won’t they’ journey, things will not be quite as they seem.

Talking at Night begins in a small Norfolk town in the 1990s and is split into three parts entitled ‘before’, ‘after’, and ‘long after’, and as the book unravels, we learn about the shared traumas that give reason behind these headings.

The book overall felt very YA in narrative style, and I suppose 20-year-old me would lap this up; 40-year-old me wanted a grittier read that I could really get my teeth into.

Saying that, I did enjoy the read and found it nostalgia inducing and highly immersive (a book to binge in one or two long lazy sittings) once I got over my initial irritation with Rosie, much preferring Wills's point of view and backstory. I'll certainly read more from this author in future; this is undoubtedly a solid debut. 3.5⭐

Many thanks to the author and publisher for this advance copy. As always, this is an honest review.


Expand filter menu Content Warnings