readhaileyread's review

Go to review page

dark informative medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mondovertigo's review

Go to review page

challenging dark informative medium-paced

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

constancely's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative inspiring medium-paced

5.0

I loved every page of this book and have already recommended it to all my friends. In case anybody doubts whether it's boring or slow-paced at some points, it isn't. It's incredibly compelling and I certainly wasn't expecting to enjoy this book so much.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

katiemack's review

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

4.5

Book Riot Read Harder Challenge 2022: Read a history about a period you know little about.

I learned a lot about the early modern period in my college history classes and always thought the Tudors and the Stuarts had the most infamously scandalous drama. These two rival sixth-century queens make those families look like kids having petty squabbles.

It's clear that Puhak did a great deal of research for this book (even if, as she claims, it's more a work of narrative nonfiction than an academic treatise on the period). Upon reading the author's note about how little artifacts and primary sources there are for the Merovingian dynasty, her work is even more impressive. Puhak's narrative is informative yet entertaining; I feel like I learned a lot without having to slog through unnecessary details or tedious sidebars.

If you're interested in learning about strong women who have been hidden from history by the patriarchy, this one's for you. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

xandra_evelyn's review

Go to review page

dark informative tense medium-paced

3.5

This was a hard book to rate. Basically, the story writes itself - the author simply accumulated the known writings of these two queens and put it into a book.

However, Shelley Puhak (the author) admits this is "not an academic history; it is a work of narrative nonfiction" (171). As an historian, that didn't sit well with me. I also felt there were some analysis issues that a true historian would have navigated better. On a more petty note (but one that bothered me) her citations were rather unconventional, using page numbers and quotes rather than footnotes. (Ms. Puhak is not an historian, but is actually a poet, so that may explain some of it.)

Those are big things for me, but may be little things for non-historians. Overall, it's a good story. Like I said, the history is fascinating and writes itself.  Ms. Puhak was simply kind enough to compile it.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

alisonvh's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark informative medium-paced

5.0

This book is so good and I learned so much! Everyone should read it.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...