Scan barcode
gardens_and_dragons's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
5.0
It is a strange fable , with an ambiguous ending, but I think it is worth a read because of how much it packs into novella format.
Graphic: Racism, Transphobia, and Xenophobia
Moderate: Violence and Religious bigotry
Minor: Murder
booksillremember's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
But with this one, I feel it's trying to be too many things all at once.
The characters are too complex for it to work as a fable and too one-dimensional for it to work as a morally complex novel. The mix of show-don't-tell and tell-don't-show doesn't really work for me because neither feel fully fleshed out. The church people are ridiculously cringe and bigoted, whereas the more abstract commentary just feels preachy and sometimes a bit prerentious.
Graphic: Racism
Moderate: Sexual violence, Violence, Xenophobia, and Religious bigotry
biobeetle's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Xenophobia and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Animal death, Body shaming, Confinement, Death, Alcohol, Colonisation, and Classism
Minor: Dementia and Murder
lidia7's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
i was left with a lot of questions at the end, very spoiler heavy!! :
Graphic: Xenophobia and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Hate crime, Racism, and Transphobia
Minor: Animal death, Confinement, Medical content, and Murder
esalan's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.75
Moderate: Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, Violence, Xenophobia, Medical content, Religious bigotry, and Abandonment
Minor: Suicidal thoughts and Suicide attempt
rionstorm's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
The vibe of town and claustrophobic atmosphere were really nicely created, and the rythmic cycle of meeting character after character and hearing their story/confession/opinions surprising didn't get old, as I expected it would.
I found it interesting to try and work out the pattern in
There's some interesting themes touched on, including how limited our physical bodies are as a means to explain and understand our realities and experiences, the discomfort and quick jump to hostility when someone defies catagorisation, how much of identity is subjective and situational, and the interconnectedness of living creatures.
The ending
There's also, obviously, a trans/GNC/queer reading of the book. This is probably why I found it so difficult to refer to the main character as Pew, as it's a name that is given to them without any of their own input.
Overall really liked it. A lot of it is a bit meandering and philosophical, but it's also got wonderful, uncomfortable atmosphere building and some absolutely gorgeous writing. The most passages I've highlighted in a long time.
Graphic: Racism, Transphobia, Violence, Religious bigotry, and Murder
Moderate: Xenophobia, Death of parent, and War
Minor: Bullying, Eating disorder, Sexual violence, Terminal illness, Medical content, and Suicide attempt
ameronie's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Racism
Moderate: Alcoholism, Transphobia, Forced institutionalization, Xenophobia, Medical content, and Murder
savvylit's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
5.0
The congregants at the center of this novel are righteous and certain of their own goodness. Throughout Pew, their one-sided conversations with the stranger uncover the truth; that good intentions do not beget good actions. In a slow and foreboding fashion reminiscent of the horror genre, Lacey portrays the manipulative side of charity. When generosity was never asked for, who does it really serve and who does it harm?
Furthermore, Catherine Lacey has created a narrator who is unknown and ambiguous to both the book's characters and to readers. In doing so, Lacey has deftly revealed modern society's reliance on forcing individuals to conform to specific ways of being. Readers discover that this form of projection and pressure only creates opportunity for harm and animosity.
Pew is truly a masterwork of a novel that I will never forget. This particular copy was a library loan but I look forward to owning my very own copy. I think Pew would fit perfectly and seamlessly alongside books by Carson McCullers, Flannery O'Connor, and Shirley Jackson on my bookshelf.
Graphic: Racism, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, Xenophobia, Religious bigotry, Outing, Gaslighting, and Dysphoria
Moderate: Confinement, Hate crime, and Violence
rosalind's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Animal death
Moderate: Racism, Xenophobia, Grief, Religious bigotry, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Transphobia, Violence, and Medical content
annarose_'s review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
5.0
content/trigger warnings for transphobia, racism and xenophobia, mentions of lynching and sexual assault and (idk how to word this but) wanting to force a person to get undressed so they can 'understand what sort of person they are' (basically a sickening mix of assault and transphobia)
Graphic: Racism, Transphobia, Xenophobia, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Sexual assault and Sexual harassment