Reviews

The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes by Arthur Conan Doyle

esmuldi's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

werrronikka's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Kocham Sherlocka ale niestety te opowiadania strasznie szybko wylatują mi z pamięci

language_loving_amateur's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

brtuck's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

andreaitziar's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Arthur Conan Doyle tiene una pluma increíble para crear misterios que parecen no tener una solución lógica pero sigo pensando que desaprovecha muchos de sus personajes. En este punto (aunque con algunas historias pendientes), creo que el lector reconoce la evolución del personaje de Holmes pero casi no sabe cómo es Watson (aún siendo el narrador) más allá de algunas pinceladas y mucho menos de otros personajes, sobre todo de grandes villanos anunciados a bombo y platillo como James Moriarty o Charles Augustus Milverton que se acaban quedando en nada. Aunque, por supuesto, lo que hay que reconocerle a Arthur Conan Doyle es que gracias a su gran trabajo consiguó elevar y dar a conocer la figura del detective moderno.

laurenjpegler's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This book wasn't what I expected. I thought it was going to be one long novel about Sherlock Holmes uncovering a mystery, but instead it was about ten short stories all piled into one, which I didn't like. I felt like it distanced me from the text and characters, making it sometimes bored to read. When a story started to get good, it took a turn. I felt like there wasn't enough build up to the uncover, making it seem somewhat pointless to read? I just wanted more, u know?
However!! I did enjoy some stories, only a handful though. I seemed to like the murder mystery ones more, but I felt they could have been better if they were longer and more detailed/built up. So, yeah, not too sure. I might read some other Sherlock Holmes books, I might not. I just expected more from it, so I'm a little disappointed to say the least.

belleoftheb00ks's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

jmm11's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

4.0

chalkletters's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

As I've been reading through the Sherlock Holmes stories, I've had a vague question in my mind of whether I'd recognise the place where I left off last time I read through them. That questions remains unanswered for now, because I'd definitely read The Return of Sherlock Holmes before: not only do I remember The Adventure of the Empty House, but I also recalled The Adventure of the Solitary Cyclist. (Side note that Arthur Conan Doyle got a bit lazy with the titles in this one, they're all 'The Adventure of ---'.) 

The Adventure of the Empty House is definitely the most memorable story, as this is the one in which Sherlock Holmes makes his titular return from the (apparent) dead. It must have made an even bigger impact at the time, when readers discovered it wasn't just filling in a blank in the timeline but was actually reuniting Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson. 

The rest of the stories aren't terribly remarkable. They're solid and enjoyable enough, but they aren't doing anything special, and in a few places they seem inconsistent. Dr Watson draws the reader's attention to how unusual it is, in The Adventure of the Priory School, for Sherlock Holmes to care about money, but this sudden change in personality is never explained. Perhaps the reader is supposed to assume that Sherlock Holmes is happy to demand money from a character who is both unpleasant and rich enough to barely notice, but it would have been nice if there'd been any indication that he was going to do something with the money besides bank it. 

The Return of Sherlock Holmes does introduce Inspector Stanley Hopkins, who gets three adventures within this collection, which I think makes him the second-most prominent police character in the canon. It's quite fun to see him develop through the stories, from Sherlock Holmes having high hopes of him to being disappointed that he turns out just like any other police officer. 

As ever, it's fun to spot references which find their way into adaptations, but other than the titular return, this collection didn't offer much else that will be memorable.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

happysami's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5