Scan barcode
saxifrage_seldon's review against another edition
5.0
I just completed Peter Berger’s 1963 book, Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective, and I have to say it was as personal and emotional as it was intellectual. Berger not only makes a compelling argument as to why sociology, as an academic discipline, should be viewed through a humanistic lens; he also underscores its importance in truly understanding the human condition. However, it wasn’t just the argument that compelled me; it was the emotional reaction I had and how it related to my teachers and mentors who introduced me to sociology, as well as the recent attacks on sociology, most notably from the Florida government.
Before delving deeper into the reasons for my emotional response, I want to explore what this book was about, at least to the best of my understanding. Like C. Wright Mills’s book, The Sociological Imagination, published four years prior, Berger seeks to redefine what is meant by sociology. It should be understood that at this time, American sociology was structured in the realm of empirical methodologists and technicians like Talcott Parsons and Paul Lazarsfeld. Instead, both authors attempt to rescue the discipline from the lifeless, ahistorical clutches of grand theory and abstract empiricism, and bring it within the human realm. While Mills’s “sociological imagination” rests on the intersection between the life of the individual human and their problems with larger historical social structures and processes, Berger’s “sociological perspective” rests on the classical, yet somewhat contradictory, dialectical postulate that while individuals make society, societies also make individuals. In other words, as Berger attempts to clarify throughout his book, society is a deterministic prison, but it is a prison that can be transformed, as humans can choose. To make this even more complex, Berger doesn’t center the individual as a singular entity but as a much larger networked complex of roles, each of which brings together a whole host of constraints, possibilities, motivations, and values.
The most interesting part of the book, however, happens when Berger embeds sociologists themselves into this complex, while asking about how they see themselves in contemporary society. Throughout this chapter, he notes, many see sociologists and sociology itself through several prisms, such as a pathway to a practical occupation like a social worker, or a means to social reform, as a methodological pursuit like statistics, or the more devious pursuit of social engineering. Sociologists also see themselves as scientists who are in a constant attempt to justify their pursuits and craft alongside the natural scientists. However, by the end of this chapter, he poses a new definition. Sociologists are those who attempt to understand society in a disciplined and scientific way, but there are individuals whose “consuming interest remains in the world of men, their institutions, their passions” (29). This interest is driven not so much by profit or prestige but by curiosity. Berger ends that chapter by noting “the sociological perspective is more like a demon that possesses one, that drives compellingly, again and again, to the questions that are its own” (36).
What is surprising, and extremely refreshing about Berger’s book, isn’t so much the repositioning of sociology in the context of human affairs, or even intellectual pursuits, but in how, by the end of the book, he positions sociology as a humanistic endeavor. This calls for sociological studies to break down the constraints that attempt to pigeonhole it into specific methodological and theoretical concerns, as well as attacks the nature of academe itself, which he contends is less a pursuit of knowledge than attempts at surviving the “rat race of the university” and its focus on publishing in the “right places” and attempting “to meet those people who dwell close to the mainsprings of academic patronage” (194). He closes the book though with seeing the sociologist as a “transmitter of knowledge,” which is someone in his moment, as well as our own, as someone to teach “students who come to college because they need a degree to be hired by the corporation of their choice or because that is what is expected of them in a certain social position” (197). While Berger acknowledges the utility of this venture, he notes that it is a problem that also goes against the primary ethos of sociology, which is to debunk and disenchant the social world. To Berger, this problem must be approached differently when teaching different levels of students; however, in essence, it is a problem not of teaching skills to gain credits, but instead, it is more of an enlightening process that entails risk and suffering but is also the foundation of freedom and awareness.
It is this pedagogical mission that evoked the response I had. It pushed me to reflect on my own education and how lucky I was to have the mentors I did throughout my academic career who constantly pushed me to question reality and to dig deeper to analyze and assess the larger historical structures and processes shaping that “reality.” It pushed me to more fully comprehend my opposition to Florida’s government's efforts to remove sociology as a core course, thus using its power to engage in “cancel culture” at its highest, most pertinent level. Above all else, Berger’s book allowed me to gain a greater understanding of my first mentor in sociology, Thomas Lambert. Lambert was one of Berger’s students when he studied sociology at the New School, and in reading this book, I saw the influence Berger had on him. Looking back on Lambert’s lectures, I saw everything in Berger’s book there, whether it was the centrality of social institutions as both a prison and protector from the existential dread of an uncaring universe, the networked multiplicity of roles one plays in a highly stratified world, and the constant strategic decisions that an individual must make to stay afloat. Moreover, I saw Lambert’s larger message that the sociological perspective is something that will not bring you money or get you status, but instead, set you on a passionate pursuit to uncover social realities that bring with it a contradictory similitude of awareness and ignorance, satisfaction and suffering, and despair and hope. It is a message that not only has helped me readjust the perspective of my own life but it is one that I hope to convey to my students.
