brittneyrz's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced

3.0

dithorba's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced

3.0

I think this book is okay. It certainly is ambitious but there are a number of assessments that make it clear the author has a mostly workable laymen understanding of many historical periods, and uttterly underdeveloped in others. 

It also quotes and takes for granted the conclusion of Jared Diamond (my beloathed) so that is an immediate -1 star.

bb2328's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

5.0

An important read for anyone wanting to understand the arcs of history. 

rachelwalexander's review

Go to review page

3.0

For being a history of "the world," this was told almost entirely from a western perspective, with almost more pages devoted to the nuances of the French Revolution than to the entirety of China over 10,000+ years of human history. As with nearly everything focused on class analysis, I found discussions about the role of race frustratingly lacking or shallow. So with those caveats, this is a solid and comprehensive leftist history of Europe and to some degree the U.S.

misterfix's review against another edition

Go to review page

Although this is a fantastic book I decided to shelve it as a reference book vs a book I want to read at present.

amydiddle's review

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced

3.5

mothmans_mum's review

Go to review page

5.0

Best book ever

cook_memorial_public_library's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A 2017 staff favorite recommended by Rob. Check our catalog: https://encore.cooklib.org/iii/encore/search/C__Speople%27s%20history%20of%20the%20world%20harman__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=gold

belongsinamuseum's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

3.5

drbird's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

2.0

I’m a fan of history from the people’s perspective. Just wished those people weren’t mostly European. Seems like a chunk of history is missing and that this is basically a world history that Europeans would construct. It’s one thing to say that the West comes to dominate global events after the Colombian Exchange but this book just straight up can’t find a way to discuss India, countries of Africa, or China or the Mongols with anything more than a few pages of lip service.