Scan barcode
sausome's review against another edition
2.0
I'm not entirely sure what to think of this book ... I mean, it was interesting -- always enjoy the 'otherworldly creatures of the night' kind of thing -- but I guess it read more like a series of connected short stories than an entire novel. Which isn't BAD, just not expected, I suppose.
Although, reading the author's afterword, the book began as various short stories published in different magazines, so I think Bradbury essentially did some creative weaving. I like that this edition has the artwork done by Charles Addams (yup, that Addams -- of Addams Family fame!) and that Bradbury and Addams had communicated about this set of stories before they saw light, because it totally reminded me of the Addams Family in a way. Also, in a vague sort of way (probably to do with the main character, Timothy, being a 10-year-old mortal boy amongst other creatures) it reminded me of Gaiman's Graveyard Book (which is awesome, by the way).
Anyhow. I feel sort of bad for not liking it more as it won a National Book Award. But I like this blurb about it (it's what hooked me in the first place, I think):
"High on a hill by a forked tree, the House beckons its family homeward, and they come--travelers from the lyrical, lush imagination of Ray Bradbury. From the Dust Returned chronicles a community of eternal beings: a mummified matriarch who speaks in dust; a sleeping daughter who lives through the eyes and ears of the creatures she visits in her dreams; an uncle with wings like sea-green sails. And there is also the mortal child Timothy, the foundling son who yearns to be like those he loves: to fly, to sleep in daytime, and to live forever. Instead, his task is to witness the family's struggle with the startling possibility of its own end."
Although, reading the author's afterword, the book began as various short stories published in different magazines, so I think Bradbury essentially did some creative weaving. I like that this edition has the artwork done by Charles Addams (yup, that Addams -- of Addams Family fame!) and that Bradbury and Addams had communicated about this set of stories before they saw light, because it totally reminded me of the Addams Family in a way. Also, in a vague sort of way (probably to do with the main character, Timothy, being a 10-year-old mortal boy amongst other creatures) it reminded me of Gaiman's Graveyard Book (which is awesome, by the way).
Anyhow. I feel sort of bad for not liking it more as it won a National Book Award. But I like this blurb about it (it's what hooked me in the first place, I think):
"High on a hill by a forked tree, the House beckons its family homeward, and they come--travelers from the lyrical, lush imagination of Ray Bradbury. From the Dust Returned chronicles a community of eternal beings: a mummified matriarch who speaks in dust; a sleeping daughter who lives through the eyes and ears of the creatures she visits in her dreams; an uncle with wings like sea-green sails. And there is also the mortal child Timothy, the foundling son who yearns to be like those he loves: to fly, to sleep in daytime, and to live forever. Instead, his task is to witness the family's struggle with the startling possibility of its own end."
adru's review against another edition
Paremat sorti Bradbury tekitab suurt elevust, aga siin läksin ainult mõnel korral tähelepanelikuks. Nende mõne hetke pärast tasus lugeda kyll.
feefie4o's review
adventurous
dark
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Loved the concept, some of the stories are not comfortable for a modern audience
Minor: Adult/minor relationship and Sexual harassment
bhawargi's review
3.25
alexcannotread's review against another edition
1.0
one of the most boring books I’ve ever read, I only finished it because I was to stubborn to quit. the non linearity of the plot and overuse of descriptive language made it really difficult to visualize what was happening. also, I was only really able to connect to timothy, cecy, and uncle einar because those were the only characters who had enough depth to them (although timothy really didn’t have much tbh, but he’s the main(?) character amidst too many characters to care about).
looking up the wiki, I saw that the most interesting chapters were ironically previously published short stories, which makes sense as to why those ones felt more fleshed out than the other chapters. “the sleeper and her dreams chapter” was the only really interesting chapter that wasn’t a previously published short story.
1 star because of how difficult it was to immerse myself in the story, find interest in the story, and understand parts of the book.
looking up the wiki, I saw that the most interesting chapters were ironically previously published short stories, which makes sense as to why those ones felt more fleshed out than the other chapters. “the sleeper and her dreams chapter” was the only really interesting chapter that wasn’t a previously published short story.
1 star because of how difficult it was to immerse myself in the story, find interest in the story, and understand parts of the book.
haley_j_casey's review against another edition
2.0
It wasn't bad, but it wasn't really my thing. In the end I felt like there was no point to the book except for some fun takes on an Addams-Family-esque group of people, and that wasn't enough plot to keep me intrigued.
Sorry, Mr. Bradbury!
Sorry, Mr. Bradbury!
kgirl_kkk's review against another edition
adventurous
emotional
informative
lighthearted
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
jesslenc's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.0
chemifox's review against another edition
adventurous
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0