Scan barcode
elliemaryn's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Moderate: Child abuse and Emotional abuse
jpreads_13's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Minor: Child abuse and Abandonment
agirlsnightbookbash's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Moderate: Child abuse
carbs666's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
I know the tone and pacing of this book (and the rest of the series) won't appeal to everyone, but I find it so funny and engaging. I also felt like the epilogue that capped off the whole series was surprisingly lovely. This whole series was fun and unique, I strongly recommend if you're willing to read something bonkers!
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Death of parent and Child abuse
Minor: Violence
lizziaha's review against another edition
4.0
Graphic: Ableism
Moderate: Child abuse
Minor: Trafficking
katjacatbeans's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
All the FMCs have been a bit peculiar and particular, but Alice is the one who most thoroughly had me saying "tell me you're autistic without telling me you're autistic". But it's never called out in text that way, and while in don't think it's a wholly unproblematic portrayal, it seems pretty good and doesn't feel stereotyped.
Minor: Child abuse
onthesamepage's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Steam level: 🌶
Alex clicked his tongue. “No doubt they’re searching for the weapon in efficient fashion—unlike you, who showed more interest in hanky-panky.”
Upon hearing this phrase, Alice’s inner dictionary opened its pages excitedly. “What does hanky-panky mean?” she whispered to Daniel.
“Witchcraft,” he whispered back.
I couldn't help but feel that there was something missing while I was reading this. I've enjoyed the previous two installments in this series. The writing is either going to work for you, or you're going to absolutely hate it. It's quirky and frequently breaks the fourth wall, not necessarily by directing commentary at the reader, but by reminding the reader that there is an author behind the words. I felt that a lot here, especially, and it distracted me from the book itself.
Seeing this, her heart clutched the book to its, er, heart with happiness.
And then theycontinued on with their search for the weapon like exemplary professionalskissed.
Sometimes this is funny, sometimes it isn't, but if you just read these quotes and winced, this series is probably not for you.
The book didn't fully grab me anyway, writing aside. The two main characters aren't pointed out to be neurodivergent, but they do read like it. Both have been trained to not show any emotion. They're professionals whose idea of fun is reading a good book (which I can absolutely get behind). When they're thrust into the hectic life of pirates while working undercover, it makes sense for them to struggle with what that entails. But I think there was too much time spent on pirate shenanigans, and too little time spent on helping me form a connection with the characters, or on developing the romance. We do learn fairly quickly that Alice and Daniel have had a crush on each other for over a year, but I didn't feel like they spent a lot of time communicating. I was told that they have an emotional connection, but rarely allowed to actually see it. The moments I did get to glimpse them were my favourite parts of the story. It happened more towards the end, but it made the middle part a bit of a slog.
There were POV scenes from both characters, but not evenly split. I think it was about 80-20 in Alice's favour, which was a shame because I liked what I did get to see of Daniel. I also really appreciated the cameos by the main characters from the previous two books.
All in all, I would recommend this series, and I had a good time with it.
Minor: Child abuse, Animal death, and Physical abuse
emalderwood's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Alice's sensory experiences and overwhelm I felt were well handled and realistic, including how she herself felt about them. Her autistic traits were kept mostly consistent through the book and went deeper than stereotypes - her autism was a part of what made her, her but she encompassed more beyond the symptom checklist and had her own unique coping mechanisms that allowed her individuality to shine. She also experienced difficulty, and shame, and pain from how her autism impacts her. I really appreciated how that was handled. Alice's hurt and reflections on who she is vs who her many masks are made me feel seen.
I did feel that Alice's lack of awareness around idiom and subtleties of conversation weren't entirely consistent with her character, though. I appreciated her not picking up on all of them or interpreting them incorrectly or just not noticing when someone was speaking with double meaning. What I wasn't as much a fan of was how that was the case in every situation. I felt that as an intelligent spy, who supposedly has spent so long masking and pretending to be someone else undercover, that she would at least have studied and learned the real meaning of some of the idioms and euphemisms people were using. Even if she still forgot or had to take a minute to figure it out, or got it wrong sometimes, it wouldn't have felt it so at odds with how she's had to adapt over her life and mask.
Overall a great read and I absolutely adored Alice. I could tell the author took her time trying to do her justice.
Moderate: Sexual content and Violence
Minor: Panic attacks/disorders, Ableism, Bullying, and Child abuse
tobyw's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.0
I found the writing style cute at first but it quickly became grating. There were a couple really funny lines, but it mostly floundered in a repetitive word salad. It did that annoying thing of refusing to commit to omniscient or limited, so we kinda just... floated, with the occasional jarring reference to 21st century pop culture.
Two problems engendered by the weak POV choice were "telling over showing" and failure to raise the stakes. We're constantly being told how dangerous etc. a character is, and frequently by one-upping the other characters (ie. So-and-so's raised eyebrow is more dangerous that a whole horde of pirates). But none of it hits because it's all icing and no cake. You haven't even convinced me the pirates are dangerous yet. This doesn't work. The most convinced I was of the pirates' dangerousness was early in the book, when Alice and Daniel are almost shot down on their way to Starkthorn. After that, it was a slow roll downwards. No one even gets hurt in this book, let alone killed. It's just farcical to witter on about how deadly everyone is when there's literally nothing to back it up. The one character who DOES actually try to kill a bunch of people (not in a quirky "hehe murder attempt" way, in a way that is treated by the narrative as an actual threat) is NOT counted among the characters that gets a bunch of hay made about what a threat they are.
The middle of the book was meandering. I'm sure it would be more compelling if you were invested in the romance, but it's a pity that a fun plot set-up got sidelined so hard. The romance didn't really compel me; I wish there was more substance to it besides literature quotes and sexual attraction. I guess I don't read these kinds of light romances very often (I loved One Last Stop, which is the closest comparison I can think of from my reading history) but it was genuinely kind of weird how often the book would just spout a cliche completely unaltered, and I'd read on, expecting some kind of subversion, but... no, it was literally just... the cliche. Their first meeting is probably the most egregious example, but I may have gone numb to it a 100 pages in.
Are Cecilia/Ned and Alex/Charlotte the protagonists of the previous books? I had a bit of trouble differentiating between them. There's a point near the end where Alice sees either Charlotte or Cecilia's personal library flying house and gets all misty-eyed and yearning, and then Daniel gets her a similar house... I dunno. Just seemed like a lack of creativity and variation in characters.
I appreciate the attempt at autism and neurodiverse representation, which I clocked early on but didn't know about going in, although it fell short in a couple of places. I think the high point was establishing Alice's variable discomfort with being touched; it's appropriate for a romance and it felt mostly true to life. I saw a complaint from another reviewer (on goodreads, I think) that they felt that Daniel "cured" too much of Alice's autistic characteristics. I don't entirely agree because I related a lot to the exploration of "I hate being touched unless it's by you, sometimes, in a particular way". That being said, I was a little put-off by how their big sex scene heavily relies on descriptions of Daniel breaking all the rules Alice set up about touching her. Not hot, dude.
Also, Daniel? He was clearly also being set up as autistic, but I had more gripes with how *his* autism is put on hold whenever things are getting hot and heavy. I'm not surprised that Austen-lite emulations like to go heavy on the "male protagonist being extremely courteous and deferring to the woman's desires" thing, but it felt more like Daniel's personality was erased to default back to Male Romantic Lead whenever things were getting intimate. He was of course way more sexually experienced than her, and she was pure and innocent as a flower.
That's where the representation really did not work for me. Alice's autism ends up infantilizing her with how thickly the author lays on the "she doesn't understand figurative speech" thing. Daniel, meanwhile, has no obvious problem with it. He gets sexual innuendo easily; Alice is the one who constantly needs enlightening. We're told in his internal monologue that he doesn't have an imagination and thinks very concretely, but it's telling over showing, and not a convenient excuse to make the female lead completely sexually naive.
Furthermore, Alice going on about how she doesn't like social interaction stretched my suspension of disbelief. It's just... a really bizarre thing to harp on for someone whose profession is SPYING? The author almost stuck the landing with Alice occasionally trying to match micro-expressions to the ones she learned out of a book -- that would've actually worked, with her applying a very analytical approach to situations that are intuitive for other people -- but it's constantly undercut by Alice going on about how she can't hold a conversation and doesn't like talking to people. Felt like autism was being watered down to "can't talk to people disorder".
I wasn't really expecting a rollercoaster, but the plot was pretty predictable. Even the author seemed to feel like it, because the theoretical climax of the plot fell apart TWICE before we got the big action sequence (which was barely over 20 pages and very easily resolved). The world seems so quirky and fun but maybe because it's the third book the author was getting bored with it and just wanted to focus on the romance. Oh, well.
The one twist I did enjoy was
The book also gets strangely angsty in the last sequence with A.U.N.T., which didn't land especially well for me because I didn't feel as though we were adequately introduced to Alice and Daniel before they became obsessed with each other. I'm not really invested in them. It was also a jarring tonal shift that wasn't handled with a deft hand. Until the mission is over, the narration is just peppered with jokes about which particular regulations they're breaking by smooching. A.U.N.T. is treated as goofily as everything else. I didn't feel like they were in sincere jeopardy.
That being said, I know the kind of person who would enjoy this. It's super tropey, HEAVY HEAVY on romance, very cutesy, guaranteed to end with the characters married and pumping out babies. I probably would've loved this book when I was 14. It was readable, at least. Could've been great.
Minor: Child abuse
overflowingshelf's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Violence and Gun violence
Moderate: Physical abuse, Emotional abuse, Abandonment, Child abuse, and Pregnancy