Scan barcode
Reviews tagging 'Terminal illness'
Одинокий город. Упражнения в искусстве одиночества by Шаши Мартынова, Shashi Martynova, Olivia Laing, Olivia Laing
7 reviews
marmelb's review against another edition
2.5
Graphic: Death, Sexual content, Terminal illness, and Pandemic/Epidemic
Moderate: Child abuse, Emotional abuse, Physical abuse, Rape, and Suicidal thoughts
renicula's review against another edition
4.0
Graphic: Abandonment
Moderate: Death, Emotional abuse, and Terminal illness
effievee's review against another edition
4.5
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Chronic illness, Drug abuse, Drug use, Gun violence, Mental illness, Pedophilia, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Terminal illness, Violence, Medical content, Grief, Medical trauma, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Addiction, Alcoholism, Racial slurs, Racism, Rape, Self harm, Alcohol, and Classism
savvylit's review against another edition
3.5
Where The Lonely City excels is in its biographical portraits of lonely artists. Beginning with Edward Hopper and Andy Warhol, Laing also compassionately portrays the lives of two lesser-known artists: Henry Darger and David Wojnarowicz. Laing's continued discussion of loneliness' relationship to these artists' creativity and community is extremely fascinating. The Lonely City constantly pushes readers to consider all the ways that someone can feel lonely or ostracized - even in a densely populated urban setting. Using the four aforementioned artists, she creates a very moving meditation on cultural normativity and it's inexorable connection to loneliness.
All that being said, I do think this book was a tad bloated. Like Laing's own walks around New York City described in this book, The Lonely City is quite meandering. I think this book would have benefited from focusing purely on biography and drawing conclusions from the artists' lives. However, Laing injects several random-seeming mentions of her own life which throw off the overall flow. For instance, she mentions a devastating breakup that she experienced - and then never discusses it again. I know it's definitely more than possible to weave personal anecdotes into biography. But in the case of The Lonely City, it is just not well-executed
Graphic: Death, Emotional abuse, Hate crime, Homophobia, Mental illness, Sexual assault, Terminal illness, Violence, and Medical trauma
tiagoalves's review against another edition
1.25
The blurb, that I read a few years ago, drew me in. Its first chapter, describing loneliness as a city in itself and beginning to explore that feeling in a city as born out of separation but also exposure was fantastic. Then Laing went into the biographical content that mostly built this book, rather than the memoir I was expecting alongside the study of loneliness in art.
We learn about the lives of Hopper, Warhol, Wojnarowicz, Solanas, Darger, and so on, but what we read is all very surface-level. It goes on interminable tangents that don’t seem to relate at all with the main point the book promises us, only then to fail miserably in considering the many nuances of loneliness, cowering solely behind the word ‘lonely’ and never having the boldness to explore anything else for over 250 pages.
This was researched, but the thing is that you can tell it was researched, and not in a good way. It reads as if Laing had googled ‘lonely’ and ‘new york’ and created an amalgamation of the results and divided them into chapters. The art analysis is paradoxically shallow and generic, while also being over-explained and too drawn out.
The problem is that Laing seems to promise to set out in one direction through the main road, but she chooses to go someplace else and uses a shortcut. She pours over an artist’s life for over 30 pages and then suddenly remembers “oh right, I have to relate this to loneliness and to me somehow” so she decides to say “this is why he was lonely and this is the same way I felt a few years after in the same street where he was once” and then dips. These short allusions to loneliness and to her own experience quickly started to feel like a cop out from actually reflecting on loneliness by herself—she resorted a bit too much to quotes from her sources and ended up not sharing much more than her generic, vague, and not too bound opinions.
Shout out to chapter six, which dealt with the HIV/AIDS epidemic, for being the best chapter in the book, but it couldn’t save this book.
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Child abuse, Confinement, Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Gun violence, Sexual violence, Terminal illness, Violence, and Blood
Moderate: Bullying, Domestic abuse, Rape, Suicidal thoughts, and Suicide attempt
Minor: Abandonment
ohlhauc's review against another edition
One of the strongest parts is that the art criticism is accessible so you don't need to know a lot about art, especially art and photography, to understand the commentary. The author guides the reader by not only explaining the works but also their context and impact. Another strong part is how the author continued to define loneliness with deeper levels of meaning rather than relying on one definition, and doing so by looking at other forces like privilege, oppression, class structures, stigma, and more. You won't see much discussion on mental health, which was an element that I felt was missing, but the other social forces were compelling, especially during the sections on forced institutionalization and the AIDS epidemic.
If you're interested in art criticism, in books about the AIDS epidemic, in loneliness in general, or how society can fail people who are different - this book is for you.
Graphic: Death, Homophobia, Terminal illness, Forced institutionalization, Grief, and Medical trauma
grtwrrn's review against another edition
4.0
Graphic: Alcoholism, Drug abuse, Drug use, Hate crime, Homophobia, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Terminal illness, Forced institutionalization, Grief, and Religious bigotry