Reviews tagging 'Death'

Men at Arms by Terry Pratchett

11 reviews

prettiestwhistles's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kappafrog's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.75

Pratchett is one of my favourite authors, but this was really disappointing. The gender/sexual politics were a little dull 30 years on but took a really unpleasant turn late in the book.
Carrot becoming Angua's master after they slept together was disgusting.
The mystery was confusing and I gave up trying to figure it out myself. I really didn't like the dog subplot. Also,
whatever happened to the people Cruces shot from the Tower of Art?


Bright spots were Detritus, Cuddy, and the Via Cloaca. And of course with Pratchett there were plenty of laugh out loud moments, like the Librarian playing the organ. Still, a rare dud from one of my favourite authors.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

theropfather's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny lighthearted mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

judassilver's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful lighthearted mysterious sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

smw33's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny lighthearted mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ampharos906's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

megmata's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

soupply's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny inspiring mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

woweewhoa's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Loveable characters? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bluejayreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous
  • Loveable characters? Yes

4.0

This book is difficult to review, for a couple reasons. One is that it's not particularly remarkable. I mean that in the sense that there's not a lot to remark on - it's still a solidly good book, with the absurd humor and wacky shenanigans you expect from a Discworld story. But nothing really jumped out at me to say "this is worth remarking about." 

I think a large part of that - and the second reason it's so hard to review - was because there were just so many characters running around. There's Corporal Carrot and Captain Vimes, of course, as well as Corporal Nobbs, all of whom I'm familiar with from the last City Guard book. Then there's the three new recruits, Lance-Constable Cuddy, Lance-Constable Detritus, and Lance-Constable Angua. The obnoxious talking dog from Moving Pictures is back and only slightly less obnoxious. And that's just the major characters! There's also an assortment of dwarves and trolls, some assassin's guild members, some fool's guild members, a couple beggar's guild members, Lord Vetinari, Lady Sibyl, and I'm sure a few more that I'm not remembering off the top of my head. 

With that many characters happening, the plot feels spread out and disjointed even though it really isn't. The main plot is a mystery, trying to figure out who is committing a series of murders and how they're doing it. There are also subplots of Captain Vimes' impending marriage, romance between Carrot and Angua (she's a woman and he's the protagonist of this sub-series, it was predictable), a brewing race war between dwarves and trolls, and also a scheme to depose Vetinari and put a king on the throne of Ankh-Morpork that's brought up in the beginning like it's going to be the main plot and then almost completely forgotten until the end. If this book only focused on Carrot, I think it could have been manageable. But with so many sub-plots spread out across so many characters, it lost a lot of its coherence and also a lot of its impact. 

It feels like this book is trying to do a lot of social commentary in a very small space. The Night Watch gets some "diversity hires," there's a plot to give Ankh-Morpork a king again, someone invents a gun. But this book is not spectacularly long and there's so much happening that very little actually came through clearly. The messages "kings = bad" and "guns make people more violent" came through, but not very strongly. The clearest message was in support of diversity. 

Don't get me wrong, this book is good. It's fun, entertaining, wacky, funny, and occasionally emotional. It's just trying to do more things than it has space for, and ends up feeling diluted and occasionally disconnected. It's still a perfectly solid book and a very enjoyable read - one of those that you don't really start to notice the issues until you try to write a book review about it - but I think it could have used a little streamlining. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings