Reviews

The Good Doctor by Damon Galgut

suknee's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

fictionfan's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Channelling Greene...

Having retreated to a remote country hospital following the messy break-up of his marriage, Doctor Frank Eloff is in a reasonably contented rut. The hospital is in a town that was briefly the capital of a newly set-up homeland in South Africa. But politics move on, and the homeland ceased to exist when apartheid ended, so that now the town is sparsely occupied and the hospital has very few patients and only a tiny staff. But one day a new doctor shows up – young Laurence Waters, who has chosen to do his year's compulsory post-qualifying service in this remote spot. Idealistic and somewhat naive, Laurence wants to do good, and his presence becomes a catalyst for change. This is a story of disillusionment – of a man and of a country.

In both style and subject matter, the book reminded me very much of Graham Greene. Galgut has that same spare precision with words, that ability to conjure a pervading air of menace and decay, that empathetic insight into the fallibilities of human nature. His main character and narrator, Frank, also has all the attributes of a Greene protagonist – somewhat passive, without the strength of character to be either fully good or fully bad, an observer forced to become an unwilling participant. His marriage ended years ago, but he is treading water, unwilling to finalise the divorce – symbolic of the end of apartheid not yet having produced the hoped-for change. The lives of all the hospital staff are in limbo, each waiting for a change that seems increasingly unlikely – the head of the hospital waiting for promotion back to the city, Frank waiting to fill her shoes when – if – she goes, a married couple from Cuba, one wishing to return, the other wishing to stay, and their marriage slowly disintegrating under the strain.

Along comes Laurence, fresh and full of hope, forcing the others to recognise the lethargy they've sunk into. The question seems to be – will Laurence change them or will they destroy his idealistic optimism? The answer never seems in doubt.

There was much I loved about this – the writing, the characterisation of Frank, the creation of an air of uneasy melancholy and later of menace and fear. I was totally involved for well over half of the book. And then, and I can't quite put my finger on the reason, it fell away and rather lost me towards the end. I felt the plot wasn't developed well enough – it all seemed contrived to deliver an ending. (Yes, I know all plots are contrived to deliver endings, but the good ones don't feel as if they are.) The drama all takes place off the page, which does stop it reading like a thriller, which it isn't, but also somehow stops it from delivering an emotional impact. When the major event finally occurred, I found I didn't much care. And that made me realise that, although Frank is fully and excellently realised, the other characters hadn't come to life for me, not even Laurence. In a sense, I think that's part of the point – Frank is detached from emotional involvement, and therefore so are we. But even when he is finally jarred out of his apathy, his efforts at playing a more active part are half-hearted and soon over. Again, I think this is meant to be symbolic of the failure of the hopes of the new South Africa, but whatever, it left me shrugging a bit.

I also developed the impression, rightly or wrongly, that this feeling of utter depression about the state of post-apartheid South Africa was terribly white. Galgut doesn't romanticise the past in any way – quite the reverse – but he also gives no feeling for the immense hope that surely existed among black South Africans, finally free from the yoke of subjugation. Even when things didn't improve as dramatically as people hoped, I found the idea of apathetic acceptance unrealistic. I'd have expected continued hope, anger, possibly despair – not apathy. But perhaps I'm wrong. Perhaps in the rural areas things went on much as they always had.

I certainly enjoyed Galgut's writing and found the book thought-provoking if not entirely convincing. I'll be looking forward to reading more of his work and, despite my reservations, I do recommend this one – although it tailed off for me at the end, I found it an absorbing and worthwhile read up to that point.

www.fictionfanblog.wordpress.com

bookishkath's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

jessbarbour's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Perfectly sums up the problems with modern day South Africa

brooklynbrianreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

4th Galgut book in 4 months...phenomenal writer!

z3r081's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

tbr_tyrant's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

In a dilapidated, poorly-staffed, under-funded, patient-sparse hospital located in a near-deserted, unnamed, South African "homeland" town, we're thrust into a post-Apocalyptic-like, post-Apartheid microcosm.
Our narrator is Frank Eloff, a cynical, disillusioned, indifferent, soon-to-be-divorced doctor who whiles away his dried-up existence on purposeless, routine-rotten, hippocratic duties... Until a young, fresh-faced, idealistic, naïve, enigmatic, newly-appointed doctor by the name of Laurence Waters enters the picture and the desolate setting at the novel's onset, sparking a Spring-tide change, not only to the rundown medical practice and its lingering denizens, but to the set-in-his-ways, nihilistic narrator's life.

It's Conrad meets Coetzee as they rendezvous with Greene; blending shades of HEART OF DARKNESS with generous doses of DISGRACE and echoes of THE QUIET AMERICAN.
This was my introduction to the deliciously despondent, mellifluously melancholic, South African-tanged, atmospheric writing of Damon Galgut. I'll be reading the novel that won him the 2021 Booker Prize, THE PROMISE, next... And hopefully other books I come across written by this impressive author.

msjoanna's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Lovely, spare prose, a brilliant ending, and thoughtful musings on innocence, experience, and saving the world. Narrated by Frank, an older and experienced doctor working in a near-failing hospital in South Africa, the book traces the arrival of a young and idealistic new doctor doing a year of community service. As the new doctor tries to "do something" to help the local residents, conflict surfaces between the entrenched staff, the locals, and the new doctor.

But throughout the book, the conflict stays just below the surface, just out of reach of the narrator and the reader. Rather than wrapping the story with tidy moral bows, the narrator muses on how difficult it actually is to figure out the right action in complicated situations.

slrsmith's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Peculiar, sparse, at times Kafka-esque.

joesb's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75