Reviews

The Complete Book of Five Rings by Miyamoto Musashi

camnona's review

Go to review page

4.0

Maybe it was wrong to try to apply Musashi’s thoughts on general life. He was talking more specifically about the martial arts after all. Once I tried to relate it to boxing the book became more enjoyable.

ryanlindbergo's review

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

4.0

ashultz's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

All the Book of Five Rings translations get lumped together but are not at all equal, this is five stars specifically for Kenji Tokitsu's translation. Many others are one-star translations.

This is the only translation of this book I've ever read that understands that Musashi was writing a martial arts manual, not a book of generally applicable philosophy. Most translations of Five Rings try to turn it into a mystic festival of woo woo feelings. That's not what it is, the philosophy that is in here is an outgrowth of his cultural background and attempts to put his style of martial arts into words.

If you're looking for Musashi the martial artist, this is your edition.

8797999's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

An interesting book and read, one I think it would take several reads to full appreciate. Very quotable and I am happy to have now read this book to go along with The Art of War and Tao Te Ching.

If I were to rank them by which I got most out of and enjoyment it would be:

1. The Art of War
2. The Complete Book of Five Rings
3. Tao Te Ching

kimball_hansen's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This book had the longest intro ever. It's a third of the book. It kinda reminds me of the [b:The Art of War|10534|The Art of War|Sun Tzu|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1453417993i/10534._SY75_.jpg|3200649]. But what was more practical for fighting style with swords and spears. The writing style could have been better and more interesting, though.

Oh, and I hate Scott Brick. He's a terrible narrator. Fortunately this was short so I didn't have to suffer a whole lot.

pizzamcpin3ppl3's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging informative inspiring mysterious reflective relaxing fast-paced

4.75

sadia_siddiqua's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

1.0

brucy's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative fast-paced

4.0

chemistry_goodness's review

Go to review page

5.0

My rating isn't one about the original work but my perception of the author's work in translating it. It's a very extensive one with copious notes about background and reasons for the translation choices.

dzengota's review

Go to review page

3.0

The first two section of the Book of Five Rings are what I think most people are there for when they go to this text. That is where some truly interesting philosophy of the sword is placed in a smooth curtness of someone who has made killing a precise art. The later books, and even the translator makes this note, are extremely precise details about individual techniques. Thats pretty interesting at first, reading about following up on certain reactions with a quarter turn of the blade this way or that way, but as it progresses it gets harder to maintain interest in reading without application.

I really respect the flex of, at the end of section of writing, saying: You should dwell on this, or Practice this as I have instructed.