Scan barcode
darlaslays's review against another edition
challenging
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
My opinion on this book is a bit complicated. It was both easy and difficult to read at the same time. It was engaging and interesting, but also dragged due to how much I disliked the main character.
I found myself getting super irritated at the numerous times the word, “crazy,” was used. The main character, Amy, is super unlikeable and dense. She’s supposed to be a third year medical student, but she doesn’t know a lot of basic information that you would already know as during undergrad, such as “sundowning.” She is clearly not very smart, so I don’t know how she made it into her graduate program. By the end of the book, it appears thatthe choice to make her annoying and hard to root for was intentional. Poor Will. If she were a real person, I’m sure Amy will eventually get help for her condition because living with untreated schizophrenia is impossible to hide as you get older. The conclusion ties everything together and made the slog worth it to me. However, it represents mental illness terribly.
I almost didn’t finish this book due to how the topic of mental health was covered. I also couldn’t suspend my disbelief on the unrealistic aspects of the ward or healthcare in general. I did appreciate when they sort of acknowledged that mentally ill patients are still people too.
Amy is very immature and has a terrible take on mental disorders. It does get reconciled in the end, but that reconciliation does demonize people who have schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. As someone with bipolar II, I felt irritated that the condition wasn’t accurately portrayed. I’ve had one horrible manic episode with psychosis and several hypomanic periods in my life, but it never led to violence on others. I wish it was clearly depicted that the mental disorders and the violent actions taken by the characters were separate issues.
The writing was clunky at times, and it read like a YA novel. Nothing wrong with that, but the characters certainly didn’t seem like they were mid-to-late twenty somethings. They felt more like teenagers. I definitely cringed at several lines sprinkled throughout the book. At other times, I loved the descriptions of the events unfolding.
All that being said, the twists were fun and interesting, albeit it left the story with plot holes. Focusing on them too much would have just taken my enjoyment away. I can see why people are a fan of McFadden’s writing overall. This is likely not her best work, though.
It’s a fun time, just don’t set your expectations high for realism and be prepared to roll your eyes at the main character’s inner thoughts and actions.
I found myself getting super irritated at the numerous times the word, “crazy,” was used. The main character, Amy, is super unlikeable and dense. She’s supposed to be a third year medical student, but she doesn’t know a lot of basic information that you would already know as during undergrad, such as “sundowning.” She is clearly not very smart, so I don’t know how she made it into her graduate program. By the end of the book, it appears that
I almost didn’t finish this book due to how the topic of mental health was covered. I also couldn’t suspend my disbelief on the unrealistic aspects of the ward or healthcare in general. I did appreciate when they sort of acknowledged that mentally ill patients are still people too.
Amy is very immature and has a terrible take on mental disorders. It does get reconciled in the end, but that reconciliation does demonize people who have schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. As someone with bipolar II, I felt irritated that the condition wasn’t accurately portrayed. I’ve had one horrible manic episode with psychosis and several hypomanic periods in my life, but it never led to violence on others. I wish it was clearly depicted that the mental disorders and the violent actions taken by the characters were separate issues.
The writing was clunky at times, and it read like a YA novel. Nothing wrong with that, but the characters certainly didn’t seem like they were mid-to-late twenty somethings. They felt more like teenagers. I definitely cringed at several lines sprinkled throughout the book. At other times, I loved the descriptions of the events unfolding.
All that being said, the twists were fun and interesting, albeit it left the story with plot holes. Focusing on them too much would have just taken my enjoyment away. I can see why people are a fan of McFadden’s writing overall. This is likely not her best work, though.
It’s a fun time, just don’t set your expectations high for realism and be prepared to roll your eyes at the main character’s inner thoughts and actions.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Confinement, Mental illness, Violence, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Ableism, Death, Physical abuse, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Dementia, Death of parent, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Racism
The violence isn’t gratuitous, but people are restrained and beaten, brutally killed, or found dead.bsparx's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Do you ever finish a book and have the reaction of, “Oh! You son of a….“?? That was my reaction when I finished Ward D. In the epilogue. Now it wasn’t a disappointed reaction. It was an intrigued, ‘you actually had me fooled‘ reaction. Do know how rarely I have those?
