Scan barcode
shay_talksbooks's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? Yes
4.25
This was a wonderful melting pot of Regency London meets magical realism, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. We follow Zacharias, England's first black Sorcerer Royal, as he navigates his new role, the dwindling supply of English magic, and the views of the rest of the Royal Society for Unnatural Philosopher's. Along the way he meets Prunella, a witch with exceptional talent in a world where women are not deemed capable of such feats.
There was a lot of exploration of racism, sexism and classism, touching on slavery at times too. There were moments that the frequency of racist & sexist views/comments seemed a little heavy-handed, but it felt very plausible for the period the book was set. I honestly think the setting wouldn't have felt as 'believable' or 'authentic' if it wasn't included.
I enjoyed the story, loved meeting all of the side characters (perhaps even enjoyed them more than the main characters at times), loved Prunella & Mak Genggang, and I'm intrigued to see where the second book in the duology takes us.
The only negatives I had: I would've loved some more world-building (on the magical side) and lot of the plot/twists were a little predictable.
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, and Sexism
Minor: Slavery
cmbohn's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, and Sexism
Moderate: Classism
Minor: Slavery, Pregnancy, Colonisation, and War
adoto's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
The cover does not properly set you up for what this story is: a very British story that both pays homage to early 19th century England as well as completely redresses its imperialism and overconsumption. It has Austen's wordiness and her dry wit, and it's hilarious when it wants to be, dark and gory when it doesn't.
The romance is sweet, but
Graphic: Misogyny, Racial slurs, Racism, and Xenophobia
Moderate: Violence and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Suicide
ijustreallyliketrees's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Misogyny, Racism, and Sexism
Moderate: Slavery
Minor: Death and Racial slurs
maryannsophia's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
Overall, I found it a fascinating book, but one with large flaws that make it hard to recommend.
Moderate: Domestic abuse, Gore, Racial slurs, Racism, Slavery, Suicide, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, Blood, Medical content, Cannibalism, Death of parent, Pregnancy, Cultural appropriation, and Abandonment
aplanetarymind's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
3.5
Moderate: Racial slurs, Racism, and Sexism
Minor: Death and Violence
Period-typical racism and sexism/misogyny. There is recount of the death of the parental figure, and several assassination attempts are described.achingallover's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Death, Misogyny, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexism, Slavery, Grief, and Death of parent