Reviews with content warning for Sexual violence - The Right to Sex: Feminism in the Twenty-First Century

I picked up this book after reading the titular essay (after reading "The Aptness of Anger" in a class), and I'm so glad I did! I absolutely love how Srinivasan writes -- she's engaging and accessible, asks a lot of questions, and doesn't always end up with a concrete stance at the end. The book left me with a lot to think about and imagine on my own, and I'm looking forward to reading it again in a couple years when I might know a little more about the topics in it.

Content Warnings

sedgewren's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny informative inspiring reflective slow-paced

5.0

A formidable collection of essays that explore and critique the current state of gender relations without shying away from the nuances and contradictions within the modern feminist movement.

These essays were perfect for me: they were intellectual without being inaccessible; witty without skipping the nuance; contemporary and relevant but grounded in intersectional feminist history. Amia Srinivasan is a fantastic writer and thinker, and I'm glad she is getting the recognition she deserves!

My favourite part of the book was how lightly she treads in her essay The Right to Sex, then how ruthless she is in Coda: The Politics of Desire where she cuts down others' inconsistent/misrepresentative critiques of her essay. She spits absolute fire throughout!

Some critiques I have of her essays (I'll write them down here because this is the easiest way I have of accessing them!)

Although it's slightly out of the scope of the book, I wish she would explore in more detail the suggested remedies to the issues at hand, e.g. using sexual imagination to combat the negative effects of pornography; how we can know when our desire is "choosing for itself" and not "what politics has chosen for us"; how we can give power to the most powerless of women.

Another specific critique I have of Srinivasan's juxtaposition of sex work with slavery (she uses them to say that abolishing slavery as an institution will stop slavery, but abolishing sex work in the law will not stop it) is that slavery actually still happens, and you could potentially argue that their conditions are worse than if it were institutionalised. I still agree with Srinivasan's leaning towards making conditions better for sex workers by decriminalising it, but I don't think those two institutions are as different as she makes them seem.

Content Warnings

lit_with_lauren's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective slow-paced

4.0

Content Warnings

dalmavatai's review

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative inspiring reflective medium-paced

Very well-written, thought-provoking, wise, and incredibly brave. This book is asking difficult questions and giving honest and nuanced answers. A must read for feminists.

Content Warnings

youngsupernovas's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective medium-paced

4.5

Content Warnings

More...