Scan barcode
alexashabit's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Graphic: Medical content
Moderate: Animal cruelty and Sexism
Minor: Rape
haley49's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Death, Misogyny, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Body horror, Child death, Drug use, Gore, Sexism, Blood, and Death of parent
pooogsz's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Chronic illness, Death, Drug use, Gore, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Rape, Sexism, Terminal illness, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Grief, Medical trauma, Abortion, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, Pregnancy, Gaslighting, War, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
maralaene's review against another edition
The characters and overall story were beautifully written and captivating. It was not a fast-paced book, but I still felt pulled in to the story. Definitely worth a read if you enjoy historical fiction, with a very realistic approach for its strong female character.
Graphic: Death and Medical content
Moderate: Animal cruelty and Animal death
Minor: Child death, Rape, and Abortion
alyssapusateri's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Death, Misogyny, Sexism, Blood, Medical content, Medical trauma, Pregnancy, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Child death, Excrement, Death of parent, and Alcohol
Minor: Rape and Abortion
meganpbennett's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.0
The book was very well-written and engaging, and gave a really good look at the time period. I found some of the medical scenes a bit too accurate. As it was period-accurate, there was a lot of misogyny directed at Nora, who was only trying to better herself professionally.
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Death, Gore, Misogyny, Sexism, Blood, Medical content, Medical trauma, Death of parent, Pregnancy, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Rape, Abortion, and Suicide attempt
hownoveljo's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Child death, and Medical trauma
feverdreamhigh's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, and Misogyny
Moderate: Miscarriage and Abortion
Detailed descriptions of surgeries, autopsies and dissections throughout the book.plantybooklover's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
I've been burned by historical fiction, and I initially scrolled on by this book, but seeing it was the book for the Big Library Read- a global book club, I decided to give it a second look. (https://biglibraryread.com)
This book gets really 3.75 stars from me, it is a good, engrossing read, but had some flaws.
The story revolves around Nora Beady, a child who survived cholera and was essentially "kept" by the Doctor who nursed her back to health. Dr. Croft, is an unusual sort- painted as wholly dedicated to advancing the field of medicine and assisting people, he essentially uses that reputation to ignore many victorian social dictates and obligations. Nora is trained at his clinic and become adept in many areas of medical knowledge at the time. She is satisfied with assisting to run his clinic, dissection and painting illustrations. One day a dashing younger Doctor appears on the doorstep with no warning - invited by the absent minded Dr. Croft to learn and assist in the clinic. Since practicing medicine was not permitted for women in this time period, Nora is aghast at having the stranger invade her careful and protected world. Eventually she wins over the stranger, and this culminates in a successful surgery performed by the pair which then threatens to ruin her reputation, and the reputations of all those associated with the surgery. Nora's situation becomes precarious, and she faces judgement from physicians as well as people in her daily life- such as market women where she is purchasing parsley. Eventually a solution is presented by another somewhat mysterious Doctor from abroad, and it seems that Nora may be able to pursue both her romantic dreams and her medical ones. The books leaves off at the beginning of a new journey, and I see now that a sequel is planned. I enjoyed the book, but wasn't so enamored with it that I feel I need to read the second, but also, if the second were to fall into my hands, I'd probably read it. Characters were semi well developed, the plot moves the story along at a nice pace, and the author adds enough details from victorian era life without overwhelming the story with random bits of information.
what irked me entirely was this odd insistence on the characters all calling each other Dr. At that time, these British Docs would have all been called Mister. While that might confuse readers, a small entry noting that the Royal College of Surgeons only granted Diplomas, and thus recipients weren't able to use the Dr. title would have been sufficient. I found it especially unusual when an entire scene is dedicate to one of the Doctor's noting "that's Dr. so and so to you" when in reality, it would have definitely been Mister. (I feel like there might be a point of research that I have missed not being an expert!!) I also found Nora's romance situation to feel just wrong, I guess I felt she was better suited to her first, and not her second suitor, but alas, I did not control the narrative!
If you enjoy historical fiction, especially with a medical theme, you will enjoy this read. You can pick it up now at the library, via the Libby ap and have it read by July 26 when there will be an interview with the author via webinar! #BIGLIBRARYREAD
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Sexism, and Medical content
Moderate: Blood and Vomit