tomjackson's review
4.0
a lot better than i expected, and significantly less conspiracy stuff. a solid if unimaginative history of an interesting topic
chuckcrossett's review
3.0
The book is worthy enough to scan through, since it has good tidbits of knowledge. But it sorely needed a good editor to improve its readability. There are huge leaps of topic, confusing sentences, redundancies and errors.
More...