I noticed the reviews about Ward D are mixed, which I can understand. It becomes clear, early on, that our protagonist is an unreliable narrator. They’re not for everyone and sometimes a reader needs more patience to get through what seems like a potentially annoying character flaw. However, when you get through it, realise it’s an unreliable narrator, sometimes you can be so pleasantly surprised.
Amy, our protagonist, comes across as being very unsure of herself. She lacks confidence and, eventually, I suspected she had an undiagnosed anxiety disorder. I have anxiety myself. Reading Amy’s thoughts was akin to listening to my own thoughts. They weren’t the same, mind you, but they were exhausting. They were all over the place. I was like, “girl, you need some lexapro or something.” My thoughts and then Amy’s downward spiral was not a good mix. This was the point I had a break.
I enjoyed the other characters. They’re all very interesting, a little kooky, and questionable. About halfway through I didn’t trust any of the characters. I didn’t trust the main character. I had built up several theories and, in my experience, they’re usually right, but this time I was wrong! So wrong, and so good that I was!
Now, as someone who has a gazillion mental illnesses, I feel I can comment on the fact the story is set in a psychiatric ward (never had the actual experience though) with characters who have mental illness and disorders. I think, if you take things a certain way, you could be a tad offended by some of the mental illness portrayal. This is granted in some stories. However I don’t feel this is the way with Ward D. I feel the way McFadden wrote about diagnoses and treatment, from Amy’s perspective, was open-minded and in the positive. Amy actually learnt some things by the end of the story, which is great.
I found Ward D very easy to read. It grabbed my attention straight away and had momentum. If I was a person who was able to sit for long periods of time, and didn’t prize my sleep, I would have easily finished this book in one sitting. As it was, I finished it in just over one day, and still got my sleep. And now I want to read another McFadden novel.
I noticed the reviews about Ward D are mixed, which I can understand. It becomes clear, early on, that our protagonist is an unreliable narrator. They’re not for everyone and sometimes a reader needs more patience to get through what seems like a potentially annoying character flaw. However, when you get through it, realise it’s an unreliable narrator, sometimes you can be so pleasantly surprised.
Amy, our protagonist, comes across as being very unsure of herself. She lacks confidence and, eventually, I suspected she had an undiagnosed anxiety disorder. I have anxiety myself. Reading Amy’s thoughts was akin to listening to my own thoughts. They weren’t the same, mind you, but they were exhausting. They were all over the place. I was like, “girl, you need some lexapro or something.” My thoughts and then Amy’s downward spiral was not a good mix. This was the point I had a break.
I enjoyed the other characters. They’re all very interesting, a little kooky, and questionable. About halfway through I didn’t trust any of the characters. I didn’t trust the main character. I had built up several theories and, in my experience, they’re usually right, but this time I was wrong! So wrong, and so good that I was!
Now, as someone who has a gazillion mental illnesses, I feel I can comment on the fact the story is set in a psychiatric ward (never had the actual experience though) with characters who have mental illness and disorders. I think, if you take things a certain way, you could be a tad offended by some of the mental illness portrayal. This is granted in some stories. However I don’t feel this is the way with Ward D. I feel the way McFadden wrote about diagnoses and treatment, from Amy’s perspective, was open-minded and in the positive. Amy actually learnt some things by the end of the story, which is great.
I found Ward D very easy to read. It grabbed my attention straight away and had momentum. If I was a person who was able to sit for long periods of time, and didn’t prize my sleep, I would have easily finished this book in one sitting. As it was, I finished it in just over one day, and still got my sleep. And now I want to read another McFadden novel.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Bullying, Chronic illness, Confinement, Mental illness, Blood, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Gaslighting, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Medical content and Murder
Minor: Addiction and Dementia
hannnah_reads's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Bullying, Child abuse, Confinement, Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Medical content, Grief, Medical trauma, Death of parent, Murder, Gaslighting, and Toxic friendship
weebspec's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Gaslighting, and Toxic friendship
fableworm's review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
This book had me in a chokehold i couldn’t put it down
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Bullying, Child abuse, Confinement, Cursing, Death, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Gore, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Physical abuse, Toxic relationship, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Medical content, Dementia, Grief, Medical trauma, Death of parent, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
insideunder's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism, Child abuse, Confinement, Cursing, Death, Mental illness, Blood, Death of parent, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Drug abuse, Emotional abuse, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Medical content, Dementia, Medical trauma, Gaslighting, and Injury/Injury detail
depsy34's review against another edition
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
0.25
Holy crap on a cracker! I don’t usually bother to take the time to review books I rate this low but this one deserved it. It will also be the final Frieda book I read.
