Scan barcode
Reviews
Physics For Scientists And Engineers by John W. Jewett Jr., Raymond A. Serway, Robert J. Beichner
ralen356's review against another edition
I would like to give myself credit for surviving this book. Ie my physics class
dcunning11235's review against another edition
3.0
This was a decent book, but not great. My main issues with it were:
1.) I prefer more concise, math-first presentations for physics. This book had too many pictures; it had many small diagrams and "active figures" surrounded by description, but few large diagrams with e.g. concise descriptions, math in the text, etc.) Wasted space, and distracting!
2.) I wished that e.g. Maxwell's equations had both the integral AND vector/differential forms were given; this book doesn't go over the differential form, which is pretty darn standard.
I carried this book around a lot, so let me re-stress how important it is to be concise. That said, I did like many example problems in the text, with discussions of how to solve, etc (I actually wished there were a few harder ones.)
1.) I prefer more concise, math-first presentations for physics. This book had too many pictures; it had many small diagrams and "active figures" surrounded by description, but few large diagrams with e.g. concise descriptions, math in the text, etc.) Wasted space, and distracting!
2.) I wished that e.g. Maxwell's equations had both the integral AND vector/differential forms were given; this book doesn't go over the differential form, which is pretty darn standard.
I carried this book around a lot, so let me re-stress how important it is to be concise. That said, I did like many example problems in the text, with discussions of how to solve, etc (I actually wished there were a few harder ones.)
maritacov's review against another edition
4.0
Get an A in the class? Don't mind if I do. Although my teacher deserves way more credit than the book. I also had the study guide from the publisher and I found myself referencing that more than the book itself.
More...