colorfulleo92's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I don't read nearly enough feminist non fiction that I would like to do but I'm slowly and surely on my way. I picked it up in one of the more neglected book shelf sections for me in the library and I'm eager to adventure on more. This was such good essays and while I don't enjoy short stories a lot. I think essays is more my thing? Was afraid I would have same outcome. She writes very well and has a lot of interesting and good things to say and I'm intrigued to see if I can find more by her

xanthea's review against another edition

Go to review page

Anyone who is even midly inderested in gender and feminism needs to read this book.

emmath's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Utvalda delar.

septan's review

Go to review page

5.0

This book made me want to scream and cheer at the same time. It's so refreshingly angry and (mostly) just so RIGHT. Would give it more than five stars if I could.

eososray's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

To start, I skipped over all the essay's about Trump. I know, I've heard, new articles are being written everyday.

For the rest, these very much come across as articles written as 'click bait'. They are short, emotional and on controversial or dramatic subjects.

So, all 20 something girls should be single. I think this is strange. We don't tell men this. We don't think that they will be less independent or that they will be making wrong decisions. I think that this statement of staying single means something else. I think has nothing to do with the actual singleness, I think it has to do with independence and how we view this as imperative to do on your own. I don't agree.

Also, this vision that so many writers have of a world where the roles were reversed. Like, if men were the ones who got pregnant. Why do we always think this would be better, that the things we want as women would automatically exist just because men are experiencing these things. Maybe it would be worse, maybe it would be exactly the same. Automatically thinking that it would be better, is something we should stop. Because it's probably not true.

I think Emma Watson, Beyonce and Mad Max need to be dropped as feminist subjects. These are tired discussions, endlessly written about. First, these women should be left to live their lives however they want. Second, it's a movie, not a feminist icon.

And lastly, I actually am insulted that she considers Jane Austen to have written 'horror' stories about women with no other choice but to catch a man.
These books are satires on life in those times and in that era, no doubt. But to classify them as horror stories about women trapped does them a great disservice.

adrianlarose's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A clear vision for what's wrong and what's needed. Published / edited shortly after the 2016 US election, it's interesting, if depressing to see how pointed many of the - well, points, made in these essays are today. Laurie Penny writes clearly and piercingly about our problems.

jkteut's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

I gave it the good old college try in finishing this book. Tbh, I couldn't finish it. Too white feminism, too cishet, too I am everywoman.

julianebien's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative inspiring medium-paced

4.5

whatulysses's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I don't think I was the audience.

janedoelish's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Smart, compelling, opinionated:

I really appreciate Laurie Penny's essays. The only reason why I withheld the final star was because I was already familiar with most of the material in this anthology; virtually all of these essays were available before, and I would have hoped for more previously unpublished essays.

Still, Penny's writing is as important as ever.