Before delving deeper into the reasons for my emotional response, I want to explore what this book was about, at least to the best of my understanding. Like C. Wright Mills’s book, The Sociological Imagination, published four years prior, Berger seeks to redefine what is meant by sociology. It should be understood that at this time, American sociology was structured in the realm of empirical methodologists and technicians like Talcott Parsons and Paul Lazarsfeld. Instead, both authors attempt to rescue the discipline from the lifeless, ahistorical clutches of grand theory and abstract empiricism, and bring it within the human realm. While Mills’s “sociological imagination” rests on the intersection between the life of the individual human and their problems with larger historical social structures and processes, Berger’s “sociological perspective” rests on the classical, yet somewhat contradictory, dialectical postulate that while individuals make society, societies also make individuals. In other words, as Berger attempts to clarify throughout his book, society is a deterministic prison, but it is a prison that can be transformed, as humans can choose. To make this even more complex, Berger doesn’t center the individual as a singular entity but as a much larger networked complex of roles, each of which brings together a whole host of constraints, possibilities, motivations, and values.
The most interesting part of the book, however, happens when Berger embeds sociologists themselves into this complex, while asking about how they see themselves in contemporary society. Throughout this chapter, he notes, many see sociologists and sociology itself through several prisms, such as a pathway to a practical occupation like a social worker, or a means to social reform, as a methodological pursuit like statistics, or the more devious pursuit of social engineering. Sociologists also see themselves as scientists who are in a constant attempt to justify their pursuits and craft alongside the natural scientists. However, by the end of this chapter, he poses a new definition. Sociologists are those who attempt to understand society in a disciplined and scientific way, but there are individuals whose “consuming interest remains in the world of men, their institutions, their passions” (29). This interest is driven not so much by profit or prestige but by curiosity. Berger ends that chapter by noting “the sociological perspective is more like a demon that possesses one, that drives compellingly, again and again, to the questions that are its own” (36).
What is surprising, and extremely refreshing about Berger’s book, isn’t so much the repositioning of sociology in the context of human affairs, or even intellectual pursuits, but in how, by the end of the book, he positions sociology as a humanistic endeavor. This calls for sociological studies to break down the constraints that attempt to pigeonhole it into specific methodological and theoretical concerns, as well as attacks the nature of academe itself, which he contends is less a pursuit of knowledge than attempts at surviving the “rat race of the university” and its focus on publishing in the “right places” and attempting “to meet those people who dwell close to the mainsprings of academic patronage” (194). He closes the book though with seeing the sociologist as a “transmitter of knowledge,” which is someone in his moment, as well as our own, as someone to teach “students who come to college because they need a degree to be hired by the corporation of their choice or because that is what is expected of them in a certain social position” (197). While Berger acknowledges the utility of this venture, he notes that it is a problem that also goes against the primary ethos of sociology, which is to debunk and disenchant the social world. To Berger, this problem must be approached differently when teaching different levels of students; however, in essence, it is a problem not of teaching skills to gain credits, but instead, it is more of an enlightening process that entails risk and suffering but is also the foundation of freedom and awareness.
It is this pedagogical mission that evoked the response I had. It pushed me to reflect on my own education and how lucky I was to have the mentors I did throughout my academic career who constantly pushed me to question reality and to dig deeper to analyze and assess the larger historical structures and processes shaping that “reality.” It pushed me to more fully comprehend my opposition to Florida’s government's efforts to remove sociology as a core course, thus using its power to engage in “cancel culture” at its highest, most pertinent level. Above all else, Berger’s book allowed me to gain a greater understanding of my first mentor in sociology, Thomas Lambert. Lambert was one of Berger’s students when he studied sociology at the New School, and in reading this book, I saw the influence Berger had on him. Looking back on Lambert’s lectures, I saw everything in Berger’s book there, whether it was the centrality of social institutions as both a prison and protector from the existential dread of an uncaring universe, the networked multiplicity of roles one plays in a highly stratified world, and the constant strategic decisions that an individual must make to stay afloat. Moreover, I saw Lambert’s larger message that the sociological perspective is something that will not bring you money or get you status, but instead, set you on a passionate pursuit to uncover social realities that bring with it a contradictory similitude of awareness and ignorance, satisfaction and suffering, and despair and hope. It is a message that not only has helped me readjust the perspective of my own life but it is one that I hope to convey to my students.
ddeydub's review against another edition
challenging
reflective
medium-paced
5.0
Broke my mind for a few days. Informative and interesting.
mimosaeyes's review against another edition
informative
lighthearted
medium-paced
4.0
I'm supposed to begin a masters in sociology later this year, and my colleague lent me this book saying it would make a good start. I'd have to agree - it covers a number of major thinkers, and contains the author's insights into the state and history of the field. I enjoyed the tone of wry humour that he adopts, but also, sometimes the writing is downright powerful. Lucid and persuasive.
dashtaisen's review against another edition
informative
lighthearted
medium-paced
3.0
I picked up "Invitation to Sociology" because I was interested in sociology and especially how it applies to tech and education. And it looks like sociology has some interesting insights to offer! This book specifically, on the other hand, was kinda meh.
There were some things I liked about it. Prof. Berger at least tried to write in an accessible and sometimes humorous way, and mostly succeeds. He offers a way of viewing social behavior with a balance of compassion, curiosity, and skepticism.
My favorite part of the book is when he talks about how sociology is trying to be taken seriously as a science, which leads some practitioners to take on a narrowly positivist approach which does not really serve anyone in the end, and which comes at the expense of developing a foundation in related fields such as history and philosophy. This was written in the early 1960s, and I don't know much about how the field has progressed since then. But it definitely made me think of the "data-driven" obsession that we often see in schools and tech companies now.
The author makes an earnest effort at showing how sociology relates to ethics and social justice, and spends quite a lot of time advocating for views which were probably pretty progressive in his specific circles. That said, the overall tone of the book is pretty gratingly chauvinistic in every sense of the word, even by the standards of the time (and I'm honestly less inclined to give social scientists a pass in that regard anyway).
So I got some useful stuff out of reading this, and there's also some stuff I'm happy to leave behind.
There were some things I liked about it. Prof. Berger at least tried to write in an accessible and sometimes humorous way, and mostly succeeds. He offers a way of viewing social behavior with a balance of compassion, curiosity, and skepticism.
My favorite part of the book is when he talks about how sociology is trying to be taken seriously as a science, which leads some practitioners to take on a narrowly positivist approach which does not really serve anyone in the end, and which comes at the expense of developing a foundation in related fields such as history and philosophy. This was written in the early 1960s, and I don't know much about how the field has progressed since then. But it definitely made me think of the "data-driven" obsession that we often see in schools and tech companies now.
The author makes an earnest effort at showing how sociology relates to ethics and social justice, and spends quite a lot of time advocating for views which were probably pretty progressive in his specific circles. That said, the overall tone of the book is pretty gratingly chauvinistic in every sense of the word, even by the standards of the time (and I'm honestly less inclined to give social scientists a pass in that regard anyway).
So I got some useful stuff out of reading this, and there's also some stuff I'm happy to leave behind.
n3tti3's review
já asi nějak nechápu, jak a procm tohle někteří považují za nejlepší knihu a úvod o a do sociologie…
autor neustále opakuje, jak je sociologie nezaujatá a nehodnotící věda, přitom je to samá misogynie, rasismus, xenofobie a homofobie…
autor neustále opakuje, jak je sociologie nezaujatá a nehodnotící věda, přitom je to samá misogynie, rasismus, xenofobie a homofobie…
1989ruth's review against another edition
slow-paced
4.5
xulissim !!!!!!
noies aquest és genuinament el llibre que no sabia que necessitava !! mai hagués pensat que una lectura obligatòria m'agradaria tant. un dia més estant PER FI a la carrera correcta <3