Reviews

Aura by Carlos Fuentes

branwynnemay's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.75

This is cool. I bet it was amazing in the 60s. It has a great atmosphere, like The Witch, but way trippier. I love that it’s a bilingual book if I want to practice reading in Spanish. 

christopherc's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Carlos Fuentes’ 1962 novella AURA is something of a ghost story and a play on identity. Felipe Montero is a Mexican academic who is attracted one day by a classified ad promising an unusually high salary to whomever can speak French and fulfill secretarial duties. He goes to the address specified in the advertisement and discovers that he'll be working for the ancient widow Consuelo Llorente, editing the memoires of her late husband who fought on the wrong side in the 19th century and suffered exile in France. But soon Felipe is less interested in the yellowed papers he is tasked with than with Aura, his employer's beautiful young niece. I shall say no more of the plot lest I spoil the surprise.

The novella is written in the second person, in such a way that it feels like you, the reader, are stepping through the story moment-by-moment, e.g. the very beginning of the story: “Lees ese anuncio: una oferta de esa naturaleza no se hace todos los días. Lees y relees el aviso. Parece dirigido a ti, a nadie más.” Fuentes then succeeds in creating a feeling of claustrophobia and vague dread as Felipe -- and you -- step through the badly lit and decaying colonial mansion in which the story is set.

I was somewhat less happy with the pacing of the story towards the end, which leads to what I feel is an overhasty conclusion. As much as I wanted to proclaim the story a classic while reading, once I finished it I couldn't help but feel some measure of dissatisfaction. Still, it's a quick read and it might appeal to others. At the very least it’s worth reading as one of the most prominent Mexican stories of the 20th century.

losthighway's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.75

yasnaj's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious fast-paced

4.0

julieshuff's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Been trying to get back into reading Spanish to not lose the language.

The second person narration makes it read like (very gothic) fanfiction 🤣

I didn’t love the voice of the female narrator-very soft and weak, though that might have been a strategic choice. 

maurilior's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.75

julietaricci's review against another edition

Go to review page

No entendí absolutamente nada, genial

mariannediaz's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Esta novela corta, cortísima, que se lee de una sola sentada porque no te suelta nunca, es un relato que mezcla el horror y la belleza, el tema de la identidad, del paso del tiempo, de la muerte; un relato poblado por lo fantástico que, sin embargo, no deja de ser una historia de amor. Lo amé.

hopehamilton's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

esta es mi primera novela en español que leo! estoy súper orgulloso de mí mismo

sketchugo's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0