Scan barcode
cody240fc's review against another edition
4.0
Perceptions, misunderstandings, miscommunication and intertwined relationships. All of these things affect each of us on a daily basis; probably more than we can appreciate. Mathews' novel explores these themes with a flourishing story line and a style that I have trouble describing. Mathew's is considered an experimentalist writer, but I believe that to be true about the structure of this novel rather than the prose itself. But I do love that prose. Just the slightest touch of humor here as well; really just a trace which fits perfectly with these characters he has created. I didn't love all of the characters though; could've done with less Lewis. Phoebe too. Ironically they are probably the two essential characters. They complicate the hell out of everything. But Maude, Elizabeth, Allan, Irene and Walter are all great.
I was surprised with the powerful ending. For some reason Mathews' style suggested he might make light of our silly tendencies. Instead he draws on the power of relationships and their longstanding impacts (or consequences). I need to read more Mathews.
A meaningful passage that I am really writing down for my own benefit; to remind my future self about Mathews talents:
I was only beginning to learn that the dead stay everlastingly present among us, taking the form of palpable vacancies that only disappear when, as we must, we take them into ourselves. We take the dead inside us; we fill their voids with our own substance; we become them. The living dead do not belong to a race of fantasy, they constitute the inhabitants of our earth. The longer we live, the more numerous the inviting holes death opens in our lives and the more we add to the death inside us, until at last we embody nothing else. And when we in turn die, those who survive embody us, the whole of us, our individual selves and the crowd of dead men and women we have carried within us.
I was surprised with the powerful ending. For some reason Mathews' style suggested he might make light of our silly tendencies. Instead he draws on the power of relationships and their longstanding impacts (or consequences). I need to read more Mathews.
A meaningful passage that I am really writing down for my own benefit; to remind my future self about Mathews talents:
I was only beginning to learn that the dead stay everlastingly present among us, taking the form of palpable vacancies that only disappear when, as we must, we take them into ourselves. We take the dead inside us; we fill their voids with our own substance; we become them. The living dead do not belong to a race of fantasy, they constitute the inhabitants of our earth. The longer we live, the more numerous the inviting holes death opens in our lives and the more we add to the death inside us, until at last we embody nothing else. And when we in turn die, those who survive embody us, the whole of us, our individual selves and the crowd of dead men and women we have carried within us.
als_adventures's review against another edition
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
4.25
Complex and fast and fun and chaotic.
sorrelnorwood's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
reflective
slow-paced
3.5
kevreads's review against another edition
mysterious
reflective
relaxing
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
3.5
paulcowdell's review
4.0
This was probably a 3.5 for me. It's not my favourite Mathews by a long way, lacking the capricious spring of The Sinking of the Odradek Stadium, say, and being much more in the nature of a Work of Literary Fiction (which is one of the most damning insults I can level against any book). Mathews's approach to construction, however (as with all of the Oulipians) means that even such an end result is driven in a way it's generally not by the Creative Writing Studies crowds. This reads like a geometrically organised take on the 19th century triple-decker or mid-20th century modernist novels of social intrigue, and the resultant collapsing in on themselves of the Chinese boxes of plots is hugely satisfying. In a way that's my biggest gripe against the Oulipians: when they work at their best (Perec's big novels), or even somewhere slightly below that (here) they often produce novels that are way better than they have any right to be.
kingfan30's review against another edition
3.0
Did not get on as well with this book as I thought. I like the idea about each chapter exploring the different relationships between two of the characters but as I read through, I found it hard to remember how each character was related to others I had already read about.
jacob_wren's review against another edition
5.0
.
http://quarterlyconversation.com/tch-tch-notes-on-cigarettes
.
http://quarterlyconversation.com/tch-tch-notes-on-cigarettes
.
thebobsphere's review
3.0
Honestly I can't remember this one - except that I had trouble 'connecting' with it, Unfortunately a big problem I have with experimental novels.
More...