Scan barcode
molsreads's review against another edition
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
4.0
I liked this a lot. Major Stephen King’s It vibes. Loved the friendship between the kids. Some seriously spooky moments.
But a few things really irritated me…lots of describing fat folks in really grotesque ways. Also there is a story of a lynching with lots of slurs, could have done without that. I understand it was set in 1960 but still. Geeze. He also killed off one of my favorite characters about halfway through.
But a few things really irritated me…lots of describing fat folks in really grotesque ways. Also there is a story of a lynching with lots of slurs, could have done without that. I understand it was set in 1960 but still. Geeze. He also killed off one of my favorite characters about halfway through.
Graphic: Animal death, Child death, Death, Fatphobia, Gore, Racial slurs, Racism, Violence, Murder, and Fire/Fire injury
lunarmagi42's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
The beginning is a bit slow but about a third of the way in, boy does it get going! The tension and the scare factor kept building and building the way all the best horror books do until it reached a very satisfying conclusion with only a few pages left in the book. This book is absolutely worth a read if you're a Stephen King fan, especially if you live in a farming town, even more so if you live in the Midwest. I could have done without the sort of sexual description of a 12 year old girl, but given the book is from the perspective of 11/12 year old boys, I guess it makes sense even if it's gross.
Graphic: Animal death, Child death, Gore, Gun violence, Violence, and Blood
Moderate: Body horror, Cursing, Racism, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
tlbignerd's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
hopeful
inspiring
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Alcoholism, Body horror, Death, Gore, Physical abuse, Violence, Grief, and Murder
Minor: Abandonment
katjoyphil's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Animal death, Bullying, Child death, Fatphobia, Gore, and Racial slurs
cassieyorke's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
reflective
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
One of the first lessons I've had on the craft of writing horror, and a pretty good one. My favorite kind of horror is the kind that deals with the distant past, and Simmons does this really well - he looks at a haunted past through the lens of pre-adolescent kids. He identifies with his protagonists so much that even his narrative and world-building take on that ominous, dangerous tone and those shadows that lurk on the edges of an incomplete, frightening view of times long gone. The whole book is speckled with these little glimpses, and that spreads a pall of fright over the whole book.
If I could have given 4.5 stars, I would have. The only .5 I marked off for was that the narrative, while it pulled me along really well, wasn't what I would have called gripping or compelling in a really feverish way. Still, Simmons showed a real deftness for talking about so many different times, switching language appropriately for a sense of immersion. But his real skill is in conjuring dread of things out in the dark. I have to say that I ended up liking this a lot more than Stephen King's It, not least because Simmons manages to tell a scary story - in the exact same time period as It and with similar protagonists, but without the skeeve factor. He also does what I thought was a superior job of putting dread in days gone by, and of writing protagonists who are universally relatable.
Summer of Night is my go-to writer's manual for creating a scary yesterday and an equally unsettling present.
If I could have given 4.5 stars, I would have. The only .5 I marked off for was that the narrative, while it pulled me along really well, wasn't what I would have called gripping or compelling in a really feverish way. Still, Simmons showed a real deftness for talking about so many different times, switching language appropriately for a sense of immersion. But his real skill is in conjuring dread of things out in the dark. I have to say that I ended up liking this a lot more than Stephen King's It, not least because Simmons manages to tell a scary story - in the exact same time period as It and with similar protagonists, but without the skeeve factor. He also does what I thought was a superior job of putting dread in days gone by, and of writing protagonists who are universally relatable.
Summer of Night is my go-to writer's manual for creating a scary yesterday and an equally unsettling present.
Graphic: Body horror, Bullying, Child death, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Grief, Medical trauma, and Murder