Reviews tagging 'Sexual violence'

Une braise sous la cendre by Sabaa Tahir

158 reviews

notapenguin's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

roseandivy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.0

okay so. i really wanted to love this book. i really did. i'd heard so many good things about it from so many people that i was sure coming in that this would be a 3.5 or higher. unfortunately, there were a myriad of things that i absolutely couldn't stand.

the first was elias as a character. listen, i like a morally gray mc, i like complicated people, i like characters rebelling against the systems they were raised in, but everything about this man fell so flat for me. he was boring, and the attempts at making him seem complicated were lackluster, and i couldn't buy the fact that despite being raised in blackcliff for the majority of his life, he somehow clung to the values he was taught as a five year old and became the sole mask to want to oppose the empire. he felt stilted and unrealistic, and i couldn't stand the way he talked about both laia and helene. his constant objectification of the both of them (especially when laia was enslaved) grossed me out so much,
as well as his insistence upon "protecting" helene from marcus by having his classmates follow her, and acting like he knew better than her when she told him to stop
. he's posited as the "good" man, but i feel like he still falls into the same misogyny as all the other male characters, just in less violent way, which would make sense if we had an arc of him unlearning the misogyny he's been taught, but his actions aren't ever really recognized as wrong or something he needs to change, just part of his "protective: and "dominant" character.

which leads me into the handling of misogyny and rape in this book. it feels like rape is used as a plot device or for shock value so much. every other chapter one of the female characters is being threatened with rape, or is scared of being raped, or a male character is joking about rape. as a survivor i think having depictions of and discussions of rape culture in books is important, but this felt less like a genuine attempt to engage with the weight of rape as an atrocity and more like the author was just using it as a tool to demonstrate that certain people were villains, and the fact that this is a young adult novel just makes it more uncomfortable. i certainly could've done with mature and meaningful discussions of rape in books as a child and teen, given that that aligned with my experience, but i've seen this book recommended as for ages 12+, and i think reading this book that young would've been more damaging than helpful for me.

there are a lot of other things in this book i could critique-- the one-dimensional villains, the fact that i found laia so boring, the lack of care given to the inclusion of magical elements (so many things just come out of absolutely nowhere with no warning or explanation seemingly just because it's convenient, especially
helene's magical singing
)-- but the one thing i did like was helene herself. i've seen mixed opinions on her amongst various people who've read this book, but i actually found her far more nuanced and interesting than i ever found elias or laia, given her unique position within blackcliff as the only female mask. if the two main characters had been helene and laia (with or without the romance component) i would've been much more excited to see their interactions and watch the two of their stories intertwine, as well as the arc helene would've gotten.

unfortunately, my love for helene only made the end of this book even more disappointing.
i cannot stand how illogical and ridiculous elias' decision during the final trial was-- if he's motivated by a desire to minimize the damage the empire does, wouldn't it make more sense to ensure that he or helene won, therefore giving him a chance to enact change? wouldn't letting helene kill laia and then going on to save the rest of the scholars from further brutality and oppression be more in line with his goals? why does he condemn his lifelong best friend to servitude to a man who's threatened to rape her multiple times in order to save a girl he's known for a fraction of that time? wouldn't letting marcus become emperor and continue to slaughter thousands of scholars be doing far more damage than sacrificing one life for the sake of an entire population?
throughout the entire book, helene is presented as an accessory to elias, there to support him rather than to have her own autonomy or wants and goals--
her being in love with him really only hammers this in. and why can we never have a man and a woman be best friends without one of them being in love or wanting to have sex with the other?
i found this so incredibly frustrating, because it felt like such a waste of a character with so much potential.

overall, very disappointed, but it gets one star for helene. i considered reading the next book just to get her pov, and i might still do it, but at the moment it doesn't seem worth my time.

edit: i forgot laia is seventeen and elias is 20. yikes.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

talonsontypewriters's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.0

again the issue might really just be that I'm a hater but there is something wrong if rape threats are making me roll my eyes. bad writing, unclear worldbuilding, flat characters, terrible love square that overwhelms the actual (thin in and of itself) main plot, sexual violence as a constant random unaddressed plot device given nowhere near its appropriate weight.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kdsmoove's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

megmogb's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mj1588's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

amelia_rose_20's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

10/10 | "An Ember in the Ashes" is a standout read that masterfully combines a profound exploration of ethical dilemmas and personal growth with meticulously crafted characters and a plot that is as emotionally engaging as it is action-packed. This book is both provocative and immensely satisfying, making it a must-read for fans of rich, complex narratives.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lrm11's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jeyjeyyy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful mysterious sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

SO GOOD!!! I HAVENT BEEN SO INVESTED IN A SERIES SINCE SIX OF CROWS

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

timelapse's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No

2.0

this book has not figured out what it wants to be. it’s not quite fully dystopian, because both the main characters are solely worried about their individual suffering, and there is very little awareness of the regime in place. there is magic in the book, but for some reason it isn’t essential to the workings of the plot? so the book isn’t really fantasy. and there’s genuinely nothing roman-esque about this (there’s a xenophobic tribal vs empire tension hinted at in the books? and jinns????) besides them having slaves.

my main gripe with the magic being weirdly absent and underdone is honestly mostly that i hate omniscient prophecy figures lol and it feels very cheaply incorporated here, but at least this book doesn’t try to be a super fantasy-forward book.

however, it’s a real crime that the worldbuilding is so toothless, considering that the book really sets itself up to try to be a classic ya dystopia novel. for a book about claiming your own destiny, the characters are extremely self-motivated, and as a dystopian book, it’s very myopic.

despite there being an oppressive martial regime that has created subclasses of humans, the primary threat faced by the main character is… misogyny? and not even particularly interesting or insightful misogyny; the author treats brutality against women as commonplace, but still something that happens to exceptional individuals. tahir clumsily tells you every! other! minute that laia is soooo pretty, and that’s why every man wants to violate her. (besides for this OTHER man who is soo not like the others who also fell for her looks at first sight but again is sooo not like the others)

it makes it really hard to give a fuck about the characters when most of the “love” is male saviorism for this beautiful, exceptional woman, but it’s even harder to try to give a fuck about anything that happens in this world when the author is unable to elaborate on a social structure more complex than women being brutalized. it seemed like “men hate women” was the lowest hanging, most absolute evil that she could write, and in reiterating it so many times so pointlessly, she neglected everything else necessary to writing a compelling novel. 

i think this book could’ve been done better if it was an adult dystopian novel, and not a ya one, to really lean into the violence of the world (that the book does not shy away from) and give it more complex backstories than a stupid love triangle, but i honestly don’t think this author could accomplish writing a more complicated and fleshed out world. i remember distinctly that even at 10% into the book i was really confused by the pacing and how little i was learning about the world despite how many things were being explained, and that really never got better even when i finished the whole book. it’s a pity, because i do think helene's arc will get more interesting in the subsequent books, but i feel like i'd be wasting my time to keep reading in this series

Expand filter menu Content Warnings