akswaneee's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
This book features a cameo from the leading characters of her first novel, and I can't help but imagine all of them sitting down in the fictional universe they inhabit and discovering that their love stories are exactly the same.
I truly hope that Ali Hazlewood's next book pushes her work into new territory. It's a mark of a good writer that I'm even willing to read it at this point.
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Sexism
mallorypen's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
The fake dating trope is a red herring here for a mild antagonists to lovers trope, and that is … fine. I do love me a solid fake dating trope because the Yearning™️ is always exquisite, and this wasn’t so much a yearning tale as it was a self-realization story. Which is fine!
Elsie’s story arc was fun to follow, especially as she came to terms with her compulsive people-pleasing and lying. I adored the development of all the female friendships -George especially - and I was pleased to see the resolution with Cece. I also loved the exploration of her Type 1 with her relationship to her pod and how people reacted to it.
The cheese thing was a little weird.
Jack flirted seriously with being a Gary Stu. He was saved from that fate by the skin of his teeth - the article thing didn’t super do it for me as like, a nasty thing because of his age when he wrote it and the fact that Dr. L, who was clearly evil from the beginning, was equally at fault for it being published. But the presumption Jack displays for knowing what’s best was a good flaw for his character. The bad flaw that I didn’t super love was that he essentially mansplained Elsie’s emotional hang ups to her until she got there herself? I don’t know. Im still kind of processing how I feel on that front. The whole “I’m ready to marry you immediately and was ashamed to be lusting after my brother’s girlfriend” stuff was SPLENDID, though, so kudos for that.
As for Elsie being demi; I loved Olive’s journey in The Love Hypothesis, and appreciated how her arc was resolved around her identity. I felt similarly for Elsie’s arc, but it was SO similar to Olive it felt like there’s only one way to be demi in this universe. It felt a little lazy, to be honest.
And Dr. L can go jump in a ditch.
Minor: Sexism
peripato's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Sexual content
Minor: Emotional abuse and Sexism
samchase112's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Sexual content and Sexism
Moderate: Medical content and Cursing
amandaboyer's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Sexual content, Misogyny, Chronic illness, Sexism, Gaslighting, and Medical content
Moderate: Death of parent, Sexual assault, and Toxic relationship
dogoodwithbooks's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
As someone who’s read Hazelwood’s two prior STEMinist novels, I absolutely love her latest addition Love, Theoretically.
With Love, Theoretically having a much more distinct plot and characters compared to her other works, I found myself able to enjoy the same feelings I had like the first time I read her work. Witty banter under an easy-to-understand STEM context? Check. Strong female lead that you’re able to relate and maybe see yourself being friends with? Check. A swoonworthy romance that will keep you rooting for the couple till the very end? Check and check.
If you want a read that captures the magic of The Love Hypothesis into a brand new story, you should keep an eye out for Love, Theoretically.
Graphic: Misogyny, Outing, Sexism, Chronic illness, and Emotional abuse
Moderate: Death of parent and Acephobia/Arophobia
tectonixduchess's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Medical content and Sexual content
Moderate: Sexism
pau_line's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Trotzdem wurden auch Themen eingearbeitet, die wirklich interessant waren.
Aufgrund der doch häufig vorkommenden Wissenschaftsbegriffen und Physikinsidern, war es manchmal etwas schwierig zu verstehen. Ich hab auch nicht alle Witze und Wortspiele verstanden...passiert wohl, wenn man in Physik nie aufgepasst hat.
Die Charaktere waren super umgesetzt. Es gab keine Figur, der ich nichts abgewinnen konnte.
Sehr süßes Buch!!
Graphic: Misogyny, Sexism, and Chronic illness
Moderate: Death of parent and Infidelity
itschelseaw's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.25
The trope of "big, strong tall man" and "tiny woman he can fit in his pocket" remains strong with her writing, but this time it included calling Jack's hands "paws" which is an immediate ick for me (see my dislike of "Bittersweet" by Sarina Bowen for more). Knocked down 1/2 a star just for that tbh.
I think the premise was interesting, but all of the characters felt so 1-2d that it fell flat in a major way. I wanted to know more about Cece and her life, and treat her as an actual 3d character but I didn't even learn she majored in humanities until the very end of the book.
I'm glad Elsie eventually stuck up for herself, but MAN it was grueling getting there at times. Girl needs therapy!!!
Jack's whole personality is: brooding, secretly feminist, desperately in love with Elsie, a woman he thought was dating his brother and he only knew lies about up until she was interviewing for the position at MIT (but he was already basically in love with her at that point AND IT WAS ALL A LIE????? I'm honestly just?????). Jack feels like he SHOULD be a dream, but all I got was red flag after red flag with him.
Listen, Hazlewood got her start writing fanfic, and good for her! It's just obvious that she's still essentially writing fanfic with the same tropes that she used before, and after 3 books it's repetitive and boring. Do I love fanfics? Absolutely! But there's a difference (for me) between fanfic, where you're using fandom inspired and related tropes (Rylo tropes included), but once you switch to published fiction it's really difficult to use the same tropes and make it feel fresh. The tropes in this one felt on the verge of expired. I don't think I'll be checking out her future books because I don't trust that she'll move away from the tropes she's been using for the past 3.
Moderate: Sexism, Misogyny, Abandonment, and Death of parent
evelynyle_88's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
I love the development of their slowburn romance. And I adore Elsie so much. She is brave for stand for herself and turned to be a better person she should be. I love this book so much!
For me... Love, Theoretically is the best book I've ever read from Ali. Thank you for making STEM themed book so fun to read, Ali! Applaud!
Can't wait to read more books from you. Check & Mate next!
Graphic: Chronic illness, Sexual content, and Sexism
Moderate: Death of parent, Emotional abuse, and Misogyny
Minor: Acephobia/Arophobia and Outing