Reviews

In Dog We Trust by Neil S. Plakcy

karen_reads's review

Go to review page

adventurous emotional hopeful mysterious relaxing medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Loveable characters? Yes

4.5

lgpiper's review

Go to review page

3.0

This is apparently the first of a series of books about one Steve Levitan. He has recently been paroled from jail in California and has removed himself to Bucks County in Pennsylvania, where he grew up, and where he has a house due to his father's having passed away while he was in prison. He was jailed for computer hacking, and has promised never to hack again. A parole officer checks his computer every week or so to make sure there are no inappropriate searches.

Steve has a job as an adjunct at a nearby college, teaching English. That's interesting in that he complains a lot about correcting grammar and so forth. But, what's interesting is there are a number errors in this book, some grammatical some inappropriate words. "Physician heal thyself."

Anyway, Steve's next door neighbor is murdered and he inherits said neighbor's golden retriever. Here to fore, Steve has not been a dog person, so perhaps he can be excused for doing dumb things like using a retractable leash and describing the Golden in terms more appropriate to a Rottweiler or bull dog. I mean, Goldens are not notably slobbery, in my experience at least. Perhaps my Goldens, Cider Anne and Brewster, were notable exceptions, but I didn't notice slobber problems at the Yankee Golden Retriever Rescue, when I was looking to adopt. [Adopting Goldens were awesomes decision on my part, by the way].

Anyway, Steve tries to be good, but he just can't help himself with the hacking. He manages to keep it secret, mostly. Also, he eventually finds the murderer of his neighbor. I dunno, the book was ok, but I didn't find it all that intriguing. I'll likely not move on with the series. Weird, because I rather like mysteries and am besotted by Golden Retrievers.

auntbopp's review

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

crystal_bookworm's review

Go to review page

3.0

Readable

I found this book readable. The plot was interesting. Although I found the writing to be filled with quite a lot of waffle, which I think took away from the good plot. I won't be reading any more books by this author.

mareich's review

Go to review page

4.0

This murder mystery is the first in a series and was good enough to make me want to continue with the series. The plot is just intricate enough to make the reader work a bit to try to figure out what's going on (along with the human protagonist Steve and his newly acquired Golden Retriever, Rochester). There are four murders, actually, and initially at least two separate cases. One involves the murder of Steve's neighbor (and owner of Rochester) which has very few clues for Steve's old friend the local police detective. The other case involves a deepening identity theft of Steve's old piano teacher, a widow who has been unable to keep track of the various investments her husband left her. Rochester provides invaluable clues for both cases, which begin to seem to overlap in motives and perpetrators. All in all, Steve learns how to be a dog companion and to adjust to being an ex-con trying to rebuild his life. It's a good story and told well, so I'll be back for more. Besides, I suspect that Rochester is a lot smarter than everyone assumes.

kesnit's review

Go to review page

4.0

The book started slow and I considered giving up on it more than once. Eventually, it did pick up and ended very well. I did enjoy the stuff about the narrator's hacking.

Is the book believable? Nope. There's a lot of "right person in the right place at the right time." It is a fun read? Yes, it is (eventually).

debmed's review

Go to review page

lighthearted mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

More...