Reviews

The Chalk Man by C.J. Tudor

kilppes's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Achei muito fraco. O suspense não era desenvolvido propriamente. Apesar da leitura fluir, não existia a antecipação e o medo que certos thrillers causam (ou acho que deveriam causar). O protagonista fez com que fosse muito mais difícil ainda se conectar, por que ele era tão indiferente aos acontecimentos que tudo parecia dormente. Os plot twists aconteceram, e nesse sentido a autora conseguiu dispor todas as dicas necessárias pra você desenvolver tudo, mas achei pouco convincente certas descrições. Achei as motivações dos personagens fracas demais, especialmente quanto a morte de Mickey. Achei também muito irrealista a velha idosa com problema de memória lembrar dessa criança que ela viu uma única vez na vida à trinta anos ao auge dos seus noventa - feita unicamente pra antecipar o plot. Creio também que toda a situação de Nicky ficou mal resolvida, seus sentimentos e suas intenções. A linha do tempo do dia do assassinato da menina do Twist foi também muito irrealista, e ninguém pode me convencer que um menino conseguiria esconder uma cabeça decepada por mais de um mes no próprio quarto, não importe quantas vigas de madeira distanciem ela do ar.
Não leve tudo isso a mal - a escrita realmente flue. Consegui ler inteiro em um dia, isso por que a tradução dela foi muito bem feita. Não posso atestar pela original, mas a Intrínseca fez um bom trabalho. Era muito prazeroso também ler considerando o projeto gráfico. Mas não vale o preço de capa de 50 reais - paguei 19,90 e acho que é o preço que o livro merece.
Logo nas primeiras páginas comentei com minha mãe: - Seria uma merda se fosse mais um livro em que o protagonista omite os fatos importantes pra soltar um plot twist idiota no final, espero que a autora não me decepcione. Infelizmente, foi exatamente o que aconteceu. O narrador não confiável já não é um artifício narrativo tão interessante quanto um dia já foi. Talvez se fosse meu primeiro suspense eu teria gostado muito mais, mas faltou o tempero e a emoção de uma narrativa que me fizesse antecipar mais. Muitas cenas longas e introspectivas que não acrescentavam na narrativa (e eu AMO cenas introspectivas. Só achei exagerado os hábitos alcoólicos do protagonista, por que já tem demais disso na literatura).
Enfim, vou emprestar esse livro a todos os interessados, mas não recomendarei ativamente - tem livros melhores esperando ser lidos.

katrinaxx's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Not that great of writing, and pretty short, all things considered. But it was ok.

briartherose's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Not bad at all. A bit derivative, especially of Stephen King, and the need to end every chapter on some sort of whammy grew very tiresome. But it had a really nicely nasty beginning and ending, and sufficiently sustained my interest in between.

ayeshhasrinath's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

archiegitdog's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I have just finished this book and cant understand why its not got a higher mark. This is the first time I have ever brought a book into work, got in early just so I could finish it off. Maybe others saw the ending way before me but I loved this. Well written!!!

jenpaul13's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Playing with chalk has an innocent, childlike quality to it, but for one group of friends in C. J. Tudor's The Chalk Man it has a sinister undertone. 

To read this, and other book reviews, visit my website: http://makinggoodstories.wordpress.com/.

In 1986 Eddie and his friends develop a code of chalk drawings to secretly communicate with each other to arrange various adventures and meet ups. One day the chalk drawings lead the group to discover the dead body of a local girl, which threw the quiet, small English village into the scandalous spotlight. Thirty years later, the group of friends has each received a mysterious chalk figure in the mail. When one of the friends winds up dead, Eddie tries to save himself by launching into investigation mode to figure out what happened to that girl decades ago, even if the truth is unfathomable.

Quickly paced, the narrative alternates between the past and present of Eddie's life, bringing forth relevant details to help build the suspense. There were a few too many coincidences throughout the story that built toward the ending, and though I'm often fond of unreliable narrators, the lack of an adequately seeded build left me a bit unpleasantly jarred at the end. Well-written overall with a familiar boyhood adventure story but still unique, this is a strong debut novel that grips readers' attention and provokes thought on knowing and understanding people's motivations.

Overall, I'd give it a 3.5 out of 5 stars.

*I received this book from Blogging for Books for this review.

huntland's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny mysterious tense medium-paced

4.25

becca1219's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced

5.0

ilman002's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This book was pretty solid up until the final 50 pages. If I was 12 years old, I'd be drooling over these incredible plot twists. Unfortunately, I'm a bit older and I'm just not buying it. The unbelievable incompetence of police, eye-rolling revelations, and that ridiculous final chapter that serves as an epilogue ruin a story that has some potential. For a debut author, C.J. Tudor can write and I really enjoyed the first quarter of the book. Ultimately, the book falls flat. Having said that, I will be checking her future works, just because the potential is undeniably there.

adinadwd's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Eh, not that memorable for me...