Scan barcode
sunkernplus's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
-I was personally excited to read this for school, for one thing. I'm what one would call a "true English major": aside from heteronormative and amatonormative m/f romance (because bi, pan, enbian and gray aromantic as well as quoiromantic) and a lot of YA novels, which, even if LGBT or T4T tend to feature heteronormative and amatonormative dynamics, I'm pretty much unbiased towards any book, from children's literature to erotica. I still found myself excited as I read it until a lot of the misogynistic chapters popped up, but then in later chapters marveled at the Nguyen's amazing prose, droll and dry sense of humor, and telling observations about American capitalist society (the society I was born, reared, and raised in, and know uncomfortably all too well). Perhaps, like Man, I have come to a dialectic synthesis: this book is both horribly misogynistic, and this book is a fantastic work of postmodernist literature, and both can be true at once. However, I still take points off for all of the female characters, even Lana and Sofia Mori, lacking particular interiority, and being mainly to motivate the male character's emotional suffering, which a great deal of it is understandable, and some portion of it (such as the killing of the "crapulent major", God, that fatphobic description of him and Sonny) being of his own making.
-Upon reaching the end of the novel and seeing that his work was inspired by Ralph Ellison's "Invisible Man", I did a mental whoop and fist pump. Like, "yes, I knew it, I knew that opening mimicked the opening prologue lines of Invisible Man, give me a prize!" To be fair, I had only read the prologue and first chapter to Ellison's work, as well as the missing draft chapter taking place in a psych ward. But the opening prologue was almost word for word, tone for tone the same without being plagiarism, and the style and tone of the novel draw heavily from Ellison, as well as the themes. I felt super smart when I guessed (today in fact) that this novel was a Vietnamese answer to Invisible Man.
-
The Watsonian thought was that the rape of Viet Nam was foreshadowed largely in part by his mother's implied rape and the main character's mixed race heritage, and by the main character's inability to watch Asia Soo act the scene in which she is raped, despite him being kind of a misogynistic creep towards Lana, who he knew when she was 16 and he was 25 and they were both family members essentially, and despite him being kind of a Nice Guy TM to Sofia Mori and even not having the scruples to refrain from hitting on Asia Soo herself, who was a lesbian, he could not watch her be raped because her character Mai's rape would remind him of the brutal rape the American soldiers committed on the agent who called herself Viet Nam, where she was raped to such brutality he believed her to be dead. In other words, he's very much the guilty character the CIA handbook talks about, the man who feels guilt not only at himself and about himself but projects guilt as coming from others.
The Doylist thought, however, refers to my interest in eroge, or erotic games, and their medium as storytelling and potential arguments for some well written eroge to perhaps qualify as postmodern works of fiction in themselves, and perhaps a lot of them less misogynistic even than The Sympathizer. In my time exploring the eroge genre, either playing eroge, playing clean versions of eroge, or listening to YouTuber Amelie Doree talk about eroge and argue for its legitimacy as art, I have found that even eroge that even depicts scenes of brutal rape, much like The Sympathizer did with Viet Nam's rape, tends to have less outward misogyny than The Sympathizer itself, in my opinion, because the women in a lot of eroge are depicted less as symbols of the main character's brokenness, or clear obvious conservative and always ugly and fat sticks in the mud, like a lot of leftist men depict women either in the left who they disagree with or consider prudish or women on the right who they rightfully disagree with but insult their appearances for being "conventionally ugly" in the case of The Sympathizer, but as humans, with interiority and identity and flaws and strengths and traumas that are as deep as the men in their lives, and in the case of queer eroge focused on women or lesbian eroge such as LOVE BAKUDAN or LOVE AND DEHUMANIZATION, are focused entirely on women and their inner lives, even as, in LOVE AND DEHUMANIZATION's case, the main female characters (she's plural) go through immense pain.
That's all my thoughts for now; I'm not good at reviews, but I'm pretty decent at voicing my many thoughts and opinions.
Graphic: Racial slurs, Rape, and War
Moderate: Racism, Rape, and Xenophobia
Minor: Fatphobia and Rape
zach_connolly's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Death, Genocide, Physical abuse, Racism, Torture, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Xenophobia, Murder, and War
aducharme4's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Confinement, Death, Gun violence, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Racial slurs, Racism, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Torture, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Police brutality, Kidnapping, Death of parent, Murder, Alcohol, Colonisation, and War
Moderate: Homophobia and Infidelity
perpetually_isolated_being's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Torture, Violence, and War
ninetyninecats's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? No
4.0
Graphic: Rape, Torture, Murder, and War
kcjulia's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Gun violence, Racism, Rape, Torture, Violence, Grief, Murder, Colonisation, and War
cecropiansea's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Child death, Racism, Rape, Murder, and War
goodvibes22's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Sexual assault, Violence, and War
mlareads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Rape, Xenophobia, and War
rutabagab's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Confinement, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Mental illness, Misogyny, Pedophilia, Physical abuse, Racism, Rape, Self harm, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Torture, Excrement, Death of parent, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Alcohol, and War