I had issues with previous Frieda books but they were normally minor. My major gripes have been the inability to realise it isn't necessary to pull off a ‘big twist’ at the end if it feels painfully and illogically forced in, among a few other little issues.
I actually loved at least one of Frieda's other books until the epilogue where the writing DESPERATELY tries to surprise you. It's never done well and all of the ‘twists’ are at the expense of the rest of the book.
This time I was already annoyed at the start of the book. We expect to suspend some credulity when reading a thriller. A character will make a dumb choice. Some unexpected thing (like lights going out) will happen.
With Ward D you are expected to take your credulity, shove it in a toilet, flush it, race it down to the sewage plant where you beat it up, put it in a bag, hand it to the mafia and have them go make it ‘sleep with the fishes.’
I’ll start with things which I considered ‘annoying but not entirely unreasonable for a thriller’:
1. The idea that on a psychiatric ward there is an intense and loud BUZZ every time someone enters or exits. – No. Do you have any idea about mental illness? Fun fact, a lot of psychiatric disorders include some kind of struggle with loud or unexpected noises. This is NOT a thing.
2. The entire time the main character acts like it is so hard to find her fellow doctor / anyone. Psych wards aren’t that large. OR if they are, they have HEAPS of staff on them. You think they just want it easy for people struggling with their mental health to hide?
3. Our MC is MEANT to be a doctor candidate. At LEAST they are meant to SMART. As usually, the writing tries to TELL us the MC is clever, while failing to follow through at all.
4. MULTIPLE TIMES the MC says ‘against my character’ or similar and does something idiotic. This is such lazy writing it HURTS.
5. We’re expected to believe that a psych ward, as part of a hospital, goes into basic shutdown / can’t be accessed if the power goes out?
Things I can’t overlook:
1. The elaborate plot for the sake of it. The criminals can already escape but stay in the ward to play with the MC?
2. Red Jelly vs Blood. Absolutely not. If you can be gaslit that easily you wouldn’t be a doctor. As many other reviews have pointed out – tomato sauce, hot sauce etc there were far better choices!
3. The “Twist at the end”. Oh! My! God! Honestly, even though the rest of the book was trash, I was about to breathe a sigh of relief and say ‘at least there isn’t an attempt to shoehorn something stupid in’ and THEN the FUCKING TWIST!
Fun fact – you can’t have an unreliable narrator who turns ‘reliable’ at the end. Either she NEVER acknowledges the little girl OR we see her throughout. For a hot second I enjoyed the idea that the MC had been drugged and that was why she saw the little girl, but NO we were meant to believe the MC who has been narrating to NO ONE was ignoring this hallucination the whole time. Basically – she was there but you didn’t see her but she was also telling me what to do! It’s not clever, it‘s lazy, gross and BAD.
Finally, I didn’t know before this book that Sheila is an actual practicing DOCTOR! With that in mind – this book is the most disgusting portrayal of mental health issues I’ve seen in a VERY long time! Not to mention the contradiction of the MC repeatedly talking about how you can’t ‘trust people who see things’ while very unsubtly telling us ‘people with mental illness get addicted to things’ and placing a peach iced tea in a brick and beating you over the head with it.
The portrayal of mental illnesses and the psychiatric ward is disgusting, from a doctor it makes me think she really needs some additional training and education about mental illness.
I’m done with Mcfadden's books but saddened that anyone would think this was good writing, clever writing or a good thriller. Much less acceptable in 2024 when talking about mental health.
I had issues with previous Frieda books but they were normally minor. My major gripes have been the inability to realise it isn't necessary to pull off a ‘big twist’ at the end if it feels painfully and illogically forced in, among a few other little issues.
I actually loved at least one of Frieda's other books until the epilogue where the writing DESPERATELY tries to surprise you. It's never done well and all of the ‘twists’ are at the expense of the rest of the book.
This time I was already annoyed at the start of the book. We expect to suspend some credulity when reading a thriller. A character will make a dumb choice. Some unexpected thing (like lights going out) will happen.
With Ward D you are expected to take your credulity, shove it in a toilet, flush it, race it down to the sewage plant where you beat it up, put it in a bag, hand it to the mafia and have them go make it ‘sleep with the fishes.’
I’ll start with things which I considered ‘annoying but not entirely unreasonable for a thriller’:
1. The idea that on a psychiatric ward there is an intense and loud BUZZ every time someone enters or exits. – No. Do you have any idea about mental illness? Fun fact, a lot of psychiatric disorders include some kind of struggle with loud or unexpected noises. This is NOT a thing.
2. The entire time the main character acts like it is so hard to find her fellow doctor / anyone. Psych wards aren’t that large. OR if they are, they have HEAPS of staff on them. You think they just want it easy for people struggling with their mental health to hide?
3. Our MC is MEANT to be a doctor candidate. At LEAST they are meant to SMART. As usually, the writing tries to TELL us the MC is clever, while failing to follow through at all.
4. MULTIPLE TIMES the MC says ‘against my character’ or similar and does something idiotic. This is such lazy writing it HURTS.
5. We’re expected to believe that a psych ward, as part of a hospital, goes into basic shutdown / can’t be accessed if the power goes out?
Things I can’t overlook:
1. The elaborate plot for the sake of it. The criminals can already escape but stay in the ward to play with the MC?
2. Red Jelly vs Blood. Absolutely not. If you can be gaslit that easily you wouldn’t be a doctor. As many other reviews have pointed out – tomato sauce, hot sauce etc there were far better choices!
3. The “Twist at the end”. Oh! My! God! Honestly, even though the rest of the book was trash, I was about to breathe a sigh of relief and say ‘at least there isn’t an attempt to shoehorn something stupid in’ and THEN the FUCKING TWIST!
Fun fact – you can’t have an unreliable narrator who turns ‘reliable’ at the end. Either she NEVER acknowledges the little girl OR we see her throughout. For a hot second I enjoyed the idea that the MC had been drugged and that was why she saw the little girl, but NO we were meant to believe the MC who has been narrating to NO ONE was ignoring this hallucination the whole time. Basically – she was there but you didn’t see her but she was also telling me what to do! It’s not clever, it‘s lazy, gross and BAD.
Finally, I didn’t know before this book that Sheila is an actual practicing DOCTOR! With that in mind – this book is the most disgusting portrayal of mental health issues I’ve seen in a VERY long time! Not to mention the contradiction of the MC repeatedly talking about how you can’t ‘trust people who see things’ while very unsubtly telling us ‘people with mental illness get addicted to things’ and placing a peach iced tea in a brick and beating you over the head with it.
The portrayal of mental illnesses and the psychiatric ward is disgusting, from a doctor it makes me think she really needs some additional training and education about mental illness.
I’m done with Mcfadden's books but saddened that anyone would think this was good writing, clever writing or a good thriller. Much less acceptable in 2024 when talking about mental health.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Domestic abuse, Mental illness, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , and Toxic friendship
steepedpages's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Mental illness, Blood, Murder, and Schizophrenia/Psychosis
Moderate: Toxic friendship
Minor: Child abuse and Self harm
theycallmerash's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
This book was very exciting, nerve wracking, and tense! Some information about the narrator makes her seem somewhat unreliable which is always a fun read in my opinion. Of course it wouldn't be Freida without a big twist (and another one at the very end that you weren't expecting!)
I did take a point away for some of the mental health portrayals and a couple stretches past the imagination.
But otherwise this was an interesting read with lots of shocking twists!
I did take a point away for some of the mental health portrayals and a couple stretches past the imagination.
But otherwise this was an interesting read with lots of shocking twists!
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Mental illness, Blood, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Addiction, Child abuse, Violence, Fire/Fire injury, and Abandonment
alyssams884's review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Mental illness, Forced institutionalization, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Gaslighting, and Toxic friendship