Scan barcode
piabo's review against another edition
2.0
Only the last rule made sense. The rest tried hard to be interesting or funny, but were contradicting, not science-based, and just factually wrong. I didn't enjoy it.
Such a big load of crap. How can you demonize food that much?
Food that arrives through the window of your car isn't food? Aha, what is it, then? It's edible, and it can keep your body fueled.
And other claims, too, just sound stupid. Why, please?
This guy is contradicting himself in a few claims. One rule says we should not make any exceptions, and the other clearly says that obviously, not everything is affected by this rule, and we should be open-minded.
I just don't like the whole premise of the book. And I am clearly emotionally invested and felt attacked. I just wish people would stop hating on food and people in larger bodies so much. This approach has not solved anything.
Such a big load of crap. How can you demonize food that much?
Food that arrives through the window of your car isn't food? Aha, what is it, then? It's edible, and it can keep your body fueled.
And other claims, too, just sound stupid. Why, please?
This guy is contradicting himself in a few claims. One rule says we should not make any exceptions, and the other clearly says that obviously, not everything is affected by this rule, and we should be open-minded.
I just don't like the whole premise of the book. And I am clearly emotionally invested and felt attacked. I just wish people would stop hating on food and people in larger bodies so much. This approach has not solved anything.
klosterphobia's review against another edition
informative
inspiring
fast-paced
3.0
Michael Pollan's "Food Rules" is designed as a concise guide, distilling his extensive research into simple, digestible advice. The core message—eat whole foods to avoid Western diseases like diabetes—is clear and valuable. However, the book could benefit from more nuance.
Some of the rules are presented with an intensity that might be impractical or unnecessarily restrictive. For instance, the admonition to avoid ingredients like xanthan gum lacks context. Xanthan gum is commonly used in gluten-free baking to improve texture and is generally considered safe. By condemning such ingredients without explanation, the book risks promoting food fear, potentially edging towards orthorexia.
While the straightforward tips are helpful, a first rule advocating balance and self-compassion would have been a welcome addition. Something along the lines of, "Give yourself grace; one Big Mac won't kill you," would emphasize a healthy relationship with food. Yes, I know rule 64 says you can break the rules for special occasions but I don’t think that’s good enough to address the negative effects of creating rules around food.
Some of the rules are presented with an intensity that might be impractical or unnecessarily restrictive. For instance, the admonition to avoid ingredients like xanthan gum lacks context. Xanthan gum is commonly used in gluten-free baking to improve texture and is generally considered safe. By condemning such ingredients without explanation, the book risks promoting food fear, potentially edging towards orthorexia.
While the straightforward tips are helpful, a first rule advocating balance and self-compassion would have been a welcome addition. Something along the lines of, "Give yourself grace; one Big Mac won't kill you," would emphasize a healthy relationship with food. Yes, I know rule 64 says you can break the rules for special occasions but I don’t think that’s good enough to address the negative effects of creating rules around food.
isabellesbooks's review against another edition
informative
fast-paced
5.0
I really enjoyed Food Rules and how it was short, simple, and to the point. A lot of “healthy living” books contain important information and genuine wisdom, but it might be hidden between hundreds of pages of what is suddenly a memoir and lots of philosophical speculation, making you think, “what am I even doing here?!”
Meanwhile, this book is so precise that all advice is listed by number. While some of the “rules” may seem obvious if you’re trying to eat healthy (i.e. rule 36 - don’t eat breakfast cereals that change the color of the milk), they are smart, and I still felt compelled to take notes. Some favorites are:
13. Eat only foods that will eventually rot.
19. If it comes from a plant, eat it; if it was made in a plant, don’t.
24. The Chinese proverb “Eating what stands on one leg [mushrooms and plant foods] is better than eating what stands on two legs [fowl], which is better than eating what stands on four legs [cows, pigs, and other mammals].”
37. “The whiter the bread, the sooner you’ll be dead.”
Meanwhile, this book is so precise that all advice is listed by number. While some of the “rules” may seem obvious if you’re trying to eat healthy (i.e. rule 36 - don’t eat breakfast cereals that change the color of the milk), they are smart, and I still felt compelled to take notes. Some favorites are:
13. Eat only foods that will eventually rot.
19. If it comes from a plant, eat it; if it was made in a plant, don’t.
24. The Chinese proverb “Eating what stands on one leg [mushrooms and plant foods] is better than eating what stands on two legs [fowl], which is better than eating what stands on four legs [cows, pigs, and other mammals].”
37. “The whiter the bread, the sooner you’ll be dead.”
sunscour's review against another edition
5.0
Short and to the point, made me really thing about food in a different light. I especially enjoyed the "Don't get your fuel from the same place your car does" and the "corn refueling stations". Sometimes cooking is a chore and I needed a little motivation to get me back into a better groove.
migueldavid's review against another edition
5.0
the best book I've read about food and cooking. short, simple, to the point. no deep science to slow you down, no fad diets to confuse you. just guidelines coming from millennia of eating.