Reviews tagging 'Child abuse'

De Shining by Stephen King

277 reviews

szeglin's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

thatgirlinblack's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

A heart-tugging book delving into the inner workings of a family complicated with unresolved childhood traumas and paranormal tendencies. King can certainly write horror but his flawed moralizing (like with IT) drags stars off the book. More on that later. 

The hotel is much more of an actively working, malevolent force than in the famous movie and yet many of the iconic visuals are different or missing. 

-The iconic ax is a roque mallet. 
-There's no river of blood, but there is a splatter of blood and brains on a wall where a ghost committed su*cide. 
-There IS a caretaker who killed his family and helps corrupt Jack but Danny never sees the dead twins. 
-The maze doesn’t exist but a topiary of hedge animals causes more than enough menace and destruction.  
-Not a movie mention of the crazy man in a silver dog suit whose treatment succinctly displays the twisted minds of the hotel’s famous guests. 
-Halloran & Jack have vastly different (& interesting) arcs and ends. 

Jack’s self-pitying narratives were annoying while the thoughts of longsuffering, devoted wife and mother Wendy were tragic and the parts in Danny’s curious, expanding little boy brain were exciting as he figures out his “shining” power. 

“He felt that he had unwittingly stuck his hand into The Great Wasps’ Nest of Life.” Jack Torrance in the “passive mode” can’t possibly be held responsible for drinking himself into a stupor, or a rage, and hurting people. Oh no, not poor Jack. 🙄 

In a sad reminiscence of how female victims of domestic violence constantly excuse their abusers, Wendy credits Jack’s infamous murderous rage to the hotel magically providing liquor rather than the fact that Jack consciously allowed his drinking problem to relapse. His attacks on her are so intense and bloody, yet she displays great determination through it all. 

Ultimately it was kinda irritating and idk if it’s because of his limited experience with domestic violence, but King’s slant that Jack was really just some good ol’ dude who unfortunately fell upon hard times and was bewitched by evil falls flat with the countless documented examples of men who neglect their families through drinking and violence ~while in their very right minds~ 

The problem with blaming Jack’s destructive turn on the Overlook is that he was already impatient (snapping at Wendy in his head), selfish (neglecting his family to stay out late drinking), violent (beating up his student), a sop (willingly drank when the hotel provided it), and destructive (picking fights with his employer to could pursue his passion project book on the hotel) on his own; even if he was trying to turn over a new leaf, his own moral fortitude failed and the hotel just nudged him along. 

While Wendy had her own anxious tendencies, her possible overprotectiveness (but not her lack of trust in the drunken, angry man that was her husband) could’ve been addressed if Jack actually communicated with her. Instead, he complained in his head, fantasized about hitting her, and lustfully danced with Sexy Hotel Ghost Lady. 

As a survivor, I can confirm that real-life abusive men are way more scary than any hotel ghosts. Quite frankly, it’s unnecessary and insulting to go to bat for these rnen. 

The horror aspect is very well done, though, obviously. The slow burn ratchets up to a frantic pace as the party rages and the hotel comes to life, growing stronger. The redemptive end to the story is much more meaningful, in both a bittersweet and uplifting way, than the movie. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

disauci's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

eadrianschmitz's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

<Spoiler>
At first I was like omg ok I get it, he's an alcoholic. But then the emphasis made sense. I kind of wish it had been Jack that unravelled on his own rather than the hotel's fault for possessing him. Still a wonderful read and quite different from the film! 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

karichan10's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

enysomen's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jaimc's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

dangarias's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

katiesmooncanvas's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

itshrewsbury's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

5.0

 I read the first of the Dark Tower series a while ago and thought I’d never read Steven king again. He just has a way of writing that is really evocative, but often…weird? Not in a sci fi/horror/thriller concept way but in a, “why do you always write women like THAT” way, in a “oh there’s this harmful trope again” way; it got repetitive and I had to stop reading him for a bit. But this was honestly SO good that I was able to push through the weird moments, and I think it’s bc you get so many POV characters with clear and fleshed out intentions here. Plus the tension just flows SO well, I actually was so stiff the whole back half.
The old saying about books always being better than their movies rings really true here (though I do adore the Kubrick movie, regardless). I loved how different the two are! 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings