Reviews

Fröken Julie : ett naturalistiskt sorgespel by August Strindberg

mariettula's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A naturalistic work by Strindberg, a play about a man and a woman, a servant and an aristocrat, the clash of sexes and the clash of classes- which one comes out on top?

Though Julie and Jean are fascinating to read about, with multiple different motivations and insecurities, faults and triumphs, the play does fall short in some instances (as viewed with the eyes of a 21st century woman). Admittedly, it describes the struggle of the time it was written, when Darwinism had first erupted, society’s classes were questioned, and women’s Suffrage had come forth. And while all those elements make it very interesting to read about, when viewed as a product of its time, nowadays it reads as greatly misogynistic.

I would still recommend reading it though, as - unfortunately- it’s as relevant as ever and extremely well-written.

maddiebeehner's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

annoying characters

sidharthvardhan's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Very modern in terms of how short lived a love affair between high-on-harmones youngsters was.

petedake's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

cxffee_addxct's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Wasn't my favorite, but was overall a good play to write a paper on.

just_in_books's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

clara7's review

Go to review page

tense fast-paced
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

meyrathedreamer's review against another edition

Go to review page

this was.. interesting

danidamico's review against another edition

Go to review page

Lectura para Teoría y Análisis de las Artes Dramáticas.

catastrophe's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0