megmo's review
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism and Death of parent
Moderate: Grief, Death, and Dementia
Minor: War
conbeeni's review against another edition
emotional
inspiring
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Was recommended this book by a dear friend and I'm so glad I was. When I started, I found it hard to anticipate where the whole thing was going (not in a bad way, it just kept me on my toes), but as I read on, the sorrow of it all really started to creep up on me, only to culminate in tears during the final chapter. The tragedy of it lies in all that is unsaid.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death of parent
Moderate: Antisemitism and War
Minor: Grief
oceanwriter's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
At first, I found the book painfully slow (and admittedly uninteresting). Though I can't say it exactly picked up the pace, I got more invested. I enjoyed the exploration of Stevens' reserved relationships and the dedication to his work. The messages of the story are subtle. Compared to other books not a lot happens, but that somehow seems to resonate deeper. Even though the book is being told by Stevens, Miss Kenton's longing comes through strongly despite the wall Stevens' has built surrounding any sort of intimacy.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death of parent
Moderate: Antisemitism
Minor: Grief, War, and Death
bisexualwentworth's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
This is one of the best books I've ever read. I just didn’t necessarily enjoy it. It’s a fascinating, layered, beautifully-written character study of one of the most boring characters I’ve ever encountered. He’s a deeply tragic figure in a lot of ways, but wow.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death of parent and Antisemitism
Moderate: War, Grief, Racism, and Death
nofacelif's review against another edition
challenging
lighthearted
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
I enjoyed that the protagonist's flaws and character growth were a significant part of the novel and the discussions surrounding dignity. Ishiguro brilliantly manages to establish a political undertone without it being the main focus. However, I think I just didn't connect much with the novel. There isn't really a story, and it's very slow-paced and boring at times. Therefore, it came as a letdown after reading Never Let Me Go.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism and Death of parent
Moderate: War and Grief
paulinevb's review against another edition
dark
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism and Death of parent
Moderate: War and Grief
thebakerbookworm's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
This book is very slow-moving, with a lot of reflection and internal debate, particularly about what it means to have dignity. I had mixed feelings while reading it—it's not very long but took me a while to get through; I was expecting more plot; our narrator is a bit unreliable (or at least, not honest with himself about the true nature of events he relays), is detached, and makes frustrating decisions. There's no real climax at the end, no real resolution. I was left a little confused.
But I read this for book club, and this book lends itself to some excellent discussions. We talked about dignity, we talked about decision-making and owning up to your life choices, we talked about what makes a person good and the importance of banter. There's a reason this book won the Booker Prize back in 1989, when it was released. And though I'm not sure that I loved it, I can recognize the brilliant writing style and the themes and emotions it brings up that makes it good literature.
Also, it's impossible to read this and not imagine Mr. Carson and Mrs. Hughes as Mr. Stevens and Miss Kenton.
But I read this for book club, and this book lends itself to some excellent discussions. We talked about dignity, we talked about decision-making and owning up to your life choices, we talked about what makes a person good and the importance of banter. There's a reason this book won the Booker Prize back in 1989, when it was released. And though I'm not sure that I loved it, I can recognize the brilliant writing style and the themes and emotions it brings up that makes it good literature.
Also, it's impossible to read this and not imagine Mr. Carson and Mrs. Hughes as Mr. Stevens and Miss Kenton.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death of parent, Grief, and Antisemitism
Moderate: Bullying
scruffie's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Didn't feel slow-paced to me. Then again, I have been getting used to Ishiguro's writing style. Very predictable story, but quite an emotional journey. Never Let Me Go was the first of Ishiguro's I read and I'm already looking forward to reading a third one.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death of parent
Moderate: Antisemitism
Minor: Grief and Death
bookcaptivated's review against another edition
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Antisemitism and Death of parent
Minor: Grief
sherbertwells's review against another edition
challenging
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Beyond its starched, Booker-Prize-Winning exterior, Kazuo Ishiguro’s 1989 novel The Remains of the Day is the story of an apologist. Stevens, the narrator and a well-respected butler near the end of his career, spends half of his 200 pages stoically defending the reputation of his former employer, whose wrongs—it is evidence of Stevens’ success that I do not know if ‘wrongs’ is the proper word—slowly crystallize between pages and pages of curt, nostalgia-tinged minutiae.
I am told that many of Ishiguro’s novels are about looking back, and this is certainly the case in The Remains of the Day. By the time the story begins, the aristocratic era is over and Stevens’ new employer nonchalantly allows his butler to tour the English countryside in a borrowed Ford. The ‘commoners’ along the route, which stretches from Oxfordshire to Cornwall, seem fairly happy: Britain is finally safe from the Nazis and Stephens hopes to see an old friend again. So why does his mind return to Darlington Hall, to the character of Lord Darlington and to the unacknowledged sacrifices he performed across years of upright service? Were things always like this?
Perhaps they were. Revelations hit like airbags in a wreck. After reading one chilling memory—I recommend you read it yourself—I closed the book and asked my father incredulously, “Was this in the [1993 Merchant Ivory] movie?” It was not. And The Remains of the Day is full of incidents like it.
If you like unreliable narrators, you will love this book. Stevens is like a man examining a jigsaw puzzle, turning over each piece in his hand and trying to convince himself it doesn’t belong in the obvious place. He’s not pitiable, though; his voice is so controlled and his (Ishiguro’s) prose is so pleasant that on the final page I felt a little nostalgia for that age in which I had never lived and whose flaws had so recently been dissected.
I wish I could summon quotes to demonstrate the book’s resplendence, but I recently returned The Remains of the Day to my local library. I do not love the book enough to purchase a physical copy, but I have found in it enough admirable qualities—quiet pain, intriguing tangents and the second-best narrator I’ve ever read—to continue with Ishiguro’s other works. Am I sorry?
I shouldn’t be sorry, should I?
Content Warnings
Moderate: Antisemitism and Death of parent
Minor: Child death and Grief