Scan barcode
midnightstory's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Chronic illness, Confinement, Cursing, Death, Domestic abuse, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Infidelity, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Toxic relationship, Grief, Religious bigotry, Abortion, Murder, Pregnancy, Toxic friendship, Abandonment, Colonisation, and Classism
Moderate: Adult/minor relationship, Bullying, Blood, Suicide attempt, and Alcohol
Minor: Animal death, Child death, Terminal illness, and Torture
ergative's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Unfortunately, since this was based on a historical event, it was constrained by (say it with me now) historical accuracy, which meant that I kept on hoping that once murder and poison had been deployed once, they would be deployed more than once. There were many people in the book who could have done with a spot of strychnine in their soup. But I did enjoy the fact that, in the eventual murder trial that ensues, every single accusation leveled against the defendant is, as it turns out, entirely true. She is not falsely accused of anything. Even the accusations of sorcery and witchcraft are accusations of actions that, as defined by the prosecution, she absolutely did undertake. And given that the book must turn out in the way that history records it having turned out, the fact that she is not innocently accused is satisfying.
In a way, after re-reading the chapter in Eleanor Herman's outstanding The Royal Art of Poison about the death of Sir Thomas Overbury, I rather think that this book would have given me what I wanted if the characters adhered more to their portrayals in the historical records. The idea of evil, calculating Anne Turner colluding with Franklin about exactly which poisons are strong enough to kill but weak enough not to kill too quickly, testing various decoctions on domestic pets, cackling and rubbing their hands wickedly, is so much more fun than the anxious, fretful, loving, well-meaning Anne Turner we get in this book. Jago says in her author's note that she wanted to humanize the people away from their villainous portrayals, but the villainous portrayals are so much more lively and engaging than what we got. Ah, well. I guess I can't criticize the book too much for being what the author intended it to be, rather than what I was hoping for.
Graphic: Animal death, Misogyny, and Rape
darcyjanea's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Death, Domestic abuse, Infidelity, Misogyny, Rape, Grief, Death of parent, Murder, and Pregnancy
Minor: Miscarriage and Suicide attempt