sergioruizperez's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Si no recuerdo mal, creo que es la primera obra de Vargas Llosa que leo. Muy interesante. Al principio me descolocó un poco que metiera relatos cortos entre la historia principal, pero los enlaza de manera sublime.
Hay muchas cosas que se me han quedado grabadas de estea novela y en las que sigo pensando unos días después de haber terminado de leerlas. Me gustaría mucho saber qué parte es realmente autobiográfica y también el tema de que los 50 sean la mejor edad de una persona, ahora que me voy acercando a ellos.
He "descubierto" un autor con el que tenía algunos prejuicios y ciertamente lo leeré más en el futuro.

styllebad's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

3.0

junghung's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Not a fan of how this wraps up, but still, it's my first great read of 2024. What a romp!

signeherta's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.5

katedid73's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I found it too descriptive and wordy. I am hoping something was lost in translation. It was a very slow difficult read.

boromirfaramir's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

It's an ambitious book and the structure of the book itself makes the storytelling all the more interesting. The book's main narrative — that of Mario and his Aunt's sister Julia's love affair is interspersed with chapters of Pedro Camacho, a radio serial scriptwriter's stories.

The book is a comic masterpiece, and the Pedro's scripts change as he changes too. The farcical nature of the novel and the storytelling lend it a postmodern touch. Having never been in the radio era, Llosa's narration of how households came to a standstill when radio serials aired was beautifully depicted. In fact, all the 'episodes' as written by Pedro are masterful.

jasminesummer's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

sidharthvardhan's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

If you are an Indian, you probably know how terrible are the Indian daily soaps. And being forced at times to suffer my senses with them, I have at times wondered about their scriptwriters. What kind of brains and lives they would have? To be able to conceive something so consciously. I know actors of daily soaps work an awful lot and, given that scriptwriters don't make as much - they are probably working on multiple soaps. Now if like me, you believe that the quantity and quality of works produced by a particular writer are often directly proportional, you will agree that it only makes sense that most daily soaps are kitsch. No one can produce several hours worth of original art every week.


The scriptwriter in here does that and produces good results (by low standards of daily soaps) and so it is only a matter of time before he goes mad. Llosa adds a forgettable love story to the same and this main story alternates with bad short stories that seem to be inspired from daily soaps.

jcc23's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

2.5 estrellas.

La historia de Varguitas, un joven de 18 años que se enamora de su tía Julia, se entremezcla con la de Pedro Camacho, un escribiente de novelas radiofónicas. A su vez, en capítulos pares, se narran algunas historias del escribiente. El estilo es relajado y con tintes de humor, aunque las historias del escribiente son más bien dramáticas y tendientes a lo bizarro, tienen un lenguaje más formal y en su mayoría finalizan con cliff-hangers.

Camacho es ese trabajador que ama su profesión al punto que no puede trazar límites entre su vida personal y laboral, y de esa debilidad se vale su empleador para sacarle provecho. Esta situación provoca un deterioro mental que se refleja tanto en el personaje-Camacho como en el narrador-Camacho, quien con cada nueva historia va perdiendo el hilo de sus personajes y sus tramas se vuelven cada vez más caóticas.

Lo que más destaco es la construcción de los personajes, sus interacciones entre sí y cómo se narran las hostilidades del mundo en el que habitan y se ganan la vida. Como punto negativo: me ha parecido una novela innecesariamente larga, donde muchas de las historias de Camacho sobran o no aportan a la trama general. Si bien este es un Vargas Llosa lúcido, en mi opinión no llega a estar a la altura de sus anteriores novelas, todas ellas clásicos, como La ciudad y los perros, Conversación en la Catedral y La casa verde.

smusie's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Enormously clever and funny, it became something of a chore to finish, due to the alternating structure of the main story with the radio serial scripts written by the slowly decompensating scriptwriter. The experience detracted from the heart of the story, and by the end even the main story had become cold. Cheap finish. I saw it's on a magical realism list--not so.