Reviews

Cassandra by Christa Wolf

kellynkell's review

Go to review page

challenging dark sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

bronteide's review

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced

4.75

Я не ожидала, что эта книга будет настолько глубокой, настолько красиво написанной. В процессе чтения меня не покидало чувство безысходности. Читать эту книгу было трудно, во-первых из-за обилия имен древнегреческих персонажей и богов, о которых я мало знала, из-за "потока сознания" и отсутствия глав, и во-вторых, из-за тяжести сюжета, обилия насилия. Сложно наблюдать за тем, как демократическое государство превращается в авторитарное, как у женщин отбираются права. Кассандра предстает перед нами не как волшебница-предсказательница, а как один из немногих разумных голосов среди хаоса войны. Цитата, которая больше всего мне запала в душу, вот эта:

- Ты считаешь, Арисба, человек сам себя не ведает, не видит?
- Именно. Ему этого не вынести. Ему нужно изображение кого-то другого.
- И что же, это никогда не изменится? Вечно только повторение одного и того же? Боязнь себя, идолы, ненависть?
- Этого я не знаю. Я одно знаю: во времени бывают провалы. Мы в одном из них, здесь и сейчас. И мы не вправе упустить его без толку".

И конечно, "Героя я любить не смогу. Созерцать твое превращение в собственный памятник - это не по мне". Кассандра часто меняет тех, к кому обращается, и когда она обращается к Энею - случается что-то особенное. "Кроме наших имен мы, пожалуй, других слов и не говорили, и более прекрасного любовного стихотворения я не слыхала в жизни". 

Эта книга про то, как жить во время войны, с которой ты не согласен, но против которой не можешь ничего сделать. Кассандра чувствует себя одинокой очень долгое время, но все-таки потом она находит свое "мы". В конце концов, это книга внушает мне надежду. Не надо откладывать жизнь, даже если вокруг война. Не надо жить "понарошку", пока она не кончится. Хочется быть Анхизом, хочется привлекать к себе своих людей. Хочется не бояться быть собой и говорить то, во что действительно веришь, даже если и свои и чужие могут посчитать тебя сумасшедшей.

ostrava's review

Go to review page

3.0

A dignified effort. I did not like it, however. It was probably the writing…

Individual moments needed to be stronger and as a whole it feels more curious than actually intriguing or charming.

luelizabeth's review

Go to review page

5.0

“Aeneas remained a glowing point inside me; his name a sharp stab that I inflicted on myself as often as I could.”
So incredibly and stunningly written. Lack of chapters made my terrible memory sob but the work in itself flowed smoothly xxxxx

marlimoon's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

criptochecca's review

Go to review page

4.0

Facciamo finta che non abbia impiegato quasi un anno per leggere le prime 40 pagine, una volta superato quel threshold questo libro ti prende per la gola, ho letto tutto il resto in una giornata e credo che poche cose mi abbiano colpita come Achille la Bestia. Sai che è una lettura buona dell'Iliade quando Achille non viene presentato come un qualche softboy il cui più grande peccato è stato uccidere qualcuno perché straziato per la morte dell'amato.

literarymegg's review

Go to review page

informative mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

maunderak's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

malglories's review

Go to review page

5.0

cassandra is the prophetess doomed to always speak the truth but to never be believed. here, cassandra's voice bursts through the pages, vivid, honest, despairing, tender. the story is an immersive, relentless stream of consciousness, the last cry of a voice soon to be extinguished.

i wish i could quote the whole thing. there is so much here about feminism, about power, about complicity. the blessed and destructive power of language - language as power, one of my great interests, is explored so well - especially in regards to the subversion of cassandra's curse and the involvement of troy in the war. christa wolf, as an east german writer, drew parallels from and to east germany uncannily, making the novel all the more interesting, as its politics are double-edged. the descent of troy from a free to an authoritarian state, from an equal to a patriarchal state, is fascinatingly drawn.

all the larger-than-life characters - achilles, hector, paris, agamemnon, clytemnestra, penthesilea - are gloriously, regrettably human. most of all i appreciated cassandra herself, her flaws, her complex loves and hates, and her tenderness.

though sometimes i did think that clarity of story was sacrificed to style, one could read it another way: that cassandra, though a little impenetrable, finally has full control over her voice.

shutupem's review

Go to review page

4.0

This book is basically what I thought Silence of the Girls was going to be before I read it. I really loved the reimagining of the story and the feminine perspective is *chefs kiss*. I liked a lot about the book, especially how it can be an allegory to living under an ideologically oppressive regime (which adds a lot to the historical story as well imo) and the less than literal interpretation of Cassandra's curse.

Howeveeeer I really do not like the modernist stream-of-consciousness style of writing. It's confusing, there's no chapters or page breaks and if you take a little time off reading it's really hard to get back into. I think the style was like "objectively good" and probably effective but subjectively it made the book less enjoyable and I wish it was even a little tiny bit less committed to the style. There are definitely things I missed because I found it very difficult to read at times, and I don't particularly want to go back and read it again to catch them all.