Reviews with content warning for Forced institutionalization - L'uomo che scambiò sua moglie per un cappello

A warm, empathetic approach to the harrowing existential horror pit of neuropathology.
While sometimes it may get a bit slow or overly technical for a lay audience, I believe the book balances the tasks of presenting thorough neuropathological case studies, making interesting narratives of them, highlighting the human individuals behind the conditions, and analyzing the broader patterns these cases reflect in science and society with a lot of poise, compassion, and curiosity.
Very recommended to anyone looking to pursue a career in the field.

Content Warnings

kat_smith24's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful informative reflective slow-paced

3.5

Though the language is outdated and paternalistic, this book offers a surprisingly nuanced approach to (at the time) rarer neurological disorders.

Content Warnings

navayiota's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective slow-paced

4.25

At the start of the book, I was 100% sure this would be a 5 star read. Even though the words used for the patients are now considered slurs, the doctor still handled them with care and compassion, and recognised the ableism that is often present in neurodivergent people's lives. That was surprising to me, since even nowadays I hear doctors completely invalidate me, others, our experiences and trauma. I was so prepared to love this book. And I still love the first 15 or so chapters, those will always be dear to me, but damn, it really went downhill in the last couple of chapters... It felt like they were written by a completely different person. So condescending and dismissive, and it was incredibly hard to get through. Little moments of compassion still came through, but it felt like searching in the trash for food that hasn't rotted. It was really disappointing and somewhat triggering to hear about people who weren't that different from me being called stupid and basically a waste of time and resources. I felt betrayed, since I had come to really like and trust the author. I'm not even sure how I feel about what the book ends on, I agree that society often decides an autistic person is useless and doesn't even give them the chance to show their skills and interests, to earn their place in society, but the way it was said felt so patronising. As if a disabled person is completely unable to do this by themselves, and need someone else to first give them permission. I understand that all this was written during a time where people were locked up simply for being different, so it definitely would have been a lot harder to do things by themselves back then.. but I feel like context could have been added. (the edition I listened to was released in 2019 and there were other edits in it, so I don't see why this couldn't have been one of them) I think this should be mandatory reading for people who want to learn about the struggles of neurodivergent people in the past, and recommended reading for people interested in psychology. The language used is pretty understandable but still scientific, and I can recall most of the disorders easily. This is well written, and I like it even though I'm disappointed with it.

Content Warnings

funky_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative slow-paced

1.75

Content Warnings

carysisamelt's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective sad slow-paced

3.5

an extremely interesting book, even in the 21st century. however, there is a lot of things that made me uncomfortable when reading this, namely the use of the r-slur (though used as an actually medical term, someone should definitely revise this) and the complete inaccuracy when describing autism. i really liked the start but ending with the chapter “simpletons” (or name to that effect) left a sour taste in my mouth.

Content Warnings

sunn_bleach's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative medium-paced

3.0

Interesting but in a way I didn’t expect. This is very much a neurology book written in the early 80s, with all the language and paradigms that implies. The dead-serious use of the word “retarded” and unironic appeals to Freud and Luria are kind of shocking for 40+ years later. But I’m kind of struck at how much Sacks so obviously cared for his patients as people, not just case studies. That kind of narrative is important for humanizing the humans we treat.

Content Warnings

zoebill96's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative slow-paced

2.5

Content Warnings

More...