Reviews

American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis

rachelizabel427's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

chloeprowse's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

novelfella's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Vile and disgusting….but I’d be lying if I said this wasn’t one of the best books I’ve ever read.
Patrick Batemen’s slow descent into madness is certainly one worth experiencing but god damn this book was probably the most disturbing thing I’ve ever experienced. Honestly the graphic murder and torture scenes made me want to both cry and vomit

evilegg's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

leviel's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Genuinely disturbing.

marykaleolsen's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Brillant. Ich hasse es.

gioiasuter's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

tiahnaparis's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I preferred the movie but it was very interesting to read the book and pick up on the adaptations differences. Like others have said it has VERY graphic passages (way worse than the movie) and it can get monotonous because the graphic passages are contrasted with pages and pages of meticulous outfit descriptions and musical reviews. I am a fast reader but read this book over a long time because the passages could be monotonous (intentionally). I think it’s very good at highlighting just how  reprehensible Bateman is and makes a good satire but it’s also not the most fun reading about someone who is so reprehensible, especially as a woman. The movie cannot or does not show as much horrible graphic stuff and doesn’t live entirely in Bateman’s head: there is narration but you do get breaks from it. It’s also directed by a woman and I find makes a better satire by fleshing out the world outside of Bateman and leaning more into the dark comedy aspects.

miiisch's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

5/5

I've been over this in my head again and again while reading this book, not really sure what rating to give it. I was originally not going to give the book any rating at all, but then decided against it. I might change my mind again later.

To start off, I want to tell every person thinking about reading this book: it's rough. It's brutal and graphic and violent and revolting. There are certain scenes I had to put the book down, take a break and then continue reading because I was so disgusted by the things happening in the story. There is a trigger warning in order for... everything? Racism, sexism, rape, violence, murder, cannibalism, etc. It starts off a little weird and ends up being a gruesome ride inside of a psychopathic serial killer's head. So I would advise to think twice about reading this novel if you're prone to get queasy and are sensitive about these topics.

Now my review: It took me a while to get through this book. Even though I found it very humourous and enjoyable in the beginning it was a bit exhausting with the constant name dropping and flexing of the main character. The chapters didn't flow like I'm used to by other novels and they seemed incohesive at certain times. But the further I got, the more I thought I got a grasp of Patrick Bateman. Of course, whenever a new chapter started, that feeling changed and I was taught better, as I couldn't get a grasp for Bateman's character for the whole book. Even though there is no clear thread or chronological story this novel presents itself as a fascinating character study of Patrick Bateman. The upper-class lifestyle of a Wallstreet businessman is juxtaposed with violent sexual fantasies and gruesome murders.

Bret Easton Ellis managed to create an interesting but revolting book about society and its fixation on the superficial but still managed to create light and even funny moments. I caught myself laughing out loud a few times. This book is rightly as controversially debated as it is but, in the end, the novel provoked and triggered more emotions than any book I've read until now has ever done. Ellis dared to spark disgust (and a lot of it) which not many authors dare to do and which I found very audacious and oddly refreshing at certain points. Because of the many emotions, I felt while reading this, I feel I need to give this book 5 stars. Also I'm always very intrigued by unreliable narrators such as in this book, where Bateman himself is telling his story.

I'm not sure if I would recommend this book to anyone since I really cannot judge even with close friends if they are ready for some of the fucked up scenes described in this book (usser du Emi, ich ha s Gfühl du chasch handle? aso ich hoffs?). I would advise anyone reading this to take it with a grain of salt and to stop whenever you feel that it is too much.

lara_readss's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0