Scan barcode
sparklefarm's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? Yes
3.75
Minor: Violence and Murder
raptorq's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Moderate: Violence
Minor: Blood and Medical content
sophiesmallhands's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Violence and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Suicide, Blood, and Murder
puttingwingsonwords's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Moderate: Suicide, Violence, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Animal cruelty
booksandteatime's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Moderate: Violence, Blood, Vomit, and Suicide attempt
kappafrog's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.0
The worldbuilding was really flimsy, which was really surprising since the worldbuilding in Infomocracy by the same author had been so interesting and a big appeal of the book. It made no sense that humanity had settled on a gas giant instead of one of Jupiter's many moons. I felt like the author had an image and a vibe she started with of people on platforms in the misty gases of Jupiter, but it didn't pan out into worldbuilding that made any sense. We got no sense of the government, any justice system outside of these romantic but unrealistic lone wolf Investigators, or even the extent of the population. Were there different languages, cultures, etc? None of this was explored and left the world feeling like an empty stage for the two main characters to zoom around. The characters have to wear "atomscarfs" to protect them from the atmosphere even though they live in a mostly climate-controlled bubble. The extinction of all Earth animals and plants is a major plot point in the book, but there are pigeons and cats mentioned in passing, who aren't wearing atomscarfs, so the purpose of the atomspheric protection gear is rendered moot at the same time as one of the biggest plot points is casually undercut. The role of misogyny in the world was unclear, with some vague references to it still being a factor in this far-future world (for no clear reason) and cringeworthy repetition of internet-speak like "Why are men" as a response.
The plot also had a lot of problems. The
All in all, a really disappointing showing from an author who I think is capable of much better. There is nothing to recommend about this book beyond the cool prologue. It felt like a sketch of ideas the author thought would be cool but didn't make any sense when put together.
Graphic: Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Death, Emotional abuse, Suicide, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Police brutality, Suicide attempt, Murder, and Toxic friendship
Minor: Misogyny, Vomit, and Medical content
devynreadsnovels's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Moderate: Death, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Murder, Colonisation, and Injury/Injury detail
geekmom's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
3.75
Moderate: Death and Violence
erebus53's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
It is, for all that, a Holmesian mystery trope, with a gifted and socially inept savant investigator and her smart-but-not-too-smart counterpart being the conversation partner and someone to bounce ideas off of.
The relationship between the two is not without its flaws. Both women are focused on their own goals, while being more and more captivated by each other, but they aren't always great at communicating their plans or trusting each other enough to be forthright about.. ok.. anything.
The science fiction leans a bit hard on the fiction and is a little spare on the science. Some of the sciencey bits I have seen done better in other places (*cough* Neal Stephenson *cough*) and bits of it I find contrast with the approach of other stories that keep a genetic record of Terran biodiversity. It's cute though, and is some futuristic world-building which forms a comfy backdrop for the human story.
I think it's also got the right pace.. if it was longer, I probably wouldn't be as interested in finding a copy of the next one in the series.
Graphic: Torture, Violence, Blood, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Confinement and Colonisation
thereaderfriend's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? N/A
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
Graphic: Confinement, Gore, Violence, Blood, Medical content, and Injury/Injury detail