Reviews

The Schopenhauer Cure by Irvin D. Yalom

emileejean's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful informative inspiring reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

hanna_wiley's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

failedfocus's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional inspiring reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

daphnesayshi's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

2 narratives run alongside each other in The Schopenhauer Cure—that of present day Julian, making the best use of whatever remaining time he has left, and a look into the man himself, Schopenhauer and his life and the catalysts which would lead him to developing his own philosophy in life. And what life! Schopenhauer is a man with excess bitterness in life. A lot of his ideas are great, and the foundation upon which undoubtedly entire generations of thinkers have built upon, but his ideas would have been a lot more palatable if he had been a little more personable—a fact the book does point out too. At the risk of sounding like a dolt because I've never read Schopenhauer myself, I will say that the book endears itself to readers precisely because it attempts to mitigate the harshness of Schopenhauer's philosophy to the extent where comfort can actually be drawn. This mitigation is mostly successful, and is I would think what's best about the book. A lot less can be said about the end though: it's too haphazard, too well-resolved, almost as if I walked to the end of a metaphorical cliff unwittingly and dropped off the edge.

papriika's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

jlarrew's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

This was almost a DNF for me. I could not get into any of the parts about Schopenhauer at all. 

I liked Julius, but didn't understand why he wanted to connect with Philip.

Philip had the biggest arc. I still don't understand why he was a therapist.

I almost didn't finish and would have been on with that.

minatalaat's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

ثاني عمل أقرأه للكاتب، بعد " عندما بكى نيتشه
الرواية جيدة، لكنها مملة و طويلة بشكل لا يشجع أحد علي استكمالها من بعد الصفحة المائتى

hidelynch's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative inspiring reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

mnm2003's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

connorstory's review against another edition

Go to review page

A book of pretty low quality yet I nearly read the whole thing. It’s benefited by exploring such interesting ideas but so handicapped by clumsy, predictable and sometimes preposterous execution. Some really uninspired pros from an author who’s clearly so well read. Well, books can only teach so much, after all.