isaacrubberducky's review
5.0
This might be my new favorite book. The pitch on the back of book is just an excuse for Lem to philosophize about the nature of academic research, where it comes from, and why it happens. If you typically enjoy Lem, or philosophers that spend a lot of time taking shots at bureaucrats, you'll enjoy this book. It is both exciting and satisfying, and I will be recommending it to nearly everyone.
orange_eating_class's review
5.0
"With sufficient imagination a man could write a whole series of versions of his life; it would form a union of sets in which the facts would be the only elements in common."
The idea of the individual as a microcosm of society or even the universe as a whole is a very old one. It is an idea that Stanislaw Lem regularly explored in his fiction, insofar as his writing exhibits a fairly radical Socratic ignorance concerning our ability to understand the nature of the self (as seen in the above quote from the preface to this book), alien intellects, and nature. His Master's Voice is probably the ultimate expression of Lem's skepticism. The novel is about Cold War-era scientists attempting to make sense of what appears to indisputably be an interstellar message from alien beings. Numerous plausible interpretations of the message and the senders' intent are put forward, most of them plausible, but none even remotely definitive. Indeed, the only thing that would appear to be certain is an utter disregard or at best despairing acceptance by these scientists of the use to which the knowledge derived from the message might be put. With the United States and USSR already locked in a standoff with the nuclear weapons developed using 20th Century science's previous revolutions, the greatest priority in decoding the alien senders' message is in its military applications. It's depressing, but also more realistic than the vast majority of science fiction which treats the misuse of science as an aberration of a morally pure (or at least morally neutral) pursuit, rather than as an enterprise which has historically been centered on aiding the powerful in their conquests. His Master's Voice is, additionally, a deeply philosophical book, but also a more nakedly human novel than any of the other works I've read by Lem, and as such, it probably deserves to stand as his masterpiece even above the likes of Solaris. It has become an instant favorite of mine, and I suspect I will repeatedly return to it in the future.
The idea of the individual as a microcosm of society or even the universe as a whole is a very old one. It is an idea that Stanislaw Lem regularly explored in his fiction, insofar as his writing exhibits a fairly radical Socratic ignorance concerning our ability to understand the nature of the self (as seen in the above quote from the preface to this book), alien intellects, and nature. His Master's Voice is probably the ultimate expression of Lem's skepticism. The novel is about Cold War-era scientists attempting to make sense of what appears to indisputably be an interstellar message from alien beings. Numerous plausible interpretations of the message and the senders' intent are put forward, most of them plausible, but none even remotely definitive. Indeed, the only thing that would appear to be certain is an utter disregard or at best despairing acceptance by these scientists of the use to which the knowledge derived from the message might be put. With the United States and USSR already locked in a standoff with the nuclear weapons developed using 20th Century science's previous revolutions, the greatest priority in decoding the alien senders' message is in its military applications. It's depressing, but also more realistic than the vast majority of science fiction which treats the misuse of science as an aberration of a morally pure (or at least morally neutral) pursuit, rather than as an enterprise which has historically been centered on aiding the powerful in their conquests. His Master's Voice is, additionally, a deeply philosophical book, but also a more nakedly human novel than any of the other works I've read by Lem, and as such, it probably deserves to stand as his masterpiece even above the likes of Solaris. It has become an instant favorite of mine, and I suspect I will repeatedly return to it in the future.
mortifiedpenguin92's review
informative
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
docfaustus's review
2.0
I feel bad giving this two stars -- famous author's famous book, recently reissued! But I just don't get it. The back of the book assures me that it's a satire of the cold war arms race and maybe it's so, but I didn't get it and found it a slog to get through.
david_agranoff's review
3.0
This book had been on my shelf for years, and I knew I wanted to read it at some point. It is considered a classic and certainly Lem's Solaris is one of the best mind screwing sci-fi novels ever written. Lem pretty much broke the forth wall spoke directly to us on page 31: "The Reader who plowed his[their] way to this point and is waiting , with growing impatience, to be lead into a inner sanctum of the famous enigma, in the hope that I will regale him [them]with thrills and chills every bit as delightful as he experiences viewing horror movies, I advise to set my book down now."
Yeah I admit during the first 30 pages I found myself wonder what the hell was the story. If anything this warning was about 30 pages late. Alot of the early pages just came off as philosophical nonsense. I am sure that is on me but I was waiting for a story to begin. Once I got this warning I sat back to enjoy the book for what it was a thin story propping a discussion of how our species would/could handle contact with a intelligent species beyond our world.
So the story centers around a signal discovered to be repeating that is coming from deep space somewhere around Canis Minor. The signal is transmitted by a method that itself is barely understood. So the U.S. Government gathers physicists,
linguists, engineers, psychoanalysts, mathematicians, chemists, humanists, anthropologists and many others. We are told 25,000 experts and sub-experts are gathered in the Nevada dessert to study it. Years go by they learn enough to bio-engineer something they call frog-eggs something they don't entirely understand.
The title of the book does a excellent job of expressing the whole point of the 199 page exercise. The title is reference to the record famously played for dog to test him if he would response to a recorded voice. It confused the dog, and that is what happens to humans here. Confusion. I actually wish Lem had kept the the title but not named the Manhatten style project in the book His Master's voice. I doubt the government would name their project that. Maybe the scientists would have but whatever, I think it took away from the power of the title.
This novel is a masterpiece of speculative philosophy, that is held together by a threadbare story. The story is not the point. Thinking about what it means to contact another civilization is the point. The extra-terrestrials here are not typical not war like or peaceful. They are as much a mystery as the nightsky itself. We are not even sure if the senders intended for earth to get the message or was it a accident. The message could have been sent out billions of years ago and the senders may be alive or not.
This may be a spoiler but the novel in the end is not about communication, but lack of communication. It becomes most clear when our lead scientists has to explain to us dummies through a dummy surrogate in the Senate. This dialogue clears up alot of things that frankly flew over my head.
There is plenty of ghee-whiz moments when the team discovers that instead of numbers and math the methods normally considered to be the common language in translation, the language is genetic, and based on chemicals. Lem writes some of the most genius and other worldly science fiction.
It might seem funny to say this is a masterpiece of science fiction and certainly worth of five stars even when I personally gave it three. Lot it is a work of genius and the ideas it brings up and discussion are important. I think it is an important book but it is not exactly a fun read. The opening 25 pages is a not stop pompus blab fest that adds zero to the book. In thinking about this book I would talk myself into it's genius at times and then marvel at how crap other parts were.
I also think it is a interesting counter to Sagan's Contact. I wonder if Carl had this book in his mind when he came up with that one. I can't recommend this as a fun read. But certainly I think the ideas are important, if a dry as sand paper sci-fif novel is something you can live with read it and lets talk.
Yeah I admit during the first 30 pages I found myself wonder what the hell was the story. If anything this warning was about 30 pages late. Alot of the early pages just came off as philosophical nonsense. I am sure that is on me but I was waiting for a story to begin. Once I got this warning I sat back to enjoy the book for what it was a thin story propping a discussion of how our species would/could handle contact with a intelligent species beyond our world.
So the story centers around a signal discovered to be repeating that is coming from deep space somewhere around Canis Minor. The signal is transmitted by a method that itself is barely understood. So the U.S. Government gathers physicists,
linguists, engineers, psychoanalysts, mathematicians, chemists, humanists, anthropologists and many others. We are told 25,000 experts and sub-experts are gathered in the Nevada dessert to study it. Years go by they learn enough to bio-engineer something they call frog-eggs something they don't entirely understand.
The title of the book does a excellent job of expressing the whole point of the 199 page exercise. The title is reference to the record famously played for dog to test him if he would response to a recorded voice. It confused the dog, and that is what happens to humans here. Confusion. I actually wish Lem had kept the the title but not named the Manhatten style project in the book His Master's voice. I doubt the government would name their project that. Maybe the scientists would have but whatever, I think it took away from the power of the title.
This novel is a masterpiece of speculative philosophy, that is held together by a threadbare story. The story is not the point. Thinking about what it means to contact another civilization is the point. The extra-terrestrials here are not typical not war like or peaceful. They are as much a mystery as the nightsky itself. We are not even sure if the senders intended for earth to get the message or was it a accident. The message could have been sent out billions of years ago and the senders may be alive or not.
This may be a spoiler but the novel in the end is not about communication, but lack of communication. It becomes most clear when our lead scientists has to explain to us dummies through a dummy surrogate in the Senate. This dialogue clears up alot of things that frankly flew over my head.
There is plenty of ghee-whiz moments when the team discovers that instead of numbers and math the methods normally considered to be the common language in translation, the language is genetic, and based on chemicals. Lem writes some of the most genius and other worldly science fiction.
It might seem funny to say this is a masterpiece of science fiction and certainly worth of five stars even when I personally gave it three. Lot it is a work of genius and the ideas it brings up and discussion are important. I think it is an important book but it is not exactly a fun read. The opening 25 pages is a not stop pompus blab fest that adds zero to the book. In thinking about this book I would talk myself into it's genius at times and then marvel at how crap other parts were.
I also think it is a interesting counter to Sagan's Contact. I wonder if Carl had this book in his mind when he came up with that one. I can't recommend this as a fun read. But certainly I think the ideas are important, if a dry as sand paper sci-fif novel is something you can live with read it and lets talk.
ruaidhri_'s review against another edition
challenging
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
It's a high 3. I love Lem's books with my whole heart for his world building. This book concept was great, and was nicely executed. Sadly I felt like half of the book was filler. The prologue was such a nonsense. The book instead of focusing on deciphering the code, focused on random things that didn't connect to the plot (and I'm a person who likes heavy world building in books). The main character was a old white male who was a professor version of "I'm not like other girls" ("I'm not like other professors, I'm better). He was "misunderstood", smarter then everybody. I hated him with every cell of my body. And not in a good way, Ihated him in a "I wanna throw this book across the room" way.
bundy23's review
2.0
A not-even-remotely-humble narrator spends hours and hours and hours telling us -
a) How he's the greatest mathematician on the earth
b) How he's the greatest philosopher on the earth
c) Why everyone else is wrong and he is right
I found it pretty boring.
a) How he's the greatest mathematician on the earth
b) How he's the greatest philosopher on the earth
c) Why everyone else is wrong and he is right
I found it pretty boring.