Scan barcode
sabinehunter's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Death, Incest, Sexual content, Violence, Kidnapping, and Fire/Fire injury
hiba_biba's review against another edition
Graphic: Incest
katebrownreads's review against another edition
2.5
Graphic: Incest
zabeishumanish's review against another edition
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
3.5
Extra big warning for the *incest*. The two men in the group are twin brothers. Nothing more than a kiss takes place on the page, but more graphic intimacy is discussed.
I had to remind myself constantly through this book that ancient supernatural beings aren't beholden to human decorum, but damn this book wasn't it for me. The book was technically well written for the type of book that it is, but this book is NOT everyone's cup of tea. The author definitely should have put more information about the content of this book upfront given the extra taboo nature of most of the book.
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Gore, Incest, Sexual content, Violence, Kidnapping, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, and Injury/Injury detail
libraryofpeculiar's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
3.75
Maybe author should have clarified that the taboo theme in this one is motherfucking twincest... that was really off putting. As a twin, I have to say this is where I draw the line lmao. Please leave incest in Alabama.
Gotta be honest for the most part I pretended they were really tight and close best buddies and I tried to ignore the fact Dalus and Icarus were twins. What also made this book bearable for me was the fact the almost did not interact with each other sexually, they kiss on the neck and lips once and that's it. They mostly just share Melody. I swear if there were fucking each other I would probably DNF or rate it one star.
But yeah, smut was amazing and it was written well like all other books. BUT WHY INCEST?! WHY?!
Graphic: Cursing, Incest, Sexual content, and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Death, Violence, and Murder
chilivanilli28's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Incest and Kidnapping
litandlayne's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Incest
grilledcheesd's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Graphic: Incest and Sexual content
Moderate: Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Kidnapping
potalian's review against another edition
2.75
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Incest, Kidnapping, and Fire/Fire injury
booksdogsandcoffee's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
3.5
This one had me nervous because it was twins. Personally it just isn’t my thing, and it wasn’t really as bad as I had thought it was going to be in my head.
There is incest, just not shown on the page. I enjoyed learning more about the Baristas plot line and seeing familiar faces show up. Evan’s does a great job weaving a story through out her spicy scenes. As my friend said, come for the smut, stay for the plot line!
Graphic: Incest, Sexual assault, and Sexual content