emmareeser's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

3.5 stars

skullfullofbooks's review

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

3.0

My main issue with this book is that the title seems misleading, and the author claims that this is putting science on trial, when really it isn't. This is a case of one man who used to be a whaler getting a job of inspecting fish oil. Instead of doing his job normally, he gets a little power hungry and annoys formal rivals by claiming whale oil is fish oil. And after some back and forth situations the whalers get together and file a suit, because he's hurting their profits.

It's really just a case about a poorly defined law (specifying fish oil but apparently not defining it) and a man using that to his advantage. The attorneys really turned it into a spectacle of trying to prove that scientifically a whale isn't a fish, but that was more of a red herring than anything.

It was an okay read. I would have liked it to be a little bit tighter in the scope. For instance, we had to learn about one single witness, his history in the tanning industry, and why he was mad as he testified. I don't really care, you could tell me in a sentence that he was notable in the tanning industry and I'd be happy. But I am sure more scholarly readers would argue that they needed to show their research, which they did.

So a well researched book with a slightly disappointing delivery for me. Still worth the read if you want to know what people in the general populace thought about whales, tons of information on that. It just doesn't really have a lot to do with the actual trial, it is more the way media handled it during and afterwards.
More...