Reviews

The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown

zaisgraph's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark funny mysterious reflective relaxing fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Rereading The Da Vinci Code in 2023

Column by Me, Zai Zai 

Reading The Da Vinci Code as an adult with far greater comprehension is a markedly different experience altogether. Full disclosure my kid mind was simply BLOWN by all the stuff brought up here in the early 2000s (after stanning the Catholic Church for the longest time haha!)

Now, I feel like this is a Middle Grade level adventure presented as FAR, FAR more complicated than it actually is LOL. All the conspiracy stuff in Da Vinci is practically entry level and WOULD NOT need a high caliber expert to solve lol. I mean a mirror (reverse image) puzzle??? C'mon!!! Usborne Puzzle Adventures did it first and waaaay better.

The ridiculousness of Robert's and Sophie's plot armor is also jarring. I mean neither of them was in any real trouble. Some say it was the hand of something divine or is it lazy anime writing? LoL. Honestly, it's just NOT realistic in this day and age to side with any problematic religion. I mean yeahhh why would an omnipotent being protect a sex cult? Is that the final form of man's faith? How would gays and children participate? The questions just write themselves. 

Overlooking the stuff I have just said I can understand why this book became not just popular but a phenomenon. However, this book DID NOT AGE VERY WELL. It felt and read like a product of it's time when the themes it discussed had a far larger bearing.

It's fun to make more out of things. Maybe there's more to them, but most of the time what things are is what they really are. A painting is just a painting. Less fun I know. The Da Vinci Code perfectly encapsulated this built in side quest of humanity. It is mindless fun. But you know if this novel encourages people to keep poking at established stuff I am still all for it because we can't pretend understand in full the intricacies of our art and history. 3 stars.

My Good Reads:
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/143356683-zai-zai

emmarn's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous relaxing fast-paced

3.0

chayfranzii's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Mir hats sehr gefallen. Sehr spannend und für jemanden der Kunstgeschichte studiert einfach faszinierend, wie Brown das alles eingewoben hat.

laura_storyteller's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

jensaperstein's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I need to clarify my rating. I rated this four stars for what it's supposed to be: a crime, mystery, thriller novel. I think it's a damn good one at that, too.

I don't think that it convinced me that Jesus had a son, or that Mary Magdalene and him were married, or anything like that. I don't think it changed the face of religion in the world as we know it.

I DO think that it was extremely interesting and a teeny bit eye-opening, just in the respect that it gets you thinking about these things and the possibility that the Church could be stuff that it's not supposed to be--which some Catholics certainly don't realize.

SO: four stars because I loved reading it and it drew me in to find out what happened in the end. Not five stars, because it didn't live up to the "enlightening" claims and such.

a_vysotska's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous informative

4.75

stachmou77's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

It was really predictable. The simple facts that I could debunked all of the mysteries around Jesus and Marie Madeleine and the theories about all of the paintings mentionned, was just cringy because the main character is supposed to be a well-known historian. So at some point it didn't make sense to me.

I'm not even mad to put it in my DNF.

beepsatsheep's review

Go to review page

adventurous informative mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

claracafetot1's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional informative mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

ayafaham3's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous informative mysterious reflective medium-paced

4.75