Scan barcode
astrangewind's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Where Fractal Noise focuses on the fear of barren things, the unknown and unknowable, To Sleep focuses on... an alien spacesuit and intergalactic war. Really? I could read infinitely many other scifi books with an identical plot. That said, I know that there are many people out there who are into that kind of thing. I get that. But I feel like a lot of scifi authors tend to overdo their world-building; once you start describing the scary thing, it becomes worlds less scary. And having an alien supersuit that saves your life, stops you from feeling pain, heals people, grows plants, fixes machines, et cetera, becomes incredibly rote after the first dozen times it happens.
Speaking of rote, this book did not need to be 800+ pages. How many times do they scoot from one system to another, sometimes for no reason? How many times do the alien ships descend on them from "out of nowhere"? How many times is there an issue with the ship? a "serious" instance of cryo sickness? a life-threatening injury of one of the crew members that they "miraculously" live through? a member of the imperialist, beaurocracitc UMC acts like an imperialist beaurocrat until Kira expresses herself clearly and honestly, and then they throw all caution to the wind to believe her in total? (More than once, I'll tell you that much.) Paolini's editors needed to hit this one harder, I think.
Kira's relationships with others convinces me that Paolini has never been in love or had a sibling. Kira's sister doesn't come up often, but when she does, the interactions are stilted. (I have never once called my sister "sis." I do, however, call her "bro" roughly once per day.) Sibling dynamics aside, Kira's relationship with Alan is not well-defined and very awkward. (Who the hell uses "babe" as a term of endearment when you're both crying in a serious, terrifying moment? So weird.)
In the first half of the book, I found it hard to understand why people trust Kira. She causes repeated problems
I'm for sure ragging on Paolini because I'm comparing this book against a more recent, obviously better book of his. His strengths do appear in this book, too. To Sleep ends in the only way it could have. He is not afraid of leaving questions unanswered.
Ultimately, I don't regret reading this book, but the additional context did kind of ruin Fractal Noise for me, it should have been half as long, and it was generally mediocre.
Graphic: Death, Violence, Xenophobia, Blood, and War
Moderate: Confinement, Cursing, Genocide, Gore, Torture, Vomit, Medical content, Grief, Medical trauma, and Colonisation
Minor: Gore, Panic attacks/disorders, Sexual content, Terminal illness, and Cannibalism
panickedhonking's review against another edition
Graphic: Body horror, Confinement, Physical abuse, Torture, Medical content, Medical trauma, and Injury/Injury detail
redbeanm0chi's review against another edition
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.25
Moderate: Body horror and Torture
akfowly's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
In the end I think I might have enjoyed the book? I have some quibbles about Kira's fate. It felt almost a little like it leaned too hard into a few tropes about women, but it was still unexpected and creative. I read this as part of a christmas present for my mom, so it wasn't my first choice of a book, and if it hadn't been for that I probably would have stopped reading before part 1 ended. For an almost 900 page book, it lacks heavily in character development.
Also, I don't care for the world-building info-dump I discovered at the end of the book when I went back to check a couple things for this review -- if you want to tell me that a pepper was cultivated by someone before they won a 'tri-solar hot pepper bash', incorporate it in the text.
Important: I don't care for the way Paolini portrayed the non-white characters and women in this book, to be completely honest. There were definitely moments where Kira's perspective felt uncomfortable to read, and pulled me out of the flow as I was reminded that a man wrote her, especially as she was perceiving herself and some of the male characters. Also when she had 'emotions' she felt less believable/real than the (2/3 male-coded) maybe more robot-than-human ship minds. It felt a little like she spent the entire book (which covers maybe up to a couple years of time? Hard to follow the timeline between her dissociating and the cryo gaps, tbh) dissociating from shock, and viewing the world through a looking glass.
In general the romance aspects of this book felt clunky and unrealistic/lacked emotion**, and even as an avid romance reader, I could have done without it. On the note of Hwa Jung, I did not care for her portrayal - it felt at times like a series of microaggressions rather than a whole person. Kira's own heritage is only alluded to via her last name, so it felt a little bit checkboxy, i.e. they are not white because that's what's 'in' vs. creating full and complete intentional characters. Also felt pretty uncomfortable about the other two romances - Hwa Jung and Sparrow felt like another 'diversity' checkbox, and the Dr. who was being antagonized by the gal and then suddenly they were having sex and then engaged to be married felt...bizarre to say the least.
My other big quibble is that a huge twist in the book relies really heavily on unreliable narrator and hinges pretty heavily on something that in my opinion is actually a moment where he figured it out at the end and forgot to make sure the beginning still fit the timing right. Without giving spoilers, it has to do with the timing of Kira's first and subsequent contact experiences and the origin of something that I don't think quite fits with the explanation at the end.
Graphic: Death, Gun violence, Torture, Violence, Blood, Murder, War, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Body horror
Minor: Racism, Sexual content, Colonisation, and Dysphoria
sometimes_samantha_reads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Torture, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Grief, War, and Injury/Injury detail
darkefyres's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Torture, Violence, Blood, Grief, Fire/Fire injury, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Cursing, Sexual content, Vomit, and War
Minor: Medical content
mar's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Body horror, Confinement, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Grief, Medical trauma, War, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Sexual content, Torture, and Vomit
Minor: Body shaming, Child death, Pregnancy, and Fire/Fire injury
kateemily's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Moderate: Torture
Minor: Death
whatswithrandy's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Moderate: Body horror, Violence, and War
Minor: Confinement, Sexual content, Torture, and Forced institutionalization
kfergey's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Moderate: Death, Gore, Violence, Xenophobia, Grief, and War
Minor: Infertility, Mental illness, Sexual content, and